CSE SAFRAN · Endurance Race⏱ 1h06

DUNOIS KART

Piste 1200m (1100m) — — 16 drivers

Winner
RAIKKONEN (#19)
Gap P1-P2
6.765
Best lap
1:03.764 — PROST
Teams
16
Duration
1h06
Stops (winner)
3

Endurance Report – Dunois Kart, Lutz-en-Dunois (11 September 2026)

The 66-minute endurance race at Dunois Kart in Lutz-en-Dunois brought together 16 teams on the 1,200-metre circuit (measured at 1,100 m) on 11 September 2026. At the chequered flag, RAIKKONEN (kart 19) claimed victory with 51 laps completed, ahead of SAINZ and PROST, who matched the same lap count.

SAINZ (kart 24) crossed the line 6.765 seconds behind the winner, while PROST (kart 5) was a further 3.274 seconds adrift at 10.039 seconds from the lead. ROSBERG (kart 3) and OCON (kart 15) rounded out the top five, separated from PROST by only 0.564 and 2.337 seconds respectively, making for a tightly packed front group. VETTEL (kart 16) completed the lead-lap finishers in sixth place, but was over a minute behind the leaders. All six leading teams made 3 pit stops.

The fastest lap of the race was set by PROST in a time of 1:03.764. Yet the race result tells a more nuanced story once pure pace is weighed against consistency and strategy.

VETTEL posted the best median pace of the entire field (1:04.959, ranked 1st in pure rhythm), but a significantly higher standard deviation of 2.36 seconds — the worst among the front-runners — cost them dearly. Their second and fourth stints were notably slower (median 1:09.210 and 1:08.082 respectively), which explains the gap to the leaders despite their raw speed.

SAINZ delivered the most complete performance among the top finishers: ranked 2nd in pure rhythm (1:05.249) with the best consistency of any podium finisher (σ = 0.93 s). All four of their stints were stable, and their opening relais — the fastest of any top-three team at a median of 1:04.697 — set the tone for the race.

RAIKKONEN, the winner, ranked only 5th in pure rhythm (median 1:05.337), but managed four stable stints with a very controlled consistency (σ = 1.28 s). Their strongest segment came in the final relais (median 1:05.062), suggesting a well-managed effort across the full race distance.

ROSBERG was the most consistent team overall (σ = 0.88 s), with four regular stints and a progressive improvement through the race, finishing 4th. VERSTAPPEN (kart 2) stands out as the sharpest underperformer relative to pace: ranked 3rd in pure rhythm (median 1:05.277) yet classified 11th, having completed only 48 laps across three stints — pointing to a significantly reduced race distance compared to the leaders.

BOURDAY (kart 9, 7th) represents the opposite case: ranked only 13th in pure rhythm (median 1:07.538), they maximised their result to finish 7th with 50 laps — a strong strategic performance relative to their outright pace. FANGIO (kart 10) showed the heaviest pace degradation of the race, losing 0.31 s per lap in their final stint.

