ENDURANCE 3H00 · Finale Race⏱ 2h35

RACING KART DU MANS

Piste Compétition (1150m) — — 18 drivers

Winner
TEAM ASTON MARTIN (#6)
Gap P1-P2
1 Tour
Best lap
59.069 — TEAM BUGATTI
Teams
18
Duration
2h34
Stops (winner)
8

Endurance Final – Racing Kart du Mans, Montfort-le-Gesnois (154 min)

The Finale endurance race at Racing Kart du Mans (Montfort-le-Gesnois, Piste Compétition – 1,150 m) took place on 24 September 2026 over 154 minutes, with 18 teams on the grid. At the chequered flag, Team Aston Martin (kart #6) claimed victory with 135 laps completed, edging out Team Bugatti (kart #22) by a single lap, while Team Ferrari (kart #15) rounded out the podium with 134 laps, a further 30.698 seconds back.

The fastest lap of the entire race was set by Team Bugatti in a remarkable 59.069 seconds. Team Bugatti also posted the best pure pace across the field, recording a median race rhythm of 1:00.316 — the sharpest of any team. Yet it was Team Aston Martin who converted consistency into the win: with an overall lap-time standard deviation of just 1.17 s, they were the most regular team of the day, never allowing their pace to drift far from their median of 1:00.770 across nine stints. Two of their stints did show a slight degradation (0.19 s/lap in stint 5, 0.23 s/lap in stint 8), but these were quickly corrected and their overall rhythm held firm throughout the 154 minutes.

Team Bugatti, despite owning the best raw pace (rank 1 in pure rhythm), showed greater variability (standard deviation: 1.63 s), with two stints where they slowed progressively — 0.22 s/lap in stint 2 and 0.26 s/lap in stint 8. This inconsistency ultimately cost them the win despite equal lap counts and the same 8 pit stops as the winners.

Team Ferrari in third delivered a solid race, although their pure-pace ranking (5th) matched their finishing position fairly closely. Fourth and fifth went to Team Maserati and Team Cadillac, both completing 132 laps; Maserati ranked only 8th in pure rhythm (median 1:02.118), with three stints showing deterioration including a sharp 0.30 s/lap drop in stint 6. Cadillac (7th in pure pace, median 1:01.951) was more controlled but also lost time progressively in stints 2, 4 and 8.

One of the striking stories of the race was Team BMW (kart #10), who finished 7th despite posting only the 16th-best pure rhythm (median 1:03.219). Their strategic management of 8 pit stops and consistent pace distribution allowed them to outperform several faster rivals on the timing sheet — a notable feat in a 154-minute race. On the opposite end of the spectrum, Team Lotus (kart #24) finished only 15th despite recording the 4th-best pure pace in the field — a significant gap between potential and result.

Team Mercedes (kart #4) deserves mention for posting the 2nd-best median rhythm (1:00.323), yet finishing 10th with 129 laps. Their relay data reveals only 4 stints logged in the analysis, suggesting a race disrupted by irregular stint lengths, which impacted their overall lap count.

Team Alfa Romeo (kart #16) was the only team to make 9 pit stops and completed just 60 laps — far fewer than any other finisher — finishing 12th. Their third stint showed a particularly sharp degradation of 0.42 s/lap, the steepest in the field along with Team Koenigsegg.

