Bedrijven Cup - Try-Out 1 · Finale Race1h06

Worldkarts Kortrijk

Worldkarts Kortrijk (850m) — — 15 drivers

Winner
1 VAMO RACING YT (#19)
Gap P1-P2
10.597
Best lap
1:18.074 — FRUITMAND
Teams
15
Duration
1h05
Stops (winner)
4

65-Minute Endurance Final at Worldkarts Kortrijk – Race Report

The 65-minute endurance final at Worldkarts Kortrijk (Kortrijk, 850 m circuit) took place on 22 September 2026, bringing together 15 teams on one of Belgium's most competitive indoor karting tracks. The race delivered a compelling display of pace, consistency and pit-stop strategy across the entire field.

1 VAMO RACING YT (kart #19) took the victory, completing 29 laps — a figure that reflects their pit-stop strategy rather than a slower overall pace. With the best median pace of the race at 1:19.020 and the tightest consistency of the entire field (standard deviation of just 0.48 s), they were the dominant force throughout. Their three stints were all marked as stable, with lap times holding firm from start to finish. Four pit stops did not compromise their result: they crossed the line 10.597 seconds ahead of their sister team.

2 VAMO RACING YT (kart #5) claimed second place with 39 laps and a best lap of 1:18.597. Their race featured a strong recovery arc across their three stints, progressively improving to a median of 1:18.983 in the final stint. However, their overall race pace ranked only 8th on pure speed, meaning the result was built partly on track time management.

FRUITMAND (kart #24) completed the podium in third, 18.246 seconds off the lead, and posted the fastest lap of the entire race: 1:18.074 — the only sub-1:18.1 time of the day. Their 3rd-place pace ranking confirms genuine speed, though a difficult opening phase with early stints around the 1:24 mark prevented a stronger result. Their final 20-lap stint, run at a median of 1:18.552, was the most impressive sequence of the race.

DELAFONTAINE RT (kart #7) stands out as the strategic result of the race. With a pace ranking of only 12th (median 1:21.126), they converted just 2 pit stops into a 4th-place finish with 40 laps — a textbook example of how minimising time loss in the pits can offset a pace deficit in endurance racing.

GARAGE VANTIEGHEM (kart #13) and NMOM-VEKST-RIPL (kart #2) rounded out the top six, separated by just 1.613 seconds at the flag, each completing 40 and 41 laps respectively. CPC (kart #30) finished 7th despite holding the 4th-best pure pace in the field — their opening stint produced a remarkable 1:18.524 median — but irregularities in their second stint (median 1:20.846) cost them positions.

SKYLUX 1 (kart #11) is the most striking case of an underperforming result relative to raw speed: ranked 6th on pure pace but classified only 11th. A catastrophic second stint — slowing by 0.85 s/lap to a median of 1:25.592 — proved decisive and could not be fully recovered in the third stint despite a return to 1:19.572.

