- Kart-Center
- France
- RACING KART DU MANS
- Results & archive
- ENDURANCE 2H00 rKM · Finale
ENDURANCE 2H00 rKM · Finale Race⏱ 1h40
RACING KART DU MANS
Piste Compétition (1150m) — — 14 drivers
- Winner
TJ7 (#20)- Gap P1-P2
- 16.742
- Best lap
- 57.841 — TEAM ROTAX
- Teams
- 14
- Duration
- 1h40
- Stops (winner)
- 5
Endurance Final – Racing Kart du Mans, Montfort le Gesnois (27 Sep 2026)
The 100-minute endurance final at Racing Kart du Mans (Montfort le Gesnois), held on the 1,150-metre Competition circuit on 27 September 2026, brought together 14 teams for a demanding race decided by pace, consistency and pit-stop strategy. All 14 starters completed the race, and the result proved that raw speed alone does not win endurance events.
TJ7 (kart #20) took the victory with 87 laps completed, crossing the line 16.742 seconds ahead of Team Rotax (kart #7), who also finished on 87 laps. BMW (kart #13) rounded out the podium, also on 87 laps but 50.301 seconds off the lead. Fourth went to Team Messager (86 laps), fifth to We Invest Racing (86 laps, 17.624 s behind fourth). Every classified team made exactly 5 pit stops across the 100 minutes.
The fastest lap of the race was set by Team Rotax with a time of 57.841 s. Indeed, the analysis confirms that Team Rotax posted the best pure pace of the entire field, with a median race rhythm of 58.684 s — nearly two tenths per lap quicker than winners TJ7 (58.851 s, 2nd-best rhythm). Yet it was TJ7 who converted consistency into victory: their standard deviation across all timed laps stood at just 0.82 s, reflecting six remarkably stable stints. Team Rotax, despite their outright speed advantage, showed greater variance (1.04 s) and drifted slightly in stints 2 and 6 — losing around 0.19 s/lap and 0.16 s/lap respectively — which ultimately cost them the win.
Third-placed BMW matched their grid position with their rhythm ranking (3rd, median 59.446 s) and delivered six largely stable stints, confirming a well-executed race. Team Messager (4th, median 59.584 s) and We Invest Racing (5th, median 59.863 s) both ran controlled races, though We Invest Racing dipped over 1:00 per lap in stints 3, 4 and 6.
The standout tactical story belongs to GRIGNON (kart #12), who finished 10th despite holding the 4th-best pure rhythm in the field (median 59.526 s) and posting the most consistent race of anyone — a remarkable standard deviation of just 0.62 s across six stints, each one stable. This gap between pace quality and final position points to time lost elsewhere in the race. At the other end of the spectrum, Techniprofil (7th) maintained a rhythm ranking matching their finishing position (7th, median 59.866 s), with strong regularity in the final two stints (0.32 and 0.99 s) after a difficult fourth stint that degraded at 0.26 s/lap.
Further down the order, Merguez Racing Team (8th) and Ascenity 2 (9th) — both on 85 laps — ran very close together all race long, separated by only 0.452 s at the flag. Les Clampins (11th) and Les Percherons (13th) were the slowest teams on median rhythm, the latter suffering the sharpest pace degradation of any stint recorded in the race data.
Key takeaways for teams: At Racing Kart du Mans, having the fastest kart is not enough — Team Rotax's superior raw pace was neutralised by TJ7's exceptional consistency across all six stints. GRIGNON's case shows that a clean, regular rhythm must be supported by efficient overall execution to translate into results. With all 14 teams stopping exactly five times, pit-stop timing and driver changeover efficiency become decisive margins in a 100-minute race on this circuit.
Frequently asked questions
- Who won the endurance final at Racing Kart du Mans on 27 September 2026?
- TJ7 (kart #20) won the 100-minute endurance final at Racing Kart du Mans on 27 September 2026, completing 87 laps and finishing 16.742 seconds ahead of Team Rotax.
- What was the fastest lap of the race and which team set it?
- The fastest lap of the final at Racing Kart du Mans on 27 September 2026 was set by Team Rotax (kart #7) with a time of 57.841 seconds.
