Grand Prix Paulstra · Finale Race⏱ 2h05
SOLOGNE KARTING
Piste Nord (980m) — — 13 drivers
- Winner
ALPINE (#3)- Gap P1-P2
- 10.258
- Best lap
- 45.488 — ALPINE
- Teams
- 13
- Duration
- 2h05
- Stops (winner)
- 7
Endurance Final – Sologne Karting (Salbris, Piste Nord, 11 July 2026)
The 125-minute endurance final at Sologne Karting (Piste Nord, 980 m, Salbris) brought together 13 teams on 11 July 2026 for a demanding race that tested pace, regularity and pit-stop strategy in equal measure.
ALPINE (kart #3) took the chequered flag after 145 laps, claiming victory by 10.258 seconds over RED BULL (kart #12, 145 laps) and 12.590 seconds over LOTUS (kart #9, 145 laps). The top three all completed the same number of laps and each made seven pit stops, making the on-track battle the deciding factor. ALPINE also set the best lap of the race, a 45.488-second effort that stood unchallenged throughout the 125 minutes.
BUGATTI (kart #28) and HONDA (kart #13) completed the top five, both on 144 laps and separated by 6.711 seconds. FERRARI (kart #1), TOYOTA (kart #6) and ASTON MARTIN (kart #14) all finished on 142 laps in sixth, seventh and eighth respectively, with TOYOTA and ASTON MARTIN split by only 0.371 seconds at the flag. PORSCHE (kart #4) and CHEVROLET (kart #16) rounded out the top ten on 139 laps, separated by just 0.296 seconds. CITROËN (kart #8, 138 laps), MERCEDES (kart #2, 135 laps) and AUDI (kart #5, 132 laps, 8 stops) completed the field.
The race analysis reveals a thought-provoking gap between pure pace and final classification. RED BULL (kart #12) posted the best median pace in the field at 46.408 s and also the best consistency figure (standard deviation of 0.55 s), yet had to settle for second place. With only 83 analysed laps out of 145, the team's time on track was not sufficient to convert its speed advantage into victory. LOTUS, second in pure pace (median 46.809 s, 8 stints, 146 laps counted), also finished third, underlining that race distance and strategic execution shaped the final order.
ALPINE, classified fourth in pure pace (median 47.041 s), demonstrated remarkable consistency across eight stints — all rated stable — and managed its 145 laps with seven well-timed pit stops. The winning combination was clearly built on strategic solidity rather than outright speed: no stint went off the rails, and the team rotated through fast and slightly slower stints without surrendering significant time.
The most notable degradation of the race appeared in BUGATTI's (kart #28 / analysis kart #10) sixth stint, where pace dropped by 0.26 seconds per lap — the steepest fade recorded in the data. TOYOTA offered the opposite picture in its third stint, improving by 0.16 s/lap, while RED BULL (kart #12) gained 0.23 s/lap in its opening stint before settling into a consistently rapid rhythm.
CHEVROLET deserves a mention for finishing tenth in the classification despite ranking only 15th in pure pace (median 49.512 s) — the widest positive gap between race result and raw speed in the field, pointing to solid strategic management keeping the team competitive despite its pace deficit.
Key takeaways for teams: At Sologne Karting, pure pace alone does not guarantee victory in a 125-minute endurance race. ALPINE's win shows that stable, consistent stints and well-timed stops outweigh marginal lap-time advantages. RED BULL's median pace was unmatched, but limited on-track coverage undermined an otherwise dominant performance. Managing degradation — particularly in longer stints — and maintaining a steady rhythm across all eight relays proved to be the race-winning formula on the Piste Nord.
Frequently asked questions
- Who won the endurance final at Sologne Karting on 11 July 2026?
- ALPINE (kart #3) won the 125-minute endurance final at Sologne Karting in Salbris on 11 July 2026, completing 145 laps and winning by 10.258 seconds over RED BULL.
- What was the fastest lap of the race at Sologne Karting on 11 July 2026?
- The best lap of the race was set by ALPINE (kart #3) with a time of 45.488 seconds during the 11 July 2026 endurance final on the Piste Nord (980 m) at Sologne Karting.
- How many teams took part in the Sologne Karting endurance final on 11 July 2026?
