JMA · ENDURANCE Race1h03

DUNOIS KART

Piste 1200m (1100m) — — 19 drivers

Winner
VOLVO (#17)
Gap P1-P2
13.405
Best lap
1:03.173 — KUBOTA
Teams
19
Duration
1h02
Stops (winner)
3

Endurance Report – Dunois Kart, Lutz-en-Dunois (18 September 2026)

The 62-minute endurance race held on 18 September 2026 at Dunois Kart in Lutz-en-Dunois brought together 19 teams on the 1,100-metre Piste 1200m circuit. At the end of a hard-fought contest, VOLVO (kart #17) took the victory with 51 laps completed, holding off DEUTZ FAHR (kart #1) by 13.405 seconds. KUBOTA (kart #13) completed the podium, a further 28.821 seconds adrift. Every team in the top 14 completed three pit stops, making strategy a decisive factor across the field.

The fastest lap of the race was set by KUBOTA in a time of 1:03.173, the sharpest single lap of the afternoon. Yet, despite this outright pace, KUBOTA had to settle for third place — a gap that the pace analysis helps explain. KUBOTA's median race pace of 1:04.470 ranked 2nd across the field, but an irregular stint structure (ranging from 1:03.859 to 1:07.582 median pace across relays) and a regularity standard deviation of 1.82 seconds ultimately cost the team dearly in the final standings.

The most striking finding from the pace analysis concerns CLAAS (kart #22). Despite finishing 4th — one lap down on the leaders — CLAAS posted the best pure pace of the entire field with a median race time of 1:04.382. However, two stints at around 1:10 median pace (relays 2 and 3), contrasting sharply with their blistering 1:03.864 and 1:03.882 in relays 1 and 4, resulted in a regularity standard deviation of 3.08 seconds — the highest of the analysed runners. This inconsistency across the four stints directly explains the lost lap.

VOLVO's winning performance was built on solid consistency rather than raw speed. Their median race pace of 1:05.053 ranked only 3rd, but a regularity standard deviation of 0.89 seconds tells a different story. Their final relay of 12 laps was their most clinical — median 1:04.843, a standard deviation of just 0.36 seconds, and a stable trend throughout — applied at exactly the right moment in the race. DEUTZ FAHR, the runner-up, was the most consistent team overall (σ = 0.79 s) and held an unwavering pace across all four relays, never deviating more than 0.35 seconds from their median.

Further down the order, JOHN DEERE (kart #14) stands out as the most notable contrast between potential and result. Ranked 7th for pure pace, they finished 15th with only 27 laps — the lowest total among teams in the top 19. Their third relay also recorded the steepest pace degradation of the race, losing 1.75 seconds per lap, before the session was cut short for reasons not captured in the data. NEW HOLLAND (kart #11) shows the opposite picture: a pure pace ranking of 17th yet a final position of 10th, illustrating how consistent pit stop execution can compensate for a lack of outright speed.

At the foot of the order, LIEBHERR (kart #27) was the only team to make four pit stops, completing 46 laps and finishing 5th from last.

