ENDURANCE 2H00 · Finale Race⏱ 1h36

RACING KART DU MANS

Piste Compétition (1150m) — — 22 drivers

Winner
BMW (#21)
Gap P1-P2
2.943
Best lap
58.600 — ALFA ROMEO
Teams
22
Duration
1h36
Stops (winner)
5

Endurance Finale – Racing Kart du Mans, 18 October 2026

The Finale of the endurance race at Racing Kart du Mans (Montfort-le-Gesnois), held on 18 October 2026 over 96 minutes on the 1,150-metre Piste Compétition, brought together 22 teams in a tightly contested battle decided by a mix of pace, consistency and pit-stop execution.

BMW (kart #21) took the chequered flag in first position with 86 laps completed, edging out Alfa Romeo (kart #24) by just 2.943 seconds at the end of the 96-minute race. Porsche (kart #6) rounded out the podium, also on 86 laps, 18.342 seconds behind the winner. Every team in the top field completed exactly 5 pit stops during the race. The top four finishers all ended on 86 laps, with Corvette (kart #11) fourth, one lap down.

Yet the timing sheet tells a more nuanced story. In terms of pure pace, it was Corvette that set the best median lap time across the race (59.444 s), making it the fastest team on raw speed — despite finishing fourth. Porsche posted the second-best pace (59.445 s) and Alfa Romeo the third (59.490 s), while BMW's median of 59.541 s ranked only 4th in pure rhythm. BMW's victory was therefore built on overall race management rather than outright speed.

The fastest lap of the race went to Alfa Romeo with a time of 58.600 s. Corvette's best individual lap of 58.742 s was the second-sharpest single-lap effort of the field.

Lotus (kart #14) was the most consistent team of the day, recording the lowest lap-time standard deviation across the race (σ = 0.99 s) while finishing fifth — a strong performance in regularity at a level ranking 5th in pure pace as well.

Ford (kart #7) illustrated the cost of inconsistency: despite a pace ranking of 7th, a turbulent second stint (median 1:03.362, σ = 2.42) and a difficult fifth stint (median 1:02.466, σ = 1.99) dragged the team down to 10th at the finish. Toyota (kart #19) suffered the race's steepest single-stint degradation in its second relay, losing 1.11 s per lap over just 6 laps, which contributed to an 8th-best pace ranking converting into only 12th place on the results sheet.

Corvette stood out for the opposite reason: the best pure rhythm of the race, the highest consistency (σ = 1.02 s, second only to Lotus), and relays that were almost uniformly stable — yet a one-lap deficit to the top three ultimately cost it a podium spot. Its first and fourth stints even showed measurable acceleration within the relay (+0.18 s/tour gained in stint 1), a sign of strong in-stint management.

Alfa Romeo's sixth and final stint was its best of the race (median 59.051 s, σ = 0.53 s), a commanding close that nearly overhauled BMW at the flag. Only a 2.943-second margin separated them after 96 minutes.

