2 HEURES MK · course Race⏱ 2h05
SARL MK CIRCUIT
Piste karting — — 20 drivers
- Winner
NO LIMIT (#15)- Gap P1-P2
- 4.041
- Best lap
- 1:00.217 — TEKY PERFORMANCE
- Teams
- 20
- Duration
- 2h05
- Stops (winner)
- 5
Endurance Report – MK Circuit Scientrier (2 August 2026)
On 2 August 2026, the SARL MK Circuit in Scientrier hosted a 125-minute endurance race on its karting track, bringing together 20 teams in what proved to be a tightly fought battle across the entire field.
NO LIMIT (kart #15) took the overall victory with 110 laps completed, crossing the line ahead of ASV RACING (#14, 109 laps, +4.041 s) and TEKY PERFORMANCE (#19, 110 laps, +14.689 s). ALNA RACING TEAM (#16) and MARNI TEAM (#20) completed the top five, both on 110 laps and separated by just 0.630 s at the flag. AUTOPILOT (#1) rounded out the top six, also on 110 laps, 34.291 s behind the winner. All six front-runners made 5 pit stops.
The fastest lap of the race was set by TEKY PERFORMANCE with a 1:00.217, edging ASV RACING (1:00.242) and ALNA RACING TEAM (1:00.249). Despite holding the outright fastest lap, TEKY PERFORMANCE had to settle for third place on the road.
From an analytical standpoint, NO LIMIT posted the best pure pace of the field with a median race lap of 1:01.016 (1st in pace ranking), and backed it up with the strongest consistency (standard deviation 0.47 s). Their three stints were all marked as stable, with a very controlled third stint of 57 laps at a median of 1:01.067. The pace-on-track ranking matched the finishing order perfectly for the top four.
ASV RACING was the most consistent team overall (standard deviation 0.46 s across 5 stints), with every single stint rated stable. Their median pace of 1:01.057 placed them 2nd in pure speed, and the result — 2nd place — reflects a thoroughly well-managed race.
The most notable strategic performance came from AMANCY TEAM (#25), who finished 7th despite ranking only 10th in pure pace. Running just 4 pit stops instead of the five used by nearly all their rivals, they converted track time into position. Their final stint of 46 laps at a median of 1:01.208 was their most efficient segment and proved decisive.
On the other end of the spectrum, ITALOTEAM (#22, 8th) and RANJ TEAM 1 (#9) both showed pace worthy of higher finishes — 6th and 7th in pace ranking respectively — but did not convert their speed into positions on the scoreboard. JSL TEAM SWISS (#5) recorded the 11th best pace in the analysis but ended up 13th, having completed only 67 laps, which heavily penalised their final standing.
Key takeaways for teams: At MK Circuit Scientrier, the 2 August 2026 race confirmed that outright lap time alone is not sufficient — NO LIMIT won by combining the best median race pace with the best consistency rating. Pit-stop count can be a meaningful lever, as AMANCY TEAM demonstrated by gaining three positions over their pace ranking with one fewer stop. For teams in the mid-pack, reducing lap-time variance (standard deviation below 0.50 s) appears to be the primary differentiator between P6 and P10.
Frequently asked questions
- Who won the endurance race at MK Circuit Scientrier on 2 August 2026?
- NO LIMIT (kart #15) won the 125-minute endurance race at SARL MK Circuit in Scientrier on 2 August 2026, completing 110 laps and finishing 4.041 seconds ahead of ASV RACING.
- What was the fastest lap of the race and which team set it?
- The fastest lap of the race at MK Circuit Scientrier on 2 August 2026 was set by TEKY PERFORMANCE (kart #19) with a time of 1:00.217.
- How many teams took part in the Scientrier endurance race on 2 August 2026?
- 20 teams competed in the 125-minute endurance race at SARL MK Circuit in Scientrier on 2 August 2026.
- Which team had the best pure race pace at MK Circuit on 2 August 2026?