- How many teams competed in the Racing Kart du Mans endurance final on 27 September 2026?
- 14 teams took the start of the 100-minute endurance final on the 1,150-metre Competition circuit at Racing Kart du Mans on 27 September 2026.
- Which team had the best pure race pace at Racing Kart du Mans on 27 September 2026?
- Team Rotax recorded the best pure race pace with a median rhythm of 58.684 s per lap, yet finished second behind TJ7, whose greater consistency across all six stints proved decisive.
- Which team was the most consistent at Racing Kart du Mans on 27 September 2026?
- GRIGNON was the most consistent team on 27 September 2026 at Racing Kart du Mans, posting a lap-time standard deviation of just 0.62 s across six stable stints — the best regularity figure in the field — despite finishing 10th.
- How many pit stops did each team make in the Racing Kart du Mans final on 27 September 2026?
- Every team in the Racing Kart du Mans endurance final on 27 September 2026 made exactly 5 pit stops over the course of the 100-minute race.
Race replay
Loading replay…
Loading chart…
Race analysis
Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show
| Pos | # | Team | Laps | Best | Median pace | Consistency | True pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | TJ7 | 87 | 58.121 | 58.853 +0.1 | ±15.1s | #2 |
R1 14L · 58.531 · ±0.5 · →0.09R2 15L · 59.030 · ±16.2 · ↘1.32R3 14L · 58.513 · ±16.6 · ↘1.46R4 14L · 59.023 · ±16.7 · ↘1.46R5 14L · 58.505 · ±17.1 · ↘1.55R6 16L · 59.260 · ±15.6 · ↘1.19 | |||||||
| 1 | 4 | ASCENITY 1 | 29 | 58.886 | 1:00.246 +1.5 | ±12.7s | #8 |
R1 14L · 59.624 · ±1.2 · ↘0.20R2 14L · 1:00.517 · ±17.7 · ↘1.44R3 1L · 56.539 · ±0.0 · →0.00 | |||||||
| 2 | 7 | TEAM ROTAX | 87 | 57.841 | 58.771 | ±16.1s | #1 ▲1 |
R1 14L · 58.310 · ±2.0 · ↘0.27R2 14L · 59.261 · ±16.9 · ↘1.42R3 15L · 58.223 · ±18.4 · ↘1.55R4 14L · 58.769 · ±16.8 · ↘1.50R5 14L · 58.300 · ±17.4 · ↘1.57R6 16L · 59.095 · ±17.8 · ↘1.26 | |||||||
| 3 | 13 | BMW | 87 | 59.038 | 59.468 +0.7 | ±15.1s | #3 |
R1 14L · 59.512 · ±0.9 · →0.10R2 14L · 59.386 · ±16.7 · ↘1.43R3 15L · 59.467 · ±16.8 · ↘1.34R4 13L · 59.297 · ±17.4 · ↘1.66R5 14L · 59.438 · ±16.5 · ↘1.40R6 17L · 59.678 · ±15.0 · ↘0.99 | |||||||
| 4 | 17 | TEAM MESSAGER | 86 | 59.053 | 59.616 +0.8 | ±15.5s | #5 |
R1 14L · 59.569 · ±1.2 · →0.12R2 14L · 59.644 · ±17.3 · ↘1.52R3 14L · 59.850 · ±16.2 · ↘1.42R4 14L · 59.523 · ±17.6 · ↘1.51R5 14L · 59.564 · ±17.3 · ↘1.51R6 16L · 59.726 · ±16.1 · ↘1.17 | |||||||
| 5 | 3 | WE INVEST RACING | 86 | 58.900 | 59.996 +1.2 | ±15.1s | #7 |