Key takeaways for teams: At Racing Kart du Mans, having the fastest raw pace is not sufficient — BMW won with only the 4th-best median rhythm, while Corvette (best rhythm) finished fourth. Managing stint degradation and maintaining consistency across all 5–6 relays proved decisive. Teams such as Ford and Toyota, despite genuine pace, paid dearly for high-variance stints. The tightest closing stint wins races: Alfa Romeo's σ of 0.53 in the final relay was the most clinical finish of the day, falling just short.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the endurance Finale at Racing Kart du Mans on 18 October 2026?
BMW (kart #21) won the Finale at Racing Kart du Mans on 18 October 2026, completing 86 laps and finishing 2.943 seconds ahead of Alfa Romeo after 96 minutes of racing.
What was the fastest lap of the race and which team set it?
The fastest lap of the Finale at Racing Kart du Mans on 18 October 2026 was set by Alfa Romeo (kart #24) with a time of 58.600 seconds.
How many teams took part in the Finale at Racing Kart du Mans on 18 October 2026?
22 teams took part in the Finale at Racing Kart du Mans in Montfort-le-Gesnois on 18 October 2026, racing over 96 minutes on the 1,150-metre Piste Compétition.
Which team had the best pure pace at Racing Kart du Mans on 18 October 2026?
Corvette (kart #11) recorded the best median lap time of the race (59.444 s) at Racing Kart du Mans on 18 October 2026, yet finished fourth due to a one-lap deficit to the top three.
Which team was the most consistent in the Finale at Racing Kart du Mans on 18 October 2026?
Lotus (kart #14) was the most consistent team on 18 October 2026 at Racing Kart du Mans, posting the lowest lap-time standard deviation of the race (σ = 0.99 s) on its way to fifth place.
How many pit stops did each team make in the Racing Kart du Mans Finale on 18 October 2026?
Every team in the field made exactly 5 pit stops during the 96-minute Finale at Racing Kart du Mans on 18 October 2026.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
121BMW8658.93059.559 +0.1±15.5s#4
R1 14L · 59.492 · ±0.9 · →0.14R2 14L · 1:00.081 · ±18.5 · ↘1.64R3 14L · 59.749 · ±17.0 · ↘1.50R4 14L · 59.342 · ±16.7 · ↘1.47R5 14L · 59.496 · ±16.4 · ↘1.40R6 16L · 59.685 · ±15.8 · ↘1.15
224ALFA ROMEO8658.60059.547 +0.1±15.6s#3
R1 14L · 1:00.162 · ±1.0 · →0.14R2 14L · 59.752 · ±16.8 · ↘1.44R3 14L · 59.130 · ±17.6 · ↘1.58R4 14L · 59.992 · ±16.9 · ↘1.40R5 14L · 59.401 · ±17.1 · ↘1.51R6 16L · 59.099 · ±16.5 · ↘1.31
36PORSCHE8658.85259.482±16.2s#1 ▲2
R1 14L · 59.341 · ±1.1 · ↘0.16R2 14L · 1:00.239 · ±18.1 · ↘1.61R3 14L · 59.239 · ±18.8 · ↘1.65R4 14L · 59.797 · ±16.5 · ↘1.47R5 14L · 59.344 · ±18.1 · ↘1.67R6 16L · 59.370 · ±16.6 · ↘1.23
411CORVETTE8558.74259.483±17.7s#2 ▲2
R1 14L · 59.648 · ±2.9 · ↘0.45R2 14L · 59.749 · ±20.7 · ↘1.85R3 13L · 59.269 · ±19.1 · ↘2.10R4 14L · 59.431 · ±20.3 · ↘1.79R5 14L · 59.645 · ±18.7 · ↘1.76R6 16L · 59.488 · ±17.2 · ↘1.26
514LOTUS8558.98859.830 +0.3±18.4s#5
R1 14L · 59.851 · ±0.9 · →0.12R2 14L · 1:00.126 · ±21.9 · ↘2.01R3 13L · 1:00.041 · ±20.7 · ↘2.16R4 14L · 59.473 · ±21.1 · ↘1.91R5 14L · 59.814 · ±17.8 · ↘1.60R6 16L · 59.822 · ±18.5 · ↘1.39
610HONDA8559.3781:00.295 +0.8±17.5s#6
R1 14L · 1:00.633 · ±1.2 · ↘0.17R2 14L · 59.966 · ±19.0 · ↘1.74R3 13L · 1:00.280 · ±19.7 · ↘2.16R4 14L · 59.802 · ±18.9 · ↘1.72R5 14L · 1:00.377 · ±20.7 · ↘1.81R6 16L · 1:00.446 · ±17.0 · ↘1.26
713FIAT8559.7401:00.693 +1.2±16.1s#9
R1 14L · 1:00.887 · ±1.9 · ↘0.27R2 13L · 1:01.077 · ±18.7 · ↘1.80R3 14L · 1:00.270 · ±18.7 · ↘1.68R4 14L · 1:00.846 · ±17.2 · ↘1.52R5 14L · 1:00.809 · ±16.7 · ↘1.48R6 16L · 1:00.663 · ±16.1 · ↘1.18