- NO LIMIT had the best pure race pace, recording a median race lap of 1:01.016 — ranking first in the pace analysis — and also won the race on 2 August 2026.
- Which team gained the most from strategy at the Scientrier endurance race?
- AMANCY TEAM finished 7th on 2 August 2026 at MK Circuit Scientrier despite ranking only 10th in pure pace, gaining three positions by making just 4 pit stops while most rivals made 5.
- Which team was the most consistent at the MK Circuit endurance race on 2 August 2026?
- ASV RACING was the most consistent team at MK Circuit Scientrier on 2 August 2026, with a lap-time standard deviation of just 0.46 seconds across all their stints, finishing 2nd overall.
Race replay
Loading replay…
Loading chart…
Race analysis
Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show
| Pos | # | Team | Laps | Best | Median pace | Consistency | True pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | NO LIMIT | 110 | 1:00.315 | 1:01.016 | ±0.5s | #1 |
R1 23L · 1:00.597 · ±0.7 · →0.03R2 3L · 1:00.901 · ±0.4 · ↘0.45R3 21L · 1:00.870 · ±0.3 · →0.01R4 2L · 1:01.615 · ±0.7 · →0.00R5 4L · 1:01.282 · ±0.5 · ↘0.31R6 57L · 1:01.067 · ±0.3 · →0.00 | |||||||
| 2 | 14 | ASV RACING | 109 | 1:00.242 | 1:01.057 | ±0.5s | #2 |
R1 23L · 1:00.623 · ±0.6 · →0.03R2 2L · 1:01.505 · ±0.5 · →0.00R3 25L · 1:00.933 · ±0.4 · →0.00R4 17L · 1:01.207 · ±0.3 · →0.04R5 20L · 1:01.142 · ±0.3 · →0.00R6 22L · 1:01.163 · ±0.3 · →0.00 | |||||||
| 3 | 19 | TEKY PERFORMANCE | 110 | 1:00.217 | 1:01.059 | ±0.5s | #3 |
R1 24L · 1:00.639 · ±0.6 · →0.02R2 36L · 1:00.871 · ±0.3 · →0.01R3 14L · 1:01.220 · ±0.5 · →0.05R4 5L · 1:01.292 · ±0.8 · ↘0.37R5 14L · 1:01.376 · ±0.4 · →0.03R6 17L · 1:01.297 · ±0.3 · →0.04 | |||||||
| 4 | 16 | ALNA RACING TEAM | 110 | 1:00.249 | 1:01.100 +0.1 | ±0.6s | #4 |
R1 67L · 1:00.922 · ±0.4 · →0.00R2 13L · 1:01.558 · ±0.7 · →0.11R3 5L · 1:01.362 · ±0.7 · ↘0.31R4 2L · 1:02.072 · ±0.7 · →0.00R5 2L · 1:02.374 · ±0.5 · →0.00R6 21L · 1:01.422 · ±0.4 · →0.03 | |||||||
| 5 | 20 | MARNI TEAM | 110 | 1:00.227 | 1:01.253 +0.2 | ±0.6s | #5 |
R1 23L · 1:00.612 · ±0.5 · →0.03R2 3L · 1:01.311 · ±0.4 · ↘0.43R3 15L · 1:00.744 · ±0.4 · →0.04R4 33L · 1:01.398 · ±0.4 · →0.00R5 13L · 1:01.306 · ±0.6 · →0.08R6 23L · 1:01.277 · ±0.5 · →0.00 | |||||||