- 13 teams started the 125-minute endurance final at Sologne Karting (Salbris) on 11 July 2026.
- Which team had the best pure pace at Sologne Karting on 11 July 2026, and why did it not win?
- RED BULL (kart #12) recorded the best median race pace (46.408 s) and the best consistency at the 11 July 2026 Sologne Karting final, but its analysed on-track coverage was lower than ALPINE's, which prevented it from converting its speed advantage into a victory.
- Which team showed the most degradation during the Sologne Karting final on 11 July 2026?
- BUGATTI recorded the steepest pace fade of the race during its sixth stint, losing 0.26 seconds per lap, at the Sologne Karting endurance final on 11 July 2026.
- What made the difference between ALPINE's victory and RED BULL's second place at Sologne Karting on 11 July 2026?
- At Sologne Karting on 11 July 2026, ALPINE's victory came from consistent, stable stints across all eight relays and effective pit-stop management, while RED BULL, though faster in pure pace, had less overall on-track time, which proved decisive over 125 minutes.
Race replay
Loading replay…
Loading chart…
Race analysis
Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show
| Pos | # | Team | Laps | Best | Median pace | Consistency | True pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | ALPINE | 145 | 45.488 | 47.118 +0.7 | ±11.5s | #4 |
R1 17L · 46.329 · ±1.6 · ↘0.15R2 20L · 47.451 · ±12.5 · ↘0.62R3 19L · 46.195 · ±10.0 · ↘0.66R4 17L · 47.821 · ±14.7 · ↘1.02R5 19L · 46.429 · ±11.8 · ↘0.82R6 20L · 48.014 · ±11.0 · ↘0.58R7 20L · 46.526 · ±12.1 · ↘0.80R8 13L · 47.821 · ±13.3 · ↘1.31 | |||||||
| 2 | 12 | RED BULL | 83 | 45.786 | 46.438 | ±14.6s | #1 ▲1 |
R1 8L · 46.912 · ±32.0 · ↘5.93R2 18L · 46.450 · ±11.2 · ↘0.76R3 21L · 46.410 · ±10.0 · ↘0.57R4 19L · 46.328 · ±11.8 · ↘0.79R5 17L · 46.274 · ±10.0 · ↘0.71 | |||||||
| 3 | 9 | LOTUS | 146 | 45.902 | 46.857 +0.4 | ±11.6s | #2 ▲1 |
R1 18L · 46.511 · ±1.1 · →0.07R2 18L · 47.047 · ±12.6 · ↘0.74R3 18L · 46.447 · ±15.8 · ↘1.13R4 18L · 46.938 · ±8.6 · ↘0.53R5 18L · 46.870 · ±12.3 · ↘0.81R6 19L · 47.012 · ±12.0 · ↘0.69R7 17L · 46.527 · ±12.0 · ↘0.94R8 20L · 47.084 · ±11.6 · ↘0.62 | |||||||
| 4 | 10 | BUGATTI | 108 | 45.977 | 47.127 +0.7 | ±11.6s | #5 |
R1 17L · 47.046 · ±1.4 · →0.14R2 18L · 46.947 · ±11.1 · ↘0.84R3 19L · 47.039 · ±10.5 · ↘0.64R4 18L · 46.617 · ±17.6 · ↘1.23R5 18L · 47.436 · ±10.7 · ↘0.74R6 17L · 48.844 · ±11.7 · ↘0.62R7 1L · 51.266 · ±0.0 · →0.00 | |||||||
| 4 | 7 | RED BULL | 63 | 46.215 | 46.918 +0.5 | ±11.8s | #3 ▲1 |