Key takeaways for teams: At Dunois Kart, the winning combination on 11 September 2026 was not peak speed but sustained consistency across all stints. VETTEL's example shows that raw pace (best median rhythm) is wasted without stint-to-stint regularity. SAINZ and RAIKKONEN, both highly consistent, finished 1st and 2nd. Managing tyre and physical degradation in the closing stints — as FANGIO's fourth relais illustrates — is equally decisive. Finally, VERSTAPPEN's case is a reminder that lap count ultimately governs final classification: pure pace means little if the total distance falls short.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the endurance race at Dunois Kart on 11 September 2026?
RAIKKONEN (kart 19) won the 66-minute endurance race at Dunois Kart in Lutz-en-Dunois on 11 September 2026, completing 51 laps and finishing 6.765 seconds ahead of SAINZ.
What was the fastest lap of the race at Dunois Kart on 11 September 2026?
The fastest lap was set by PROST (kart 5) in a time of 1:03.764, the absolute best lap time recorded during the race at Dunois Kart on 11 September 2026.
How many teams took part in the Dunois Kart endurance race on 11 September 2026?
16 teams started the 66-minute endurance race at Dunois Kart in Lutz-en-Dunois on 11 September 2026.
Which team had the best pure pace at Dunois Kart on 11 September 2026?
VETTEL (kart 16) posted the best median race pace of 1:04.959, ranking 1st in pure rhythm at the Dunois Kart endurance on 11 September 2026, though they finished only 6th due to significant stint-to-stint pace inconsistency (σ = 2.36 s).
Which team was the most consistent at Dunois Kart on 11 September 2026?
ROSBERG (kart 3) was the most consistent team at Dunois Kart on 11 September 2026, with a lap-time standard deviation of just 0.88 seconds across their four stints, contributing to a 4th-place finish with 51 laps completed.
Which team most outperformed their pace in the Dunois Kart endurance on 11 September 2026?
BOURDAY (kart 9) finished 7th with 50 laps despite ranking only 13th in pure rhythm (median 1:07.538), making them the team that most exceeded their expected result at Dunois Kart on 11 September 2026.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
119RAIKKONEN511:04.4581:05.370 +0.1±21.9s#3
R1 14L · 1:05.510 · ±1.0 · →0.01R2 11L · 1:05.497 · ±27.0 · ↘4.22R3 13L · 1:05.370 · ±25.0 · ↘3.07R4 13L · 1:05.076 · ±24.4 · ↘3.04
224SAINZ511:04.0781:05.298±23.5s#1 ▲1
R1 13L · 1:04.697 · ±1.1 · →0.10R2 12L · 1:05.868 · ±27.6 · ↘3.85R3 12L · 1:05.032 · ±27.8 · ↘3.91R4 14L · 1:05.297 · ±25.4 · ↘2.82
35PROST511:03.7641:05.496 +0.2±23.5s#4
R1 13L · 1:04.228 · ±1.2 · ↘0.17R2 12L · 1:07.046 · ±29.2 · ↘4.15R3 13L · 1:04.261 · ±25.5 · ↘3.19R4 13L · 1:06.361 · ±25.5 · ↘3.24
43ROSBERG511:04.8311:05.735 +0.4±22.0s#5
R1 12L · 1:05.946 · ±1.2 · ↘0.19R2 13L · 1:05.837 · ±23.7 · ↘2.97R3 12L · 1:05.733 · ±26.4 · ↘3.70R4 14L · 1:05.286 · ±24.6 · ↘2.81
515OCON511:04.8611:05.939 +0.6±21.9s#6
R1 12L · 1:06.308 · ±1.1 · →0.13R2 14L · 1:05.192 · ±24.9 · ↘2.72R3 11L · 1:05.983 · ±24.6 · ↘3.85R4 14L · 1:05.109 · ±25.0 · ↘2.92
616VETTEL511:03.8371:07.454 +2.2±23.7s#12
R1 13L · 1:04.207 · ±1.2 · ↘0.17R2 11L · 1:09.287 · ±32.4 · ↘5.26R3 14L · 1:04.332 · ±24.1 · ↘2.63R4 13L · 1:08.103 · ±23.7 · ↘2.96
79BOURDAY501:06.3311:07.575 +2.3±22.3s#13
R1 13L · 1:07.399 · ±1.5 · ↘0.17R2 12L · 1:08.249 · ±25.9 · ↘3.58R3 11L · 1:07.471 · ±26.8 · ↘4.18R4 14L · 1:07.347 · ±24.6 · ↘2.65
81LECLERC271:05.3221:06.713 +1.4±24.9s#8
R1 13L · 1:05.839 · ±24.5 · ↘2.69R2 14L · 1:07.156 · ±25.2 · ↘2.73
920SCHUMACHER491:05.8901:07.265 +2.0±25.8s#10
R1 13L · 1:08.102 · ±2.0 · ↘0.31R2 14L · 1:06.874 · ±29.2 · ↘3.27R3 10L · 1:07.758 · ±31.9 · ↘5.68R4 12L · 1:06.439 · ±28.5 · ↘3.99
1010FANGIO481:06.0251:07.847 +2.5±27.1s#14
R1 12L · 1:07.230 · ±1.7 · ↘0.21R2 11L · 1:08.834 · ±35.7 · ↘5.62R3 13L · 1:07.421 · ±29.9 · ↘3.85R4 12L · 1:08.781 · ±26.5 · ↘2.75
112VERSTAPPEN481:04.4741:05.351 +0.1±33.4s#2 ▲9
R1 12L · 1:05.186 · ±9.4 · ↘1.28R2 6L · 1:20.521 · ±40.5 · ↘15.18R3 16L · 1:05.141 · ±43.4 · ↘3.96R4 14L · 1:05.494 · ±25.9 · ↘2.82
1117LECLERC241:06.1231:07.373 +2.1±23.5s#11
R1 12L · 1:06.648 · ±1.4 · ↘0.29R2 12L · 1:07.666 · ±32.3 · ↘4.28
1214MANSELL481:05.7351:10.367 +5.1±26.7s#16
R1 12L · 1:06.621 · ±1.4 · ↘0.31R2 11L · 1:13.631 · ±34.6 · ↘5.85R3 12L · 1:06.706 · ±28.1 · ↘3.99R4 13L · 1:11.440 · ±27.3 · ↘3.23
1318ALONSO471:04.7601:06.411 +1.1±37.5s#7 ▲6
R1 12L · 1:05.302 · ±1.6 · ↘0.37R2 12L · 1:07.826 · ±30.2 · ↘4.53R3 12L · 1:05.664 · ±29.4 · ↘4.10R4 3L · 1:08.481 · ±45.5 · ↘48.43R5 8L · 1:05.623 · ±65.0 · ↘16.31
1426SENNA471:06.0521:11.397 +6.1±27.1s#17
R1 12L · 1:07.025 · ±1.5 · ↘0.18R2 11L · 1:12.047 · ±33.1 · ↘5.37R3 12L · 1:06.894 · ±30.1 · ↘4.39R4 12L · 1:12.535 · ±28.4 · ↘3.04
1521HAMILTON471:06.1601:08.144 +2.8±37.9s#15
R1 14L · 1:08.716 · ±1.7 · →0.04R2 12L · 1:07.311 · ±32.7 · ↘4.64R3 4L · 1:13.689 · ±50.9 · ↘34.52R4 17L · 1:07.260 · ±48.9 · ↘3.97
1613GASLY411:05.4651:06.850 +1.6±39.2s#9 ▲7
R1 12L · 1:05.941 · ±1.5 · ↘0.31R2 7L · 1:47.503 · ±34.6 · ↘10.58R3 13L · 1:05.902 · ±43.3 · ↘5.36R4 9L · 1:43.434 · ±32.9 · ↘7.53