Key takeaways for teams: The Dunois Kart endurance on 18 September 2026 confirmed that pace consistency across all relays is worth more than occasional bursts of speed. CLAAS and KUBOTA both had the raw pace to win but were let down by inconsistent stint-to-stint rhythm. VOLVO won by keeping their four relays tight and delivering their best numbers when it mattered most. At this circuit, a standard deviation below 1.0 seconds per lap appears to be the benchmark for a podium finish.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the endurance race at Dunois Kart on 18 September 2026?
VOLVO (kart #17) won the 62-minute endurance race at Dunois Kart in Lutz-en-Dunois on 18 September 2026, completing 51 laps and crossing the line 13.405 seconds ahead of DEUTZ FAHR.
What was the fastest lap of the race at Dunois Kart on 18 September 2026, and which team set it?
The fastest lap of the race was set by KUBOTA (kart #13) in a time of 1:03.173, making it the best single lap recorded during the 18 September 2026 endurance event at Dunois Kart.
How many teams competed in the Dunois Kart endurance on 18 September 2026?
19 teams took the start of the 62-minute endurance race at Dunois Kart, Lutz-en-Dunois, on 18 September 2026.
Which team had the best pure race pace on 18 September 2026 at Dunois Kart?
CLAAS (kart #22) recorded the best median race pace of the field at 1:04.382, yet finished 4th due to highly inconsistent stint times across their four relays during the Dunois Kart endurance on 18 September 2026.
Which team was the most consistent in terms of lap time regularity at Dunois Kart on 18 September 2026?
DEUTZ FAHR (kart #1) was the most consistent team, posting a lap time standard deviation of just 0.79 seconds across the race, contributing to their 2nd-place finish at Dunois Kart on 18 September 2026.
How many pit stops did teams make during the Dunois Kart endurance on 18 September 2026?
The vast majority of teams made 3 pit stops during the 18 September 2026 endurance at Dunois Kart; LIEBHERR (kart #27) was the only team to make 4 pit stops, finishing 19th with 46 laps completed.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
117VOLVO511:04.3911:05.120 +0.4±20.7s#3
R1 14L · 1:05.213 · ±1.1 · 0.16R2 15L · 1:05.030 · ±21.1 · 2.16R3 9L · 1:05.879 · ±28.1 · 6.06R4 13L · 1:04.847 · ±23.9 · 2.94
21DEUTZ FAHR511:04.6291:05.673 +0.9±19.7s#4
R1 12L · 1:05.613 · ±1.0 · 0.11R2 14L · 1:05.519 · ±21.5 · 2.35R3 12L · 1:05.726 · ±23.3 · 3.35R4 13L · 1:05.727 · ±22.4 · 2.87
313KUBOTA511:03.1731:04.862 +0.1±20.9s#21
R1 13L · 1:03.900 · ±1.6 · 0.21R2 11L · 1:07.785 · ±24.6 · 4.39R3 15L · 1:03.953 · ±21.5 · 2.15R4 12L · 1:06.554 · ±25.2 · 3.64
422CLAAS501:03.3231:04.761±21.9s#13
R1 14L · 1:03.864 · ±1.6 · 0.17R2 13L · 1:10.446 · ±22.3 · 2.87R3 7L · 1:09.951 · ±30.7 · 9.44R4 16L · 1:03.971 · ±23.5 · 2.12
52JCB501:05.7841:06.787 +2.0±21.9s#5
R1 12L · 1:06.743 · ±1.7 · 0.34R2 12L · 1:06.885 · ±24.3 · 3.22R3 12L · 1:06.760 · ±27.8 · 3.73R4 14L · 1:06.810 · ±22.6 · 2.52
615CHALLENGER491:05.5341:06.915 +2.2±21.4s#7
R1 12L · 1:07.734 · ±2.3 · 0.34R2 14L · 1:06.294 · ±22.9 · 2.47R3 10L · 1:07.679 · ±26.7 · 5.48R4 13L · 1:06.685 · ±23.8 · 2.91
712FENDT491:04.6231:08.698 +3.9±22.7s#15
R1 13L · 1:05.078 · ±1.1 · 0.18R2 11L · 1:09.767 · ±25.9 · 4.13R3 12L · 1:05.668 · ±27.2 · 3.77R4 13L · 1:09.434 · ±24.3 · 3.17
89LANDINI491:04.7651:08.298 +3.5±23.2s#13
R1 13L · 1:05.126 · ±1.4 · 0.15R2 11L · 1:08.883 · ±29.6 · 4.63R3 13L · 1:06.169 · ±24.4 · 2.90R4 12L · 1:09.325 · ±25.6 · 3.58
94HYUNDAI491:05.7031:08.385 +3.6±24.4s#14
R1 12L · 1:06.531 · ±1.5 · 0.35R2 13L · 1:09.501 · ±23.8 · 2.86R3 11L · 1:06.237 · ±34.4 · 5.48R4 13L · 1:09.045 · ±24.7 · 3.12
1011NEW HOLLAND491:05.3761:08.944 +4.2±21.9s#17
R1 12L · 1:07.149 · ±5.7 · 0.68R2 12L · 1:09.566 · ±25.4 · 3.60R3 12L · 1:06.355 · ±25.3 · 3.38R4 13L · 1:09.602 · ±23.6 · 2.83
116CASE481:06.4941:07.636 +2.9±23.2s#92
R1 14L · 1:07.873 · ±3.5 · 0.44R2 12L · 1:08.462 · ±28.8 · 4.66R3 9L · 1:06.769 · ±28.2 · 6.01R4 13L · 1:07.560 · ±24.3 · 3.02
1220MASSEY FERGUSSON481:06.4951:08.725 +4.0±22.4s#16
R1 12L · 1:07.707 · ±1.7 · 0.38R2 12L · 1:11.552 · ±25.8 · 3.72R3 12L · 1:07.661 · ±25.7 · 3.66R4 12L · 1:09.040 · ±24.7 · 3.44
1326MCCORMICK481:07.1711:09.627 +4.9±23.2s#20
R1 12L · 1:10.352 · ±1.1 · 0.04R2 13L · 1:09.634 · ±25.2 · 3.02R3 10L · 1:10.449 · ±27.4 · 4.97R4 13L · 1:08.406 · ±26.9 · 3.35
145RENAULT481:06.2241:08.175 +3.4±24.9s#122
R1 18L · 1:09.925 · ±1.9 · 0.08R2 11L · 1:07.211 · ±31.7 · 5.16R3 6L · 1:08.951 · ±36.7 · 14.78R4 13L · 1:07.073 · ±24.8 · 3.10
1514JOHN DEERE271:06.1961:06.912 +2.2±34.2s#69
167CATERPILLAR471:06.1321:07.458 +2.7±34.5s#88
R1 10L · 1:10.070 · ±3.3 · 0.76R2 15L · 1:07.523 · ±51.1 · 5.07R3 9L · 1:07.068 · ±29.4 · 6.38R4 13L · 1:06.467 · ±25.3 · 3.23
1723VALTRA471:05.8311:09.102 +4.3±25.8s#18
R1 11L · 1:12.648 · ±2.9 · 0.56R2 12L · 1:08.249 · ±35.3 · 5.02R3 11L · 1:09.102 · ±27.7 · 4.35R4 13L · 1:08.005 · ±24.4 · 3.08
1818SAME471:06.2261:09.223 +4.5±26.5s#19
R1 15L · 1:10.102 · ±22.2 · 1.45R2 10L · 1:07.971 · ±30.9 · 5.92R3 9L · 1:09.529 · ±28.2 · 5.81R4 13L · 1:06.521 · ±25.7 · 3.34
1927LIEBHERR461:06.0881:08.034 +3.3±31.8s#109
R1 12L · 1:07.817 · ±2.3 · 0.27R2 11L · 1:11.488 · ±27.8 · 4.02R3 12L · 1:06.680 · ±28.2 · 3.98R4 2L · 1:57.963 · ±42.8 · 0.00R5 9L · 1:06.877 · ±47.4 · 10.35
1921JOHN DEERE221:06.4801:08.144 +3.4±29.9s#118
R1 5L · 1:07.379 · ±1.1 · 0.58R2 11L · 1:07.703 · ±30.8 · 4.75R3 6L · 1:12.451 · ±36.6 · 13.01