| 6 | 1 | AUTOPILOT | 110 | 1:00.307 | 1:01.403 +0.4 | ±0.7s | #8 |
R1 20L · 1:00.648 · ±0.6 · →0.04R2 17L · 1:02.164 · ±0.5 · →0.04R3 19L · 1:00.564 · ±0.4 · →0.04R4 17L · 1:01.680 · ±0.3 · →0.00R5 17L · 1:00.747 · ±0.6 · →0.05R6 20L · 1:01.620 · ±0.4 · →0.01 | |||||||
| 7 | 25 | AMANCY TEAM | 111 | 1:00.620 | 1:01.488 +0.5 | ±0.8s | #10 |
R1 16L · 1:00.869 · ±0.8 · →0.07R2 29L · 1:02.054 · ±0.5 · →0.02R3 13L · 1:02.307 · ±0.6 · →0.02R4 7L · 1:02.643 · ±0.8 · ↘0.24R5 46L · 1:01.208 · ±0.3 · →0.01 | |||||||
| 8 | 22 | ITALOTEAM | 110 | 1:00.534 | 1:01.258 +0.2 | ±0.6s | #6 ▲2 |
R1 19L · 1:00.980 · ±0.7 · →0.03R2 10L · 1:01.515 · ±0.7 · →0.15R3 25L · 1:01.181 · ±0.5 · →0.03R4 28L · 1:01.324 · ±0.5 · →0.00R5 4L · 1:02.620 · ±0.9 · ↗0.22R6 24L · 1:01.163 · ±0.4 · →0.01 | |||||||
| 9 | 3 | RANJ TEAM 1 | 110 | 1:00.768 | 1:01.389 +0.4 | ±0.5s | #7 ▲2 |
R1 41L · 1:01.239 · ±0.5 · →0.00R2 2L · 1:02.165 · ±0.7 · →0.00R3 11L · 1:01.120 · ±0.6 · →0.06R4 2L · 1:02.495 · ±0.8 · →0.00R5 1L · 1:02.712 · ±0.0 · →0.00R6 53L · 1:01.524 · ±0.3 · →0.00 | |||||||
| 10 | 28 | GRIMLINS TEAM | 109 | 1:00.685 | 1:01.483 +0.5 | ±0.7s | #9 ▲1 |
R1 29L · 1:01.048 · ±1.0 · →0.05R2 15L · 1:01.537 · ±0.4 · →0.05R3 12L · 1:01.552 · ±0.4 · →0.03R4 15L · 1:01.785 · ±0.6 · →0.07R5 10L · 1:01.904 · ±0.4 · →0.11R6 28L · 1:01.462 · ±0.7 · →0.03 | |||||||
| 11 | 30 | TEAM GROS SAC | 109 | 1:00.685 | 1:01.528 +0.5 | ±0.7s | #12 |
R1 21L · 1:01.118 · ±1.0 · →0.08R2 8L · 1:01.499 · ±0.7 · →0.14R3 10L · 1:01.487 · ±0.7 · →0.07R4 14L · 1:01.639 · ±0.6 · →0.07R5 28L · 1:01.508 · ±0.6 · →0.03R6 28L · 1:01.597 · ±0.3 · →0.02 | |||||||
| 12 | 27 | SWISS RACING | 109 | 1:00.951 | 1:01.726 +0.7 | ±0.5s | #13 |
R1 19L · 1:01.403 · ±0.8 · →0.05R2 14L · 1:01.570 · ±0.4 · →0.03R3 21L · 1:01.639 · ±0.3 · →0.02R4 11L · 1:02.032 · ±0.6 · →0.12R5 24L · 1:01.819 · ±0.4 · →0.00R6 20L · 1:01.858 · ±0.3 · →0.01 | |||||||
| 13 | 5 | JSL TEAM SWISS | 67 | 1:01.010 | 1:02.190 +1.2 | ±1.0s | #15 |
R1 22L · 1:02.666 · ±1.2 · →0.11R2 15L · 1:02.419 · ±0.4 · →0.01R3 30L · 1:01.654 · ±0.7 · →0.02 | |||||||