Key takeaways for teams: At Worldkarts Kortrijk, pure pace alone does not win endurance races. 1 VAMO RACING YT combined the best rhythm (1:19.020) with the best consistency (±0.48 s) for a dominant victory. DELAFONTAINE RT demonstrated that aggressive pit-stop reduction can yield four positions over faster rivals. Conversely, a single degraded stint — as illustrated by SKYLUX 1 — can erase an otherwise competitive pace advantage. Reliability across all stints, not just peak speed, is the defining factor on this 850-metre circuit.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the 65-minute endurance final at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 22 September 2026?
1 VAMO RACING YT (kart #19) won the endurance final at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 22 September 2026, finishing 10.597 seconds ahead of their sister team 2 VAMO RACING YT.
What was the fastest lap of the race and which team set it?
The fastest lap of the Worldkarts Kortrijk endurance final on 22 September 2026 was 1:18.074, set by FRUITMAND (kart #24).
How many teams competed in the Worldkarts Kortrijk endurance final on 22 September 2026?
15 teams took the start of the 65-minute endurance final at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 22 September 2026.
Which team showed the best pure pace and consistency at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 22 September 2026?
1 VAMO RACING YT posted both the best median race pace (1:19.020) and the best consistency (standard deviation of 0.48 s), making them the most complete team of the day at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 22 September 2026.
Which team gained the most positions through pit-stop strategy at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 22 September 2026?
DELAFONTAINE RT finished 4th despite ranking only 12th on pure pace, using just 2 pit stops to maximise track time and gain positions over faster rivals at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 22 September 2026.
Why did SKYLUX 1 finish 11th despite having the 6th-best pace at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 22 September 2026?
SKYLUX 1's second stint deteriorated by 0.85 s/lap to a median of 1:25.592, which erased their pace advantage and dropped them to 11th place in the Worldkarts Kortrijk endurance final on 22 September 2026.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
1191 VAMO RACING YT291:18.3401:19.020±0.5s#1
R1 10L · 1:18.828 · ±0.6 · 0.08R2 13L · 1:19.064 · ±0.4 · 0.04R3 6L · 1:19.169 · ±0.3 · 0.09
2152 VAMO RACING YT271:18.5971:19.053±3.3s#2
R1 18L · 1:19.076 · ±4.0 · 0.27R2 4L · 1:19.040 · ±0.5 · 0.38R3 5L · 1:18.741 · ±0.6 · 0.31
252 VAMO RACING YT391:18.5971:19.954 +0.9±2.5s#8
R1 11L · 1:22.078 · ±3.6 · 0.49R2 14L · 1:19.963 · ±0.9 · 0.15R3 14L · 1:18.983 · ±0.4 · 0.03
324FRUITMAND371:18.0741:19.378 +0.4±3.7s#3
R1 6L · 1:25.005 · ±2.7 · 0.97R2 2L · 1:26.601 · ±0.5 · 0.00R3 9L · 1:24.380 · ±1.7 · 0.26R4 20L · 1:18.552 · ±0.4 · 0.02
47DELAFONTAINE RT401:19.3681:21.163 +2.1±2.1s#12
R1 12L · 1:21.484 · ±3.1 · 0.51R2 11L · 1:21.660 · ±1.0 · 0.11R3 17L · 1:19.931 · ±0.5 · 0.03
513GARAGE VANTIEGHEM401:18.9511:19.611 +0.6±2.0s#5
R1 13L · 1:19.228 · ±3.4 · 0.50R2 7L · 1:19.401 · ±0.4 · 0.15R3 4L · 1:20.575 · ±0.5 · 0.41R4 16L · 1:19.895 · ±0.7 · 0.08
62NMOM-VEKST-RIPL411:18.7841:19.739 +0.7±2.4s#7
R1 12L · 1:19.708 · ±4.3 · 0.60R2 9L · 1:19.932 · ±0.6 · 0.21R3 10L · 1:19.606 · ±0.6 · 0.15R4 10L · 1:19.910 · ±0.7 · 0.14
730CPC381:18.3401:19.475 +0.5±3.0s#43
R1 12L · 1:18.526 · ±5.1 · 0.74R2 12L · 1:20.846 · ±0.6 · 0.14R3 14L · 1:19.411 · ±0.4 · 0.04
820CODINC401:19.0861:20.818 +1.8±2.5s#9
R1 10L · 1:21.099 · ±3.6 · 0.53R2 8L · 1:22.057 · ±1.4 · 0.46R3 7L · 1:20.757 · ±1.0 · 0.22R4 15L · 1:19.398 · ±0.5 · 0.07
96SLOW RIDE381:19.0761:22.018 +3.0±2.5s#15
R1 11L · 1:23.809 · ±2.5 · 0.30R2 9L · 1:22.228 · ±1.2 · 0.20R3 18L · 1:19.895 · ±1.0 · 0.18
1014LOEMERTC401:19.1121:20.834 +1.8±2.3s#10
R1 14L · 1:19.693 · ±3.7 · 0.43R2 9L · 1:21.310 · ±0.6 · 0.01R3 10L · 1:21.704 · ±0.7 · 0.11R4 7L · 1:20.318 · ±1.0 · 0.41
1111SKYLUX 1371:19.1081:19.723 +0.7±3.3s#65
R1 14L · 1:19.732 · ±4.0 · 0.46R2 1L · 1:21.624 · ±0.0 · 0.00R3 5L · 1:25.592 · ±2.0 · 0.85R4 17L · 1:19.572 · ±0.6 · 0.05
1222SAVACO PILOTS401:19.2741:21.769 +2.7±2.8s#14
R1 14L · 1:19.805 · ±3.8 · 0.44R2 5L · 1:20.986 · ±0.9 · 0.51R3 12L · 1:22.297 · ±0.7 · 0.07R4 9L · 1:23.707 · ±1.6 · 0.30
1321PITSTOP & PILS391:19.7561:21.453 +2.4±3.3s#13
R1 11L · 1:21.453 · ±3.6 · 0.50R2 12L · 1:20.691 · ±0.8 · 0.02R3 9L · 1:25.465 · ±2.5 · 0.66R4 7L · 1:20.508 · ±0.8 · 0.24
1423DH-BOUW381:19.0801:21.014 +2.0±2.8s#113
R1 11L · 1:19.574 · ±4.3 · 0.72R2 10L · 1:20.349 · ±0.7 · 0.14R3 7L · 1:23.105 · ±1.7 · 0.26R4 10L · 1:21.663 · ±1.4 · 0.29
1510NO PROS, JUST BROS391:19.7181:22.230 +3.2±2.2s#16
R1 11L · 1:21.384 · ±3.3 · 0.50R2 8L · 1:22.412 · ±1.0 · 0.13R3 11L · 1:20.860 · ±1.7 · 0.33R4 9L · 1:22.615 · ±1.4 · 0.30