Key takeaways for teams: This race confirmed that raw pace alone does not win endurance events. Team Aston Martin's victory was built on consistency above all — the lowest standard deviation in the field — while Team Bugatti's superior speed was undermined by rhythm fluctuations across their stints. Managing degradation within stints and maintaining a stable median lap time over 154 minutes proved more decisive than posting the fastest individual laps.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the endurance final at Racing Kart du Mans on 24 September 2026?
Team Aston Martin (kart #6) won the endurance final at Racing Kart du Mans on 24 September 2026, completing 135 laps over 154 minutes on the 1,150 m Piste Compétition at Montfort-le-Gesnois.
What was the fastest lap of the race at Racing Kart du Mans on 24 September 2026?
The fastest lap of the race was set by Team Bugatti (kart #22) in 59.069 seconds, making it the best individual lap time recorded during this 154-minute endurance final on 24 September 2026.
How many teams competed in the endurance final at Racing Kart du Mans on 24 September 2026?
18 teams took the start of the endurance final at Racing Kart du Mans (Montfort-le-Gesnois) on 24 September 2026.
What made the difference between Team Aston Martin and Team Bugatti at Racing Kart du Mans on 24 September 2026?
Despite Team Bugatti posting the best pure race rhythm and the fastest lap of the race, Team Aston Martin won thanks to superior consistency — the lowest lap-time standard deviation in the field (1.17 s) — which allowed them to maintain a stable pace across all nine stints and match Bugatti's total of 135 laps.
Which team showed the biggest gap between pure pace and final classification on 24 September 2026 at Racing Kart du Mans?
Team Lotus (kart #24) posted the 4th-best pure pace in the field yet finished only 15th, while Team BMW (kart #10) finished 7th despite ranking 16th in pure rhythm — both illustrating how strategy and consistency shaped the final order at Racing Kart du Mans on 24 September 2026.
How many pit stops did the teams make during the Racing Kart du Mans endurance final on 24 September 2026?
Almost all 18 teams made 8 pit stops during the 154-minute endurance final at Racing Kart du Mans on 24 September 2026; Team Alfa Romeo was the sole exception, making 9 stops.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
16TEAM ASTON MARTIN13559.2681:00.817 +0.4±24.5s#2
R1 16L · 1:00.226 · ±1.0 · →0.07R2 15L · 1:01.104 · ±26.2 · ↘2.16R3 16L · 1:00.641 · ±24.0 · ↘1.77R4 14L · 1:00.240 · ±25.2 · ↘2.27R5 14L · 1:01.811 · ±25.0 · ↘2.17R6 15L · 1:01.295 · ±25.2 · ↘2.08R7 14L · 1:00.349 · ±27.5 · ↘2.55R8 15L · 1:01.276 · ±25.8 · ↘2.02R9 16L · 1:00.777 · ±28.6 · ↘2.27
222TEAM BUGATTI13559.0691:00.402±23.6s#1 ▲1