84CITROËN8558.9971:00.570 +1.1±17.4s#7 ▲1
R1 14L · 1:00.880 · ±1.0 · →0.10R2 13L · 1:00.284 · ±20.8 · ↘2.14R3 14L · 1:01.031 · ±20.9 · ↘1.85R4 14L · 59.775 · ±18.7 · ↘1.73R5 13L · 1:01.177 · ±17.0 · ↘1.58R6 17L · 59.627 · ±17.2 · ↘1.24
916BENTLEY841:00.0341:01.172 +1.7±16.8s#12
R1 14L · 1:01.011 · ±1.2 · ↘0.15R2 13L · 1:01.131 · ±20.1 · ↘1.94R3 14L · 1:01.175 · ±17.6 · ↘1.54R4 14L · 1:00.907 · ±19.1 · ↘1.67R5 13L · 1:01.497 · ±18.1 · ↘1.71R6 16L · 1:01.202 · ±16.7 · ↘1.22
107FORD8458.9941:00.594 +1.1±18.0s#8 ▲2
R1 14L · 59.801 · ±1.4 · ↘0.20R2 13L · 1:03.516 · ±20.4 · ↘1.85R3 14L · 1:00.588 · ±18.2 · ↘1.74R4 14L · 59.419 · ±17.9 · ↘1.68R5 13L · 1:02.682 · ±24.0 · ↘2.26R6 16L · 1:00.480 · ±16.8 · ↘1.29
1123AUDI831:00.7611:01.612 +2.1±15.7s#16
R1 14L · 1:01.640 · ±1.5 · ↘0.22R2 13L · 1:03.146 · ±18.5 · ↘1.64R3 13L · 1:01.855 · ±16.8 · ↘1.70R4 14L · 1:01.298 · ±17.1 · ↘1.51R5 14L · 1:01.596 · ±16.8 · ↘1.42R6 15L · 1:01.348 · ±16.2 · ↘1.32
1219TOYOTA8359.0331:00.905 +1.4±19.0s#11 ▲1
R1 14L · 1:00.349 · ±1.4 · ↘0.23R2 13L · 1:03.826 · ±20.1 · ↘1.90R3 13L · 1:00.305 · ±23.7 · ↘2.42R4 14L · 59.692 · ±21.5 · ↘1.96R5 14L · 1:01.942 · ±19.1 · ↘1.58R6 15L · 1:01.509 · ±18.3 · ↘1.43
1318MASERATI8359.7841:01.480 +2.0±18.3s#14
R1 13L · 1:03.339 · ±2.7 · ↘0.30R2 14L · 1:00.389 · ±20.2 · ↘1.95R3 13L · 1:01.660 · ±22.4 · ↘2.40R4 13L · 1:01.822 · ±19.2 · ↘1.95R5 14L · 1:00.736 · ±18.3 · ↘1.74R6 16L · 1:01.264 · ±19.0 · ↘1.37
1412JAGUAR831:00.0931:01.605 +2.1±18.7s#15
R1 14L · 1:00.808 · ±1.3 · →0.13R2 13L · 1:03.827 · ±20.5 · ↘1.89R3 13L · 1:00.707 · ±22.0 · ↘2.35R4 14L · 1:02.080 · ±20.6 · ↘1.80R5 13L · 1:00.720 · ±18.0 · ↘1.84R6 16L · 1:01.983 · ±20.2 · ↘1.54
152PEUGEOT831:00.3831:02.065 +2.6±17.4s#19
R1 14L · 1:01.505 · ±1.8 · ↘0.28R2 13L · 1:02.324 · ±21.3 · ↘2.11R3 13L · 1:02.724 · ±20.1 · ↘2.18R4 14L · 1:00.848 · ±17.8 · ↘1.60R5 13L · 1:01.676 · ±18.3 · ↘1.82R6 16L · 1:02.216 · ±17.4 · ↘1.31
161FERRARI821:00.4891:01.782 +2.3±17.5s#17
R1 14L · 1:01.764 · ±1.2 · ↘0.17R2 13L · 1:01.341 · ±20.6 · ↘1.97R3 13L · 1:04.704 · ±19.4 · ↘1.72R4 13L · 1:01.136 · ±19.0 · ↘1.95R5 13L · 1:04.101 · ±18.0 · ↘1.67R6 16L · 1:01.272 · ±18.4 · ↘1.36
1720MCLAREN821:00.1061:01.999 +2.5±19.0s#18
R1 14L · 1:01.446 · ±1.8 · ↘0.25R2 13L · 1:02.705 · ±21.6 · ↘2.14R3 12L · 1:02.734 · ±22.6 · ↘2.00R4 14L · 1:00.545 · ±20.6 · ↘1.85R5 13L · 1:01.986 · ±21.5 · ↘2.13R6 16L · 1:01.930 · ±17.2 · ↘1.18
1822ASTON MARTIN821:00.7581:02.307 +2.8±17.7s#20
R1 13L · 1:02.986 · ±1.5 · ↘0.18R2 14L · 1:01.697 · ±19.8 · ↘1.64R3 13L · 1:03.075 · ±20.4 · ↘1.98R4 13L · 1:02.085 · ±18.7 · ↘1.85R5 13L · 1:01.742 · ±18.1 · ↘1.95R6 16L · 1:02.290 · ±18.9 · ↘1.41
198CATERHAM841:00.3011:01.192 +1.7±14.7s#13 ▲6
R1 14L · 1:01.847 · ±1.7 · →0.10R2 13L · 1:01.296 · ±18.1 · ↘1.73R3 13L · 1:02.064 · ±17.2 · ↘1.67R4 14L · 1:00.877 · ±14.6 · ↘1.31R5 14L · 1:01.153 · ±15.2 · ↘1.26R6 16L · 1:00.903 · ±14.9 · ↘1.15
203LAMBORGHINI811:00.5641:02.743 +3.3±18.4s#21
R1 13L · 1:02.148 · ±1.6 · ↘0.25R2 13L · 1:05.419 · ±21.4 · ↘2.21R3 13L · 1:02.987 · ±18.1 · ↘1.89R4 14L · 1:01.363 · ±19.1 · ↘1.72R5 12L · 1:04.723 · ±22.1 · ↘2.22R6 16L · 1:02.688 · ±18.4 · ↘1.41
2117DODGE8259.9621:00.898 +1.4±18.2s#10 ▲11
R1 14L · 1:01.197 · ±2.6 · ↘0.21R2 11L · 1:13.158 · ±25.6 · ↘2.58R3 13L · 1:01.127 · ±18.9 · ↘2.57R4 14L · 1:00.706 · ±18.9 · ↘1.68R5 14L · 1:00.666 · ±14.9 · ↘1.38R6 16L · 1:00.658 · ±16.6 · ↘1.19
2215CHEVROLET721:05.5941:09.407 +9.9±20.3s#22
R1 12L · 1:13.522 · ±3.0 · ↗0.75R2 10L · 1:16.144 · ±24.9 · ↘4.33R3 12L · 1:09.407 · ±22.6 · ↘2.75R4 11L · 1:09.261 · ±21.7 · ↘2.34R5 13L · 1:07.945 · ±20.3 · ↘2.04R6 14L · 1:07.589 · ±19.3 · ↘1.93