R1 14L · 59.695 · ±1.4 · ↘0.26R2 14L · 59.366 · ±16.1 · ↘1.47R3 14L · 1:00.245 · ±16.5 · ↘1.40R4 14L · 1:00.146 · ±16.7 · ↘1.45R5 14L · 59.425 · ±17.1 · ↘1.56R6 16L · 1:00.704 · ±15.5 · ↘1.10 | |||||||
| 6 | 6 | ASCENITY 1 | 57 | 58.886 | 1:00.381 +1.6 | ±17.6s | #11 |
R1 14L · 1:01.001 · ±18.3 · ↘1.65R2 13L · 59.412 · ±18.3 · ↘1.83R3 14L · 1:00.218 · ±17.2 · ↘1.47R4 16L · 1:00.719 · ±16.5 · ↘1.29 | |||||||
| 7 | 19 | TECHNIPROFIL | 85 | 59.105 | 59.935 +1.2 | ±16.6s | #6 ▲1 |
R1 14L · 59.874 · ±1.5 · ↘0.22R2 14L · 1:00.961 · ±18.0 · ↘1.78R3 14L · 59.590 · ±18.1 · ↘1.66R4 11L · 1:00.653 · ±19.3 · ↘2.02R5 16L · 59.570 · ±18.1 · ↘1.43R6 16L · 59.692 · ±16.9 · ↘1.28 | |||||||
| 8 | 10 | MERGUEZ RACING TEAM | 85 | 59.618 | 1:00.362 +1.6 | ±16.8s | #10 |
R1 14L · 1:00.490 · ±1.4 · ↘0.22R2 14L · 1:00.540 · ±17.9 · ↘1.60R3 14L · 1:00.018 · ±18.8 · ↘1.71R4 13L · 1:00.376 · ±19.7 · ↘1.98R5 14L · 1:00.027 · ±18.7 · ↘1.65R6 16L · 1:00.350 · ±16.2 · ↘1.19 | |||||||
| 9 | 1 | ASCENITY 2 | 85 | 59.340 | 1:00.302 +1.5 | ±16.3s | #9 |
R1 14L · 1:00.291 · ±1.2 · ↘0.18R2 14L · 1:00.023 · ±17.8 · ↘1.67R3 14L · 1:00.760 · ±19.1 · ↘1.68R4 13L · 1:00.434 · ±18.9 · ↘1.90R5 14L · 59.811 · ±17.5 · ↘1.66R6 16L · 1:00.479 · ±15.7 · ↘1.24 | |||||||
| 10 | 12 | GRIGNON | 84 | 58.819 | 59.563 +0.8 | ±22.1s | #4 ▲6 |
R1 14L · 59.742 · ±1.4 · ↘0.20R2 14L · 59.557 · ±18.7 · ↘1.75R3 14L · 59.497 · ±18.0 · ↘1.69R4 14L · 59.617 · ±19.6 · ↘1.79R5 13L · 59.652 · ±31.6 · ↘3.22R6 15L · 59.699 · ±28.9 · ↘2.43 | |||||||
| 11 | 21 | LES CLAMPINS | 83 | 1:00.179 | 1:01.643 +2.9 | ±15.6s | #13 |
R1 14L · 1:01.886 · ±1.3 · ↘0.19R2 13L · 1:01.560 · ±17.2 · ↘1.70R3 14L · 1:02.688 · ±17.5 · ↘1.54R4 13L · 1:01.258 · ±16.7 · ↘1.66R5 14L · 1:02.127 · ±17.1 · ↘1.47R6 15L · 1:00.854 · ±16.6 · ↘1.36 | |||||||
| 12 | 24 | LES POTES | 83 | 58.940 | 1:02.304 +3.5 | ±15.9s | #15 |
R1 14L · 59.736 · ±1.7 · ↘0.23R2 13L · 1:02.339 · ±17.6 · ↘1.80R3 14L · 1:02.739 · ±18.2 · ↘1.67R4 13L · 1:00.112 · ±17.1 · ↘1.84R5 14L · 1:02.491 · ±16.6 · ↘1.31R6 15L · 1:02.989 · ±16.5 · ↘1.40 | |||||||
| 13 | 15 | LES PERCHERONS | 83 | 1:00.407 | 1:01.911 +3.1 | ±15.6s | #14 |
R1 14L · 1:01.025 · ±1.4 · ↘0.19R2 13L · 1:01.727 · ±17.9 · ↘1.73R3 14L · 1:03.745 · ±17.1 · ↘1.45R4 13L · 1:00.773 · ±17.0 · ↘1.76R5 14L · 1:01.552 · ±16.9 · ↘1.48R6 15L · 1:03.416 · ±16.1 · ↘0.96 | |||||||
| 14 | 22 | VIRAGE 2000 | 82 | 59.088 | 1:01.169 +2.4 | ±21.5s | #12 ▲2 |
R1 14L · 59.867 · ±1.2 · ↘0.21R2 13L · 1:01.932 · ±19.4 · ↘1.72R3 14L · 1:00.193 · ±19.0 · ↘1.87R4 14L · 1:01.902 · ±34.3 · ↗1.40R5 11L · 59.662 · ±20.1 · ↘2.55R6 16L · 1:01.928 · ±18.7 · ↘1.36 | |||||||
True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).
