ZFP POD 30 Race · Race Race1h57

Motokáry Modřice

Motokáry Modřice (450m) — — 11 drivers

Winner
TÝM E (#15)
Gap P1-P2
23.959
Best lap
44.720 — TÝM E
Teams
11
Duration
1h57
Stops (winner)
9

Endurance Race Report – Motokáry Modřice, 27 August 2026

On 27 August 2026, the 450-metre circuit of Motokáry Modřice, in Modřice, hosted a 117-minute endurance race bringing together 11 teams. At the end of a closely fought contest, TÝM E (kart #15) took the overall victory with 125 laps completed, crossing the line 23.959 seconds ahead of TÝM D (kart #3), who matched the same lap count. TÝM F (kart #16) completed the podium, also on 125 laps, a further 17.850 seconds back.

TÝM A (kart #14) finished fourth, one lap down on 124 tours, while TÝM H (kart #4) and TÝM C (kart #1) came home sixth and seventh on 122 and 121 laps respectively. TÝM G (kart #8) shared the same lap count as TÝM C in eighth, separated by 18.163 seconds. TÝM B (kart #13), TÝM K (kart #17) and TÝM I (kart #11) all completed 120 laps, finishing fifth, ninth and tenth. TÝM J (kart #12) rounded out the field in eleventh on 117 laps. Every team made exactly 9 pit stops during the race.

The fastest lap of the entire race was set by TÝM E with a 44.720-second lap, the only team to dip below 45 seconds. This performance is consistent with their dominant pure pace throughout the event.

The analysis reveals that the finishing order closely mirrored the pace hierarchy. TÝM E recorded the best median pace of the field at 47.317 s (1st in pure pace), and their consistency was solid with a standard deviation of 1.67 s. Notably, their final stint was their fastest of the race — a median of 44.989 s — with a positive trend of +0.15 s/lap acceleration over 9 laps, demonstrating excellent management of their kart to the very end.

TÝM D (median 47.449 s, 2nd in pace) and TÝM F (47.469 s, 3rd in pace) were closely matched throughout, separated by just 0.020 s in median pace. TÝM F's overall regularity was slightly lower (σ = 1.81 s vs 1.36 s for TÝM D), with several stints in the 49–50 s range pulling their average up. TÝM A, fourth in both the race and the pace rankings (47.642 s), showed a significant dip in stint 4 (median 51.109 s) but recovered well across the second half.

Two results stand out as notable divergences between pace and final position. TÝM I ranked 6th in pure pace (median 48.115 s) yet finished only 10th: their pace was genuinely competitive, but it did not translate into the lap count needed to challenge the top half. Conversely, TÝM H ranked 9th in pure pace (48.764 s) but finished 6th, suggesting effective execution of their pit stop strategy across 10 stints. TÝM G was the most consistent team in the field, posting the lowest standard deviation at 1.20 s, though their median pace (48.554 s, 8th) placed them mid-pack. TÝM J struggled the most with consistency (σ = 2.03 s, highest in the field) and showed the steepest degradation in stint 1 (+0.29 s/lap), which contributed to their last-place finish on 117 laps.