R1 16L · 59.902 · ±1.7 · →0.11R2 15L · 1:02.626 · ±25.7 · ↘1.88R3 15L · 1:00.089 · ±22.6 · ↘2.02R4 15L · 59.819 · ±25.1 · ↘2.14R5 14L · 1:03.079 · ±26.8 · ↘2.48R6 15L · 1:00.255 · ±24.6 · ↘2.09R7 14L · 1:00.095 · ±25.8 · ↘2.30R8 15L · 1:02.891 · ±25.2 · ↘1.98R9 16L · 1:00.353 · ±24.1 · ↘1.93
315TEAM FERRARI13459.9291:01.611 +1.2±24.5s#3
R1 16L · 1:01.582 · ±0.7 · →0.03R2 15L · 1:00.377 · ±25.7 · ↘2.14R3 15L · 1:01.443 · ±24.9 · ↘2.16R4 17L · 1:01.949 · ±26.4 · ↘1.76R5 11L · 1:01.020 · ±28.6 · ↘3.51R6 15L · 1:02.278 · ±25.5 · ↘2.02R7 13L · 1:02.604 · ±27.8 · ↘2.84R8 16L · 1:00.653 · ±25.5 · ↘1.99R9 16L · 1:01.965 · ±24.1 · ↘1.83
419TEAM MASERATI1321:00.2781:02.350 +1.9±23.3s#6
R1 16L · 1:01.063 · ±2.0 · →0.06R2 16L · 1:01.894 · ±24.4 · ↘1.81R3 13L · 1:04.809 · ±26.5 · ↘2.51R4 14L · 1:01.268 · ±24.8 · ↘2.42R5 14L · 1:02.220 · ±24.1 · ↘2.11R6 15L · 1:05.298 · ±23.3 · ↘1.82R7 13L · 1:01.517 · ±26.1 · ↘2.80R8 15L · 1:02.357 · ±23.2 · ↘1.84R9 16L · 1:03.560 · ±24.9 · ↘1.93
521TEAM CADILLAC1321:00.1481:02.157 +1.8±24.3s#4 ▲1
R1 16L · 1:02.047 · ±1.5 · →0.05R2 14L · 1:02.904 · ±26.5 · ↘2.53R3 15L · 1:00.808 · ±25.1 · ↘2.12R4 13L · 1:02.172 · ±30.9 · ↘4.07R5 14L · 1:03.354 · ±25.4 · ↘2.26R6 15L · 1:02.124 · ±22.9 · ↘2.01R7 14L · 1:01.864 · ±26.8 · ↘2.44R8 15L · 1:02.555 · ±24.7 · ↘2.02R9 16L · 1:01.400 · ±23.9 · ↘1.77
612TEAM TOYOTA1311:01.5571:03.070 +2.7±23.4s#9
R1 16L · 1:02.205 · ±1.4 · →0.07R2 14L · 1:02.852 · ±26.6 · ↘2.12R3 15L · 1:03.064 · ±24.9 · ↘2.05R4 14L · 1:02.464 · ±25.1 · ↘2.33R5 13L · 1:03.655 · ±25.5 · ↘2.48R6 15L · 1:03.637 · ±24.1 · ↘1.90R7 13L · 1:02.564 · ±26.4 · ↘2.58R8 15L · 1:03.459 · ±23.5 · ↘1.80R9 16L · 1:04.448 · ±23.3 · ↘1.76
710TEAM BMW1311:00.7251:03.349 +2.9±24.1s#10
R1 16L · 1:02.228 · ±1.9 · →0.11R2 14L · 1:03.225 · ±26.2 · ↘2.28R3 15L · 1:03.832 · ±27.1 · ↘2.24R4 14L · 1:01.555 · ±24.7 · ↘2.32R5 13L · 1:03.637 · ±26.9 · ↘2.52R6 15L · 1:04.352 · ±24.7 · ↘2.00R7 13L · 1:02.024 · ±26.3 · ↘2.76R8 15L · 1:03.626 · ±25.5 · ↘1.92R9 16L · 1:03.798 · ±23.2 · ↘1.77
818TEAM LAMBORGHINI13059.8641:02.293 +1.9±24.1s#5 ▲3
R1 16L · 1:01.388 · ±1.9 · ↘0.15R2 15L · 1:02.141 · ±25.3 · ↘2.08R3 14L · 1:06.936 · ±27.8 · ↘2.36R4 13L · 1:01.150 · ±26.1 · ↘3.08R5 14L · 1:02.312 · ±24.3 · ↘2.35R6 14L · 1:09.032 · ±26.4 · ↘2.02R7 13L · 1:02.492 · ±26.7 · ↘2.79R8 15L · 1:01.766 · ±23.5 · ↘1.87R9 16L · 1:02.248 · ±23.1 · ↘2.04
97TEAM MC LAREN1301:00.3111:03.002 +2.6±24.6s#8 ▲1
R1 15L · 1:05.612 · ±2.3 · →0.09R2 14L · 1:02.373 · ±28.9 · ↘2.81R3 15L · 1:02.572 · ±25.8 · ↘2.26R4 13L · 1:04.922 · ±29.6 · ↘3.02R5 14L · 1:01.740 · ±24.9 · ↘2.48R6 15L · 1:03.049 · ±24.0 · ↘2.21R7 13L · 1:05.234 · ±27.0 · ↘2.57R8 15L · 1:01.229 · ±24.8 · ↘2.12R9 16L · 1:02.105 · ±23.8 · ↘1.82
104TEAM MERCEDES12959.4741:04.688 +4.3±25.0s#16
R1 16L · 59.920 · ±1.2 · →0.09R2 15L · 1:05.209 · ±26.5 · ↘1.99R3 14L · 1:04.517 · ±26.6 · ↘2.57R4 14L · 1:00.328 · ±25.9 · ↘2.55R5 13L · 1:08.419 · ±27.0 · ↘2.66R6 14L · 1:05.365 · ±26.1 · ↘2.24R7 13L · 1:00.317 · ±26.5 · ↘2.80R8 15L · 1:06.580 · ±25.5 · ↘1.99R9 15L · 1:05.182 · ±25.8 · ↘1.49