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 1/3

At 80% distance (~13 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1PROST #5—P3 (+2)
2SAINZ #24+6.9sP2 ✓
3RAIKKONEN #19+8.7sP1 (-2)
4ROSBERG #3+12.6sP4 ✓
5OCON #15+13.7sP5 ✓
6VETTEL #16+1:02P6 ✓
7ALONSO #18+1:28P13 (+6)
8BOURDAY #9+1:37P7 (-1)
9FANGIO #10+2:45P10 (+1)
10SCHUMACHER #20+2:46P9 (-1)

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • ✓ Per-driver analysis
  • ✓ Finish projection
  • ✓ Pit wall
  • ✓ Live strategy and alerts
  • ✓ Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro →

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1▲419RAIKKONEN1:05.0771:04.458Tour 5151
2▲124SAINZ1:05.0311:04.0786.7656.76551
3▼15PROST1:05.4961:03.76410.0393.27451
4▲23ROSBERG1:04.9091:04.83110.6030.56451
5▼115OCON1:05.0511:04.86112.3761.77351
6▼516VETTEL1:08.8121:03.8371:03.88451.50851
7▲19BOURDAY1:07.7761:06.3311 Tour52.67950
81LECLERC1:09.4851:05.3224.1244.12427
9▲420SCHUMACHER1:06.1091:05.8902 Tours26.07949
10▲510FANGIO1:28.0691:06.0253 Tours58.34948
11▼42VERSTAPPEN1:05.5931:04.4748.2498.24948
12▲214MANSELL1:11.2731:05.73555.64247.39348
13▲318ALONSO1:06.0971:04.7604 Tours33.98647
14▼426SENNA1:12.3481:06.05211.10211.10247
15▼421HAMILTON1:12.9811:06.16035.63824.53647
16▼713GASLY1:41.0001:05.46510 Tours6 Tours41