Key takeaways for teams: At Motokáry Modřice, pure pace proved decisive — the top four in the race matched the top four in the pace rankings. Maintaining a tight standard deviation across all stints (as TÝM G demonstrated) and sustaining pace deep into the final stints (as TÝM E showed with their fastest closing stint) are the margins that separate the podium from the midfield. Teams showing high variability between stints, particularly above 50 s on a 47-second-average track, lose multiple laps over the course of two hours.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the endurance race at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026?
TÝM E (kart #15) won the 117-minute endurance race at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026, completing 125 laps and finishing 23.959 seconds ahead of second-placed TÝM D.
What was the fastest lap of the race and which team set it?
The fastest lap of the race at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026 was a 44.720-second lap, set by TÝM E (kart #15).
How many teams took part in the Motokáry Modřice endurance race on 27 August 2026?
11 teams took part in the endurance race held at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026, over a duration of 117 minutes.
How many pit stops did each team make at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026?
Every team made exactly 9 pit stops during the endurance race at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026.
Which team had the best pace consistency at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026?
TÝM G (kart #8) was the most consistent team at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026, recording the lowest lap time standard deviation of 1.20 seconds across all their stints.
Which team performed above expectations relative to their pure pace at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026?
TÝM H finished 6th despite ranking only 9th in pure pace at Motokáry Modřice on 27 August 2026, making them the team that best outperformed their raw speed ranking through race execution.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
115TÝM E12544.72047.542±4.6s#1
R1 13L · 45.436 · ±2.6 · 0.23R2 10L · 49.868 · ±4.0 · 0.78R3 12L · 47.431 · ±4.3 · 0.68R4 13L · 48.674 · ±3.7 · 0.54R5 14L · 45.919 · ±6.4 · 0.39R6 10L · 49.502 · ±4.1 · 0.80R7 12L · 47.383 · ±4.9 · 0.72R8 14L · 48.222 · ±3.8 · 0.40R9 17L · 45.618 · ±3.7 · 0.35R10 10L · 45.117 · ±4.8 · 0.99
23TÝM D12545.10047.657 +0.1±4.3s#2
R1 10L · 47.700 · ±1.9 · 0.53R2 12L · 48.560 · ±4.3 · 0.53R3 12L · 48.241 · ±4.1 · 0.70R4 13L · 46.980 · ±4.6 · 0.63R5 12L · 49.711 · ±4.3 · 0.80R6 11L · 46.323 · ±4.6 · 0.62R7 13L · 47.667 · ±4.1 · 0.47R8 14L · 46.343 · ±4.7 · 0.53R9 17L · 47.200 · ±3.6 · 0.29R10 11L · 45.910 · ±4.6 · 0.75
316TÝM F12545.23547.744 +0.2±4.4s#3
R1 12L · 45.683 · ±0.3 · 0.05R2 11L · 50.155 · ±3.8 · 0.79R3 12L · 49.773 · ±3.7 · 0.59R4 12L · 46.709 · ±4.4 · 0.58R5 13L · 46.075 · ±4.6 · 0.63R6 10L · 50.431 · ±3.8 · 0.87R7 14L · 46.332 · ±4.6 · 0.61R8 14L · 47.174 · ±4.2 · 0.41R9 14L · 48.665 · ±4.4 · 0.43R10 13L · 46.226 · ±4.5 · 0.67
414TÝM A12445.54547.959 +0.4±5.2s#4
R1 10L · 47.613 · ±0.6 · 0.12R2 12L · 47.535 · ±4.4 · 0.67R3 12L · 48.290 · ±4.1 · 0.61R4 12L · 51.436 · ±3.7 · 0.70R5 15L · 47.025 · ±4.0 · 0.41R6 9L · 46.741 · ±5.1 · 1.29R7 14L · 47.395 · ±5.0 · 0.59R8 14L · 46.865 · ±4.2 · 0.44R9 14L · 50.739 · ±3.0 · 0.24R10 12L · 46.633 · ±10.2 · 0.78
513TÝM B12045.66648.498 +1.0±10.8s#6
R1 10L · 47.285 · ±7.6 · 0.84R2 11L · 47.710 · ±5.3 · 1.05R3 10L · 49.620 · ±32.1 · 3.55R4 14L · 48.443 · ±4.0 · 0.50R5 10L · 52.660 · ±4.1 · 1.03R6 12L · 46.687 · ±1.3 · 0.13R7 13L · 46.612 · ±4.1 · 0.48R8 13L · 49.047 · ±3.8 · 0.61R9 17L · 48.088 · ±3.5 · 0.28R10 10L · 51.315 · ±4.4 · 0.97
64TÝM H12246.65548.818 +1.3±5.4s#9
R1 10L · 48.818 · ±1.9 · 0.02R2 11L · 49.556 · ±3.8 · 0.64R3 12L · 48.579 · ±4.0 · 0.61R4 13L · 47.908 · ±4.9 · 0.67R5 14L · 48.763 · ±3.7 · 0.27R6 9L · 49.323 · ±4.4 · 1.12R7 12L · 50.028 · ±4.3 · 0.58R8 14L · 48.740 · ±3.9 · 0.47R9 17L · 48.056 · ±4.2 · 0.36R10 10L · 48.763 · ±12.2 · 1.38
71TÝM C12145.56148.372 +0.8±6.9s#52
R1 10L · 46.725 · ±12.7 · 1.16R2 10L · 52.440 · ±3.4 · 0.67R3 11L · 48.726 · ±12.7 · 0.25R4 12L · 50.958 · ±4.1 · 0.81R5 15L · 46.198 · ±4.2 · 0.55R6 9L · 50.568 · ±4.1 · 0.89R7 12L · 48.396 · ±5.2 · 0.85R8 14L · 47.971 · ±3.9 · 0.48R9 18L · 46.729 · ±3.7 · 0.28R10 10L · 46.641 · ±4.5 · 0.82
88TÝM G12146.91448.763 +1.2±5.3s#8
R1 10L · 48.786 · ±1.8 · 0.00R2 10L · 50.798 · ±7.9 · 0.66R3 11L · 50.115 · ±8.8 · 0.57R4 13L · 48.871 · ±4.8 · 0.69R5 14L · 48.517 · ±4.2 · 0.57R6 11L · 48.763 · ±4.2 · 0.56R7 11L · 48.403 · ±4.3 · 0.76R8 14L · 48.796 · ±3.9 · 0.52R9 16L · 48.154 · ±3.7 · 0.27R10 11L · 47.934 · ±4.2 · 0.69
917TÝM K12046.48949.158 +1.6±4.6s#10
R1 10L · 48.531 · ±1.5 · 0.05R2 10L · 51.922 · ±3.5 · 0.78R3 12L · 48.395 · ±7.0 · 0.97R4 13L · 50.548 · ±3.5 · 0.58R5 12L · 48.004 · ±5.1 · 0.70R6 12L · 49.511 · ±3.7 · 0.58R7 11L · 48.395 · ±4.2 · 0.80R8 14L · 48.784 · ±4.2 · 0.59R9 16L · 48.441 · ±4.3 · 0.34R10 10L · 48.106 · ±5.1 · 1.16
1011TÝM I12045.55048.677 +1.1±5.5s#73
R1 10L · 48.872 · ±3.3 · 0.33R2 11L · 47.887 · ±6.0 · 1.32R3 11L · 52.696 · ±10.1 · 0.23R4 13L · 48.658 · ±3.7 · 0.50R5 13L · 47.241 · ±4.3 · 0.42R6 9L · 50.362 · ±3.9 · 1.10R7 13L · 48.483 · ±4.0 · 0.42R8 13L · 50.181 · ±4.0 · 0.17R9 16L · 47.840 · ±3.6 · 0.32R10 11L · 46.536 · ±4.4 · 0.80
1112TÝM J11746.70049.850 +2.3±7.6s#11
R1 10L · 48.726 · ±1.4 · 0.29R2 8L · 1:04.745 · ±14.8 · 3.02R3 11L · 53.709 · ±2.9 · 0.67R4 13L · 47.887 · ±4.4 · 0.40R5 15L · 47.223 · ±4.3 · 0.45R6 8L · 51.644 · ±11.5 · 3.23R7 11L · 51.522 · ±4.1 · 0.49R8 14L · 50.855 · ±3.4 · 0.58R9 15L · 47.565 · ±3.8 · 0.41R10 12L · 47.346 · ±4.0 · 0.55