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 0/3

At 80% distance (~13 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1LOEMERTC #14P10 (+9)
2NMOM-VEKST-RIPL #2+1:01P6 (+4)
3PITSTOP & PILS #21+1:28P13 (+10)
4GARAGE VANTIEGHEM #13+2:19P5 (+1)
5SAVACO PILOTS #22+2:34P12 (+7)
6DELAFONTAINE RT #7+2:45P4 (-2)
72 VAMO RACING YT #5+3:46P2 (-5)
8NO PROS, JUST BROS #10+3:52P15 (+7)
9CODINC #20+3:58P8 (-1)
10DH-BOUW #23+4:59P14 (+4)

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • Per-driver analysis
  • Finish projection
  • Pit wall
  • Live strategy and alerts
  • Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1191 VAMO RACING YT1:19.1421:18.340Ronde 4332
2▲752 VAMO RACING YT1:18.9251:18.59710.59741
3▲1224FRUITMAND1:18.5621:18.07418.24641
4▲97DELAFONTAINE RT17.3701:19.8001:19.36835.46742
5▼213GARAGE VANTIEGHEM24.0241:19.3971:19.18346.24043
6▼12NMOM-VEKST-RIPL22.4711:20.0001:18.78448.62744
7▼630CPC19.3791:19.0471:18.96752.91840
8▲320CODINC17.5591:19.2611:19.08655.93143
9▲56SLOW RIDE18.3761:19.4401:19.0761:09.76042
10▼214LOEMERTC17.78251.5191:20.3181:19.6401 Ronde43
11▼711SKYLUX 121.9211:19.3601:19.32419.34640
12▼522SAVACO PILOTS18.07953.57112.0571:23.7071:20.12257.02143
13▼321PITSTOP & PILS1:20.4611:19.7562 Rondes42
14▼823DH-BOUW18.7861:21.4061:21.04759.24042
15▼310NO PROS, JUST BROS1:21.9391:19.7183 Rondes42