R1 17L · 46.918 · ±1.6 · →0.11R2 20L · 47.192 · ±10.0 · ↘0.54R3 18L · 46.796 · ±11.2 · ↘0.78R4 8L · 46.680 · ±22.8 · ↘4.00 | |||||||
| 4 | 28 | BUGATTI | 37 | 45.977 | 47.562 +1.1 | ±19.4s | #6 |
R1 17L · 47.726 · ±25.7 · ↘1.93R2 20L · 46.755 · ±11.0 · ↘0.70 | |||||||
| 5 | 13 | HONDA | 143 | 45.953 | 47.894 +1.5 | ±11.5s | #9 |
R1 16L · 47.472 · ±1.3 · →0.12R2 18L · 48.546 · ±14.0 · ↘0.87R3 24L · 47.377 · ±9.4 · ↘0.48R4 12L · 48.777 · ±19.2 · ↘2.17R5 21L · 47.066 · ±10.1 · ↘0.57R6 15L · 48.211 · ±12.0 · ↘1.04R7 20L · 47.430 · ±10.7 · ↘0.66R8 17L · 48.614 · ±10.8 · ↘0.77 | |||||||
| 6 | 1 | FERRARI | 142 | 46.543 | 47.865 +1.4 | ±13.7s | #8 |
R1 16L · 47.465 · ±1.8 · →0.08R2 17L · 47.250 · ±23.1 · ↘1.71R3 18L · 47.697 · ±10.8 · ↘0.64R4 19L · 47.024 · ±18.2 · ↘1.14R5 15L · 48.223 · ±11.3 · ↘1.04R6 19L · 48.113 · ±10.4 · ↘0.56R7 17L · 48.383 · ±11.4 · ↘0.84R8 21L · 48.422 · ±11.2 · ↘0.61 | |||||||
| 7 | 6 | TOYOTA | 142 | 45.941 | 47.781 +1.3 | ±14.2s | #7 |
R1 16L · 47.760 · ±1.9 · ↘0.24R2 18L · 49.623 · ±14.0 · ↘1.02R3 16L · 46.805 · ±14.2 · ↘1.27R4 18L · 47.882 · ±23.6 · ↘1.67R5 19L · 46.918 · ±12.5 · ↘0.88R6 17L · 48.101 · ±14.5 · ↘0.97R7 18L · 47.102 · ±11.3 · ↘0.81R8 20L · 47.826 · ±11.7 · ↘0.71 | |||||||
| 8 | 14 | ASTON MARTIN | 143 | 46.820 | 48.239 +1.8 | ±11.5s | #10 |
R1 15L · 48.575 · ±1.8 · ↘0.23R2 21L · 47.187 · ±10.4 · ↘0.60R3 18L · 48.538 · ±15.4 · ↘1.00R4 17L · 47.558 · ±9.6 · ↘0.77R5 17L · 48.989 · ±12.2 · ↘0.86R6 19L · 47.446 · ±11.0 · ↘0.76R7 18L · 48.781 · ±12.0 · ↘0.75R8 18L · 47.408 · ±13.3 · ↘0.99 | |||||||
| 9 | 4 | PORSCHE | 139 | 47.926 | 49.090 +2.7 | ±12.5s | #13 |
R1 16L · 48.779 · ±1.4 · →0.12R2 19L · 49.129 · ±13.5 · ↘0.93R3 19L · 48.718 · ±14.2 · ↘0.98R4 16L · 49.621 · ±17.1 · ↘1.45R5 18L · 49.367 · ±11.2 · ↘0.79R6 18L · 49.312 · ±11.2 · ↘0.83R7 19L · 48.902 · ±11.4 · ↘0.75R8 14L · 49.517 · ±12.9 · ↘1.27 | |||||||
| 10 | 16 | CHEVROLET | 139 | 46.914 | 49.582 +3.1 | ±11.6s | #14 |
R1 15L · 51.222 · ±1.0 · →0.06R2 20L · 48.912 · ±11.5 · ↘0.73R3 17L · 50.399 · ±16.6 · ↘1.17R4 18L · 48.175 · ±11.0 · ↘0.74R5 17L · 50.149 · ±11.9 · ↘0.79R6 19L · 48.613 · ±11.0 · ↘0.82R7 17L · 49.825 · ±11.2 · ↘0.76R8 16L · 48.008 · ±11.3 · ↘0.96 | |||||||
| 11 | 8 | CITROËN | 137 | 47.992 | 49.074 +2.6 | ±14.1s | #12 |
R1 13L · 48.699 · ±1.5 · ↘0.21R2 20L · 50.287 · ±13.2 · ↘0.86R3 23L · 49.043 · ±15.1 · ↘0.79R4 13L · 48.750 · ±22.5 · ↘2.36R5 17L · 48.980 · ±13.9 · ↘1.12R6 18L · 48.881 · ±12.6 · ↘0.87R7 19L · 48.914 · ±13.5 · ↘0.90R8 14L · 49.655 · ±12.4 · ↘1.11 | |||||||
| 12 | 2 | MERCEDES | 134 | 47.391 | 48.680 +2.2 | ±18.2s | #11 ▲1 |