| 14 | 23 | SIMCA | 107 | 1:00.969 | 1:01.838 +0.8 | ±1.5s | #14 |
R1 21L · 1:01.236 · ±0.8 · →0.05R2 16L · 1:03.575 · ±0.7 · →0.08R3 21L · 1:01.487 · ±1.0 · →0.05R4 16L · 1:03.658 · ±1.0 · →0.08R5 18L · 1:01.320 · ±0.6 · →0.05R6 15L · 1:03.994 · ±0.7 · →0.11 | |||||||
| 15 | 24 | R-MO | 107 | 1:01.794 | 1:02.617 +1.6 | ±0.7s | #16 |
R1 19L · 1:02.677 · ±1.1 · →0.04R2 18L · 1:02.581 · ±0.4 · →0.03R3 17L · 1:02.628 · ±0.6 · →0.05R4 19L · 1:02.507 · ±0.5 · →0.01R5 18L · 1:02.742 · ±0.5 · →0.02R6 16L · 1:02.442 · ±0.5 · →0.09 | |||||||
| 16 | 26 | 2 T'ANTION | 107 | 1:01.963 | 1:02.932 +1.9 | ±1.2s | #17 |
R1 18L · 1:02.503 · ±0.8 · →0.05R2 19L · 1:03.281 · ±1.0 · →0.07R3 21L · 1:02.682 · ±0.6 · →0.01R4 28L · 1:03.203 · ±1.1 · →0.04R5 5L · 1:02.854 · ±3.2 · ↗1.13R6 16L · 1:02.953 · ±0.5 · →0.07 | |||||||
| 17 | 18 | JSL TEAM SWISS | 42 | 1:01.010 | 1:01.511 +0.5 | ±0.8s | #11 ▲6 |
R1 26L · 1:01.326 · ±0.5 · →0.01R2 13L · 1:01.773 · ±0.7 · →0.12R3 3L · 1:03.428 · ±0.7 · ↗0.25 | |||||||
| 17 | 8 | BLANDIN ET BRUNETTE | 105 | 1:02.403 | 1:03.438 +2.4 | ±1.3s | #19 |
R1 18L · 1:02.799 · ±0.7 · →0.05R2 18L · 1:03.881 · ±0.9 · →0.03R3 17L · 1:02.897 · ±0.8 · →0.05R4 17L · 1:03.736 · ±1.8 · →0.02R5 16L · 1:02.939 · ±0.6 · →0.01R6 19L · 1:03.897 · ±1.6 · →0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 29 | CUPROUTEAM | 107 | 1:02.274 | 1:03.122 +2.1 | ±1.8s | #18 |
R1 18L · 1:02.728 · ±0.9 · →0.09R2 18L · 1:03.726 · ±2.7 · →0.01R3 18L · 1:03.117 · ±0.7 · →0.00R4 16L · 1:03.251 · ±1.0 · →0.12R5 19L · 1:03.156 · ±2.8 · →0.15R6 18L · 1:02.877 · ±1.0 · →0.08 | |||||||
| 19 | 17 | SW CORSA | 104 | 1:02.292 | 1:04.385 +3.4 | ±1.4s | #21 |
R1 17L · 1:03.061 · ±1.3 · →0.15R2 17L · 1:05.307 · ±1.0 · →0.15R3 16L · 1:04.492 · ±1.5 · ↘0.18R4 18L · 1:03.281 · ±0.9 · →0.07R5 17L · 1:05.102 · ±1.0 · →0.05R6 19L · 1:04.144 · ±1.1 · →0.14 | |||||||
| 20 | 21 | IFLE | 104 | 1:01.909 | 1:04.276 +3.3 | ±1.6s | #20 |
R1 18L · 1:02.523 · ±1.9 · ↘0.16R2 17L · 1:05.048 · ±1.2 · →0.07R3 18L · 1:02.692 · ±0.8 · →0.01R4 17L · 1:05.355 · ±0.8 · →0.00R5 17L · 1:03.082 · ±1.0 · →0.06R6 17L · 1:05.113 · ±0.6 · →0.01 | |||||||
True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).