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 2/3

At 80% distance (~19 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1BMW #21—P1 ✓
2CORVETTE #11+58.8sP4 (+2)
3PORSCHE #6+1:01P3 ✓
4ALFA ROMEO #24+1:03P2 (-2)
5LOTUS #14+2:05P5 ✓
6HONDA #10+2:12P6 ✓
7FIAT #13+2:21P7 ✓
8CITROËN #4+2:23P8 ✓
9BENTLEY #16+2:29P9 ✓
10FORD #7+3:18P10 ✓

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • ✓ Per-driver analysis
  • ✓ Finish projection
  • ✓ Pit wall
  • ✓ Live strategy and alerts
  • ✓ Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro →

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1▲321BMW59.22458.930Tour 8686
2–24ALFA ROMEO59.03258.6002.9432.94386
3▼26PORSCHE59.32658.85218.34215.39986
4▼111CORVETTE59.51958.7421 Tour1 Tour85
5–14LOTUS59.56658.98814.66214.66285
6▲210HONDA1:00.88559.37840.14325.48185
7▲513FIAT1:00.34859.74047.3087.16585
8▼14CITROËN1:00.03458.99753.8646.55685
9▲516BENTLEY1:01.1921:00.0342 Tours1 Tour84
10–7FORD1:01.37058.99413.56313.56384
11▲723AUDI1:01.2941:00.7613 Tours1 Tour83
12▼619TOYOTA1:01.86359.03314.26714.26783
13▼418MASERATI1:01.73559.78449.37535.10883
14▼312JAGUAR1:01.8511:00.09356.4437.06883
15▲52PEUGEOT1:02.1051:00.38357.3820.93983
16▲11FERRARI1:01.4871:00.4894 Tours1 Tour82
17▼220MCLAREN1:02.4581:00.10619.92319.92382
18▲322ASTON MARTIN1:02.2911:00.75827.2147.29182
19▼38CATERHAM1:01.1171:00.3015 Tours1 Tour84
20▼13LAMBORGHINI1:02.4791:00.56416.36016.36081
21▼817DODGE1:00.86159.96227.27410.91482
22–15CHEVROLET1:08.6081:05.59414 Tours9 Tours72