R1 15L · 49.695 · ±3.3 · ↘0.17R2 15L · 49.395 · ±27.1 · ↗1.20R3 16L · 48.643 · ±32.1 · ↘2.43R4 17L · 48.582 · ±16.6 · ↘1.25R5 17L · 48.543 · ±10.5 · ↘0.75R6 18L · 48.433 · ±12.5 · ↘0.86R7 16L · 48.922 · ±15.1 · ↘1.55R8 20L · 48.195 · ±10.6 · ↘0.59 | |||||||
| 13 | 5 | AUDI | 131 | 47.516 | 49.629 +3.2 | ±18.4s | #15 |
R1 14L · 49.543 · ±16.5 · ↘0.75R2 18L · 50.466 · ±10.9 · ↘0.74R3 16L · 50.041 · ±20.8 · ↘1.93R4 18L · 49.859 · ±20.9 · ↘1.36R5 17L · 49.211 · ±18.8 · ↘1.45R6 18L · 48.813 · ±22.5 · ↘2.17R7 15L · 51.016 · ±18.4 · ↘1.65R8 15L · 49.074 · ±14.8 · ↘1.41 | |||||||
True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).
Finish projectionPodium predicted : 0/3
At 80% distance (~25 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:
| Projected | Team | Projected gap | Actual finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LOTUS #9 | — | P3 (+2) |
| 2 | ALPINE #3 | +9.5s | P1 (-1) |
| 3 | RED BULL #12 | +35.6s | P2 (-1) |
| 4 | HONDA #13 | +1:17 | P5 (+1) |
| 5 | BUGATTI #28 | +2:07 | P4 (-1) |
| 6 | FERRARI #1 | +2:50 | P6 ✓ |
| 7 | ASTON MARTIN #14 | +3:09 | P8 (+1) |
| 8 | TOYOTA #6 | +3:40 | P7 (-1) |
| 9 | PORSCHE #4 | +5:12 | P9 ✓ |
| 10 | CITROËN #8 | +5:59 | P11 (+1) |
Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).
Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you
- ✓ Per-driver analysis
- ✓ Finish projection
- ✓ Pit wall
- ✓ Live strategy and alerts
- ✓ Post-race debrief
€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.
Go Pro →Final classification
| Pos. | Δ | Kart | Driver | Nat. | S1 | S2 | S3 | Last lap | Best lap | Gap | Interval | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | 3 | ALPINE | 49.613 | 45.488 | Tour 145 | 145 | |||||
| 2 | 12 | RED BULL | 46.039 | 45.786 | 10.258 | 10.258 | 145 | |||||
| 3 | – | 9 | LOTUS | 47.274 | 45.902 | 12.590 | 2.332 | 145 | ||||
| 4 | 28 | BUGATTI | 47.317 | 45.977 | 1 Tour | 1 Tour | 144 | |||||
| 5 | ▲2 | 13 | HONDA | 49.567 | 45.953 | 6.711 | 6.711 | 144 | ||||
| 6 | ▼1 | 1 | FERRARI | 49.660 | 46.543 | 3 Tours | 2 Tours | 142 | ||||
| 7 | ▲2 | 6 | TOYOTA | 48.086 | 45.941 | 27.965 | 27.965 | 142 | ||||
| 8 | ▼2 | 14 | ASTON MARTIN | 46.965 | 46.820 | 28.336 | 0.371 | 142 | ||||
| 9 | ▼1 | 4 | PORSCHE | 49.227 | 47.926 | 6 Tours | 3 Tours | 139 | ||||
| 10 | – | 16 | CHEVROLET | 47.949 | 46.914 | 0.296 | 0.296 | 139 | ||||
| 11 | ▲1 | 8 | CITROËN | 49.835 | 47.992 | 7 Tours | 1 Tour | 138 | ||||
| 12 | ▼1 | 2 | MERCEDES | 47.949 | 47.391 | 10 Tours | 3 Tours | 135 | ||||
| 13 | – | 5 | AUDI | 49.168 | 47.516 | 13 Tours | 3 Tours | 132 |
🏆 Pro Teams