Finish projectionPodium predicted : 0/3
At 80% distance (~24 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:
| Projected | Team | Projected gap | Actual finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AUTOPILOT #1 | — | P6 (+5) |
| 2 | TEKY PERFORMANCE #19 | +2.0s | P3 (+1) |
| 3 | ALNA RACING TEAM #16 | +3.8s | P4 (+1) |
| 4 | NO LIMIT #15 | +55.2s | P1 (-3) |
| 5 | ASV RACING #14 | +57.4s | P2 (-3) |
| 6 | MARNI TEAM #20 | +1:02 | P5 (-1) |
| 7 | SWISS RACING #27 | +1:20 | P12 (+5) |
| 8 | AMANCY TEAM #25 | +1:23 | P7 (-1) |
| 9 | ITALOTEAM #22 | +2:05 | P8 (-1) |
| 10 | RANJ TEAM 1 #3 | +2:06 | P9 (-1) |
Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).
Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you
- ✓ Per-driver analysis
- ✓ Finish projection
- ✓ Pit wall
- ✓ Live strategy and alerts
- ✓ Post-race debrief
€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.
Go Pro →Final classification
| Pos. | Δ | Kart | Driver | Nat. | S1 | S2 | S3 | Last lap | Best lap | Gap | Interval | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲5 | 15 | NO LIMIT | 1:01.196 | 1:00.315 | Tour 115 | 115 | |||||
| 2 | ▲2 | 14 | ASV RACING | 1:01.305 | 1:00.242 | 4.041 | 4.041 | 114 | ||||
| 3 | ▼1 | 19 | TEKY PERFORMANCE | 1:01.268 | 1:00.217 | 14.689 | 10.648 | 115 | ||||
| 4 | ▲1 | 16 | ALNA RACING TEAM | 1:02.027 | 1:00.249 | 23.309 | 8.620 | 115 | ||||
| 5 | ▼2 | 20 | MARNI TEAM | 1:02.812 | 1:00.227 | 23.939 | 0.630 | 115 | ||||
| 6 | ▼5 | 1 | AUTOPILOT | 1:01.933 | 1:00.307 | 34.291 | 10.352 | 115 | ||||
| 7 | – | 25 | AMANCY TEAM | 1:01.203 | 1:00.620 | 43.188 | 8.897 | 115 | ||||
| 8 | – | 22 | ITALOTEAM | 1:01.113 | 1:00.534 | 43.461 | 0.273 | 115 | ||||
| 9 | – | 3 | RANJ TEAM 1 | 1:02.444 | 1:00.768 | 53.300 | 9.839 | 115 | ||||
| 10 | – | 28 | GRIMLINS TEAM | 1:01.504 | 1:00.685 | 1 Tour | 1 Tour | 114 | ||||
| 11 | – | 30 | TEAM GROS SAC | 1:01.557 | 1:00.685 | 3.846 | 3.846 | 114 | ||||
| 12 | ▲2 | 27 | SWISS RACING | 1:01.851 | 1:00.951 | 23.404 | 19.558 | 114 | ||||
| 13 | 5 | JSL TEAM SWISS | 1:01.577 | 1:01.010 | 2 Tours | 1 Tour | 69 | |||||
| 14 | ▼1 | 23 | SIMCA | 1:03.464 | 1:00.969 | 3 Tours | 1 Tour | 112 | ||||
| 15 | ▲3 | 24 | R-MO | 1:02.087 | 1:01.794 | 10.195 | 10.195 | 112 | ||||
| 16 | ▼1 | 26 | 2 T'ANTION | 1:02.254 | 1:01.963 | 4 Tours | 1 Tour | 111 | ||||
| 17 | – | 8 | BLANDIN ET BRUNETTE | 1:04.546 | 1:02.403 | 44.308 | 44.308 | 110 | ||||
| 18 | ▲1 | 29 | CUPROUTEAM | 1:02.973 | 1:02.274 | 5 Tours | 1 Tour | 110 | ||||
| 19 | ▲1 | 17 | SW CORSA | 1:03.559 | 1:02.292 | 6 Tours | 1 Tour | 109 | ||||
| 20 | ▼4 | 21 | IFLE | 1:05.880 | 1:01.909 | 30.530 | 30.530 | 109 |
🏆 Pro Teams