Finish projectionPodium predicted : 3/3
At 80% distance (~19 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:
| Projected | Team | Projected gap | Actual finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TJ7 #20 | — | P1 ✓ |
| 2 | TEAM ROTAX #7 | +55.4s | P2 ✓ |
| 3 | BMW #13 | +1:11 | P3 ✓ |
| 4 | TEAM MESSAGER #17 | +2:14 | P4 ✓ |
| 5 | WE INVEST RACING #3 | +2:17 | P5 ✓ |
| 6 | GRIGNON #12 | +3:13 | P10 (+4) |
| 7 | TECHNIPROFIL #19 | +3:23 | P7 ✓ |
| 8 | ASCENITY 2 #1 | +3:28 | P9 (+1) |
| 9 | MERGUEZ RACING TEAM #10 | +3:30 | P8 (-1) |
| 10 | LES PERCHERONS #15 | +4:55 | P13 (+3) |
Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).
Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you
- ✓ Per-driver analysis
- ✓ Finish projection
- ✓ Pit wall
- ✓ Live strategy and alerts
- ✓ Post-race debrief
€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.
Go Pro →Final classification
| Pos. | Δ | Kart | Driver | Nat. | S1 | S2 | S3 | Last lap | Best lap | Gap | Interval | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲1 | 20 | TJ7 | 59.006 | 58.121 | Tour 87 | 87 | |||||
| 2 | ▼1 | 7 | TEAM ROTAX | 59.679 | 57.841 | 16.742 | 16.742 | 87 | ||||
| 3 | ▲2 | 13 | BMW | 1:01.059 | 59.038 | 50.301 | 33.559 | 87 | ||||
| 4 | ▲2 | 17 | TEAM MESSAGER | 1:00.711 | 59.053 | 1 Tour | 1 Tour | 86 | ||||
| 5 | ▲5 | 3 | WE INVEST RACING | 1:01.411 | 58.900 | 17.624 | 17.624 | 86 | ||||
| 6 | 6 | ASCENITY 1 | 59.873 | 58.886 | 2 Tours | 1 Tour | 57 | |||||
| 7 | ▼3 | 19 | TECHNIPROFIL | 59.585 | 59.105 | 1.036 | 1.036 | 85 | ||||
| 8 | ▲4 | 10 | MERGUEZ RACING TEAM | 1:00.575 | 59.618 | 14.338 | 13.302 | 85 | ||||
| 9 | – | 1 | ASCENITY 2 | 1:00.519 | 59.340 | 14.790 | 0.452 | 85 | ||||
| 10 | ▼7 | 12 | GRIGNON | 59.729 | 58.819 | 3 Tours | 1 Tour | 84 | ||||
| 11 | ▲3 | 21 | LES CLAMPINS | 1:01.246 | 1:00.179 | 4 Tours | 1 Tour | 83 | ||||
| 12 | ▼1 | 24 | LES POTES | 1:02.660 | 58.940 | 13.364 | 13.364 | 83 | ||||
| 13 | – | 15 | LES PERCHERONS | 1:05.887 | 1:00.407 | 27.500 | 14.136 | 83 | ||||
| 14 | ▼7 | 22 | VIRAGE 2000 | 1:02.152 | 59.088 | 5 Tours | 1 Tour | 82 |
🏎️ 3D tracks