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 0/3

At 80% distance (~13 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1KUBOTA #13P3 (+2)
2VOLVO #17+10.3sP1 (-1)
3DEUTZ FAHR #1+13.0sP2 (-1)
4FENDT #12+1:24P7 (+3)
5CLAAS #22+2:03P4 (-1)
6JCB #2+2:38P5 (-1)
7LANDINI #9+2:39P8 (+1)
8CHALLENGER #15+2:42P6 (-2)
9HYUNDAI #4+2:45P9
10NEW HOLLAND #11+2:52P10

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • Per-driver analysis
  • Finish projection
  • Pit wall
  • Live strategy and alerts
  • Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1▲217VOLVO1:04.8381:04.391Tour 5151
2▲31DEUTZ FAHR1:05.7791:04.62913.40513.40551
3▼113KUBOTA1:05.8191:03.17328.82115.41651
4▼322CLAAS1:03.8821:03.3231 Tour43.94850
5▲22JCB1:05.7841:05.78445.78345.78350
6▲1315CHALLENGER1:06.7921:05.53451.3035.52049
7▼312FENDT1:08.7461:04.6232 Tours9.82149
89LANDINI1:08.4441:04.7657.3157.31549
9▼34HYUNDAI1:09.4741:05.70345.47838.16349
10▼111NEW HOLLAND1:09.0371:05.37645.9640.48649
11▲56CASE1:07.6581:06.4943 Tours34.84748
12▼220MASSEY FERGUSSON1:08.8231:06.4950.9670.96748
13▲426MCCORMICK1:09.4161:07.17134.23733.27048
14▲15RENAULT1:06.7631:06.22439.1464.90948
1514JOHN DEERE1:06.1961:06.19641.6852.53927
16▼57CATERPILLAR1:06.7531:06.1324 Tours22.95247
17▲123VALTRA1:06.8081:05.8316.9146.91447
18▼518SAME1:06.2261:06.22621.47914.56547
19▼727LIEBHERR1:06.0881:06.0885 Tours58.73546