1120TEAM PORSCHE1281:01.3391:03.624 +3.2±24.5s#12
R1 16L · 1:01.757 · ±1.1 · →0.10R2 14L · 1:03.326 · ±27.9 · ↘2.35R3 14L · 1:07.667 · ±27.9 · ↘2.40R4 14L · 1:02.068 · ±26.2 · ↘2.55R5 13L · 1:03.746 · ±25.6 · ↘2.55R6 14L · 1:09.208 · ±25.4 · ↘1.52R7 13L · 1:02.859 · ±24.8 · ↘2.66R8 14L · 1:05.555 · ±25.8 · ↘1.98R9 16L · 1:03.087 · ±22.8 · ↘1.72
1216TEAM AFLA ROMEO601:00.3581:03.915 +3.5±24.8s#13
R1 2L · 1:23.648 · ±22.1 · →0.00R2 14L · 1:05.587 · ±26.0 · ↘2.20R3 13L · 1:01.043 · ±25.5 · ↘2.59R4 15L · 1:03.424 · ±23.7 · ↘1.66R5 16L · 1:04.362 · ±23.9 · ↘1.96
1313TEAM FORD1271:00.1531:04.287 +3.9±25.6s#14
R1 16L · 1:01.396 · ±1.2 · →0.13R2 14L · 1:04.375 · ±30.0 · ↘1.86R3 14L · 1:05.152 · ±25.0 · ↘2.30R4 14L · 1:01.902 · ±25.7 · ↘2.52R5 13L · 1:04.287 · ±29.5 · ↘3.01R6 13L · 1:10.297 · ±26.2 · ↘2.08R7 14L · 1:01.388 · ±26.3 · ↘2.66R8 14L · 1:03.525 · ±29.1 · ↘2.37R9 15L · 1:08.024 · ±23.8 · ↘1.63
1417TEAM SHELBY1261:00.7431:05.274 +4.9±25.8s#17
R1 16L · 1:01.886 · ±1.5 · →0.13R2 17L · 1:06.243 · ±26.1 · ↘1.63R3 11L · 1:04.991 · ±29.3 · ↘3.64R4 13L · 1:02.397 · ±26.0 · ↘2.77R5 13L · 1:08.023 · ±26.6 · ↘2.63R6 14L · 1:04.882 · ±29.6 · ↘1.65R7 13L · 1:02.013 · ±27.3 · ↘2.83R8 14L · 1:07.165 · ±27.4 · ↘2.29R9 15L · 1:05.556 · ±26.5 · ↘2.35
1511TEAM AFLA ROMEO671:01.1131:04.674 +4.3±22.9s#15
R1 14L · 1:08.376 · ±2.7 · →0.06R2 15L · 1:01.953 · ±23.9 · ↘2.10R3 15L · 1:03.769 · ±24.9 · ↘2.02R4 12L · 1:05.872 · ±26.9 · ↘2.79R5 11L · 1:03.257 · ±26.9 · ↘3.43
1524TEAM LOTUS12659.6571:02.745 +2.3±27.2s#7 ▲8
R1 16L · 1:01.191 · ±1.9 · →0.13R2 13L · 1:12.588 · ±28.3 · ↘2.29R3 14L · 1:01.596 · ±26.9 · ↘2.85R4 14L · 1:00.931 · ±32.4 · ↘3.08R5 13L · 1:11.006 · ±27.1 · ↘2.26R6 14L · 1:03.062 · ±26.8 · ↘2.69R7 12L · 1:00.528 · ±28.1 · ↘3.21R8 14L · 1:08.680 · ±32.0 · ↘4.71R9 16L · 1:02.745 · ±25.3 · ↘1.98
165TEAM LEXUS1241:01.0491:03.611 +3.2±26.7s#11 ▲5
R1 16L · 1:02.239 · ±1.9 · →0.01R2 14L · 1:02.365 · ±26.0 · ↘2.33R3 13L · 1:12.694 · ±27.2 · ↘2.12R4 17L · 1:02.477 · ±27.0 · ↘1.94R5 11L · 1:02.771 · ±31.4 · ↘3.73R6 12L · 1:15.180 · ±27.3 · ↘2.32R7 13L · 1:03.915 · ±28.9 · ↘3.17R8 15L · 1:03.180 · ±26.7 · ↘2.30R9 13L · 1:14.913 · ±29.1 · ↘2.30
171TEAM KOENIGSEGG1221:01.6421:08.553 +8.2±25.0s#19
R1 16L · 1:02.431 · ±1.5 · ↘0.22R2 13L · 1:07.497 · ±26.7 · ↘2.28R3 13L · 1:11.576 · ±27.5 · ↘3.06R4 17L · 1:02.939 · ±21.7 · ↘1.74R5 10L · 1:12.088 · ±24.0 · ↘2.26R6 12L · 1:13.967 · ±30.8 · ↘4.64R7 13L · 1:03.378 · ±23.2 · ↘2.53R8 13L · 1:12.026 · ±28.0 · ↘2.52R9 15L · 1:09.827 · ±24.4 · ↘2.09
182TEAM AUDI1201:00.2861:07.239 +6.8±27.8s#18
R1 13L · 1:07.570 · ±28.1 · ↘0.19R2 14L · 1:09.948 · ±25.8 · ↘1.90R3 12L · 1:05.621 · ±30.9 · ↘3.69R4 13L · 1:08.551 · ±26.6 · ↘2.39R5 13L · 1:07.102 · ±27.2 · ↘2.99R6 13L · 1:08.398 · ±27.8 · ↘2.65R7 12L · 1:08.040 · ±28.2 · ↘3.40R8 15L · 1:02.169 · ±25.0 · ↘2.10R9 15L · 1:06.498 · ±29.3 · ↘1.93