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 0/3

At 80% distance (~23 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1TÝM F #16P3 (+2)
2TÝM A #14+5.3sP4 (+2)
3TÝM E #15+13.4sP1 (-2)
4TÝM D #3+14.3sP2 (-2)
5TÝM H #4+3:06P6 (+1)
6TÝM B #13+3:38P5 (-1)
7TÝM G #8+3:49P8 (+1)
8TÝM C #1+3:52P7 (-1)
9TÝM K #17+4:08P9
10TÝM I #11+4:41P10

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • Per-driver analysis
  • Finish projection
  • Pit wall
  • Live strategy and alerts
  • Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
115TÝM E44.90344.720Kolo 125125
2▲63TÝM D45.70745.10023.95923.959125
316TÝM F47.14745.23541.80917.850125
4▲114TÝM A1:21.71045.5451 Kolo1 Kolo124
5▼113TÝM B50.54445.6663 Kola2 Kola120
6▲14TÝM H1:28.62346.65545.67545.675122
7▼11TÝM C46.26445.5614 Kola1 Kolo121
8▲18TÝM G47.86346.91418.16318.163121
9▲217TÝM K47.09646.4895 Kola1 Kolo120
10▼811TÝM I45.72845.5500.2770.277120
11▼112TÝM J46.78846.7008 Kola3 Kola117