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 3/3

At 80% distance (~31 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1TEAM ASTON MARTIN #6—P1 ✓
2TEAM BUGATTI #22+48.4sP2 ✓
3TEAM FERRARI #15+2:27P3 ✓
4TEAM MASERATI #19+2:44P4 ✓
5TEAM CADILLAC #21+3:46P5 ✓
6TEAM TOYOTA #12+4:07P6 ✓
7TEAM BMW #10+4:15P7 ✓
8TEAM LAMBORGHINI #18+4:54P8 ✓
9TEAM MERCEDES #4+5:51P10 (+1)
10TEAM MC LAREN #7+6:47P9 (-1)

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • ✓ Per-driver analysis
  • ✓ Finish projection
  • ✓ Pit wall
  • ✓ Live strategy and alerts
  • ✓ Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro →

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1▲36TEAM ASTON MARTIN1:00.81759.268Tour 135135
2–22TEAM BUGATTI1:00.88359.0691 Tour1 Tour135
3▲215TEAM FERRARI1:01.52659.92930.69830.698134
4▲319TEAM MASERATI1:04.2631:00.2783 Tours2 Tours132
5▲121TEAM CADILLAC1:02.7861:00.1481.0651.065132
6▲712TEAM TOYOTA1:10.1931:01.5574 Tours1 Tour131
7▲710TEAM BMW1:04.6781:00.72510.25210.252131
8▲218TEAM LAMBORGHINI1:02.91059.8645 Tours1 Tour130
9▼87TEAM MC LAREN1:02.3921:00.31112.87012.870130
10▼74TEAM MERCEDES1:10.63159.4746 Tours1 Tour129
11▲520TEAM PORSCHE1:03.2961:01.3397 Tours1 Tour128
1216TEAM AFLA ROMEO1:03.8641:00.3587.3717.37161
13▼413TEAM FORD1:10.7101:00.1538 Tours1 Tour127
14▼217TEAM SHELBY1:06.7371:00.7439 Tours1 Tour126
15▼424TEAM LOTUS1:03.33359.65720.68920.689126
16▼15TEAM LEXUS1:15.0371:01.04912 Tours3 Tours124
17▲11TEAM KOENIGSEGG1:10.5021:01.64215 Tours3 Tours122
18▼12TEAM AUDI1:24.2821:00.28616 Tours1 Tour120