E 45 · Finale Race⏱ 1h11
MKRACING
Piste Karting (815m) — — 15 drivers
- Winner
LOTUS (#9)- Gap P1-P2
- 9.843
- Best lap
- 46.009 — MERCEDES
- Teams
- 15
- Duration
- 1h10
- Stops (winner)
- 6
70-Minute Endurance Final at MKRACING Saint Christophe du Bois – Race Report
The 70-minute endurance final at MKRACING in Saint-Christophe-du-Bois (815 m circuit) took place on 17 July 2026, bringing together 15 teams for a demanding race decided as much by strategy and consistency as by outright pace.
LOTUS (kart #9) claimed victory after 79 laps, finishing one lap ahead of a chasing pack. The win was far from straightforward: LOTUS made 6 pit stops — one more than most of their rivals — yet converted the best pure pace on track into a clear result. Their median lap time of 47.641 s was the fastest of the field, and their overall consistency figure of 1.22 s standard deviation reflected a well-managed race from start to finish. Their fifth stint, 16 laps with a median of 46.858 s and the team's personal best of 46.235 s, was their most aggressive and most efficient of the race, with a standard deviation of just 0.69 s — their tightest stretch of the afternoon.
MERCEDES (kart #6) finished second, 9.843 s behind at the flag after 80 laps. They set the fastest lap of the entire race — 46.009 s — and held the second-best pure pace median (47.870 s). Their second stint, 17 laps at a median of 46.546 s with a tight deviation of 0.58 s, stands as one of the most controlled efforts of the race. With only 5 pit stops, their time-in-pit balance worked in their favour over 80 tours, yet it was not enough to close down LOTUS.
CITROËN (kart #16) completed the podium, also on 80 laps, 34.036 s off the lead. Despite holding only the 4th-best pure rhythm (47.912 s median), consistent management across six stints allowed them to beat faster rivals on the road. Their 3rd and 5th stints — both with a median under 47.2 s — were key to holding their position.
TOYOTA (4th) and AUDI (5th) both completed 79 laps. Notably, AUDI's median pace of 48.533 s placed them only 11th in pure rhythm, yet their race management delivered a 5th-place finish — the clearest example of strategic overperformance on the day.
BMW (kart #12, 7th) deserves a special mention: with a median of 47.900 s (3rd-best rhythm) and the most consistent race of the field (standard deviation of just 0.85 s across all laps), they had the tools to challenge the podium. However, a degradation of 0.20 s/lap in their final stint cost them positions in the closing stages, and their 78 laps left them behind teams with a better stop-and-pace balance.
At the opposite end, HONDA (14th) posted the 5th-best pure rhythm according to the analysis, a gap that points to significant time lost either in pit stops or traffic rather than any lack of outright speed. ASTON MARTIN (15th) completed only 58 laps, finishing four laps down on the leaders.
Key takeaways for teams: This final at MKRACING confirmed that raw speed is a necessary but insufficient condition for victory. LOTUS combined the best pure rhythm with an extra stop — and still won comfortably, suggesting their additional pit visit was planned and efficient. BMW's case illustrates that even superior consistency cannot compensate for late-race degradation if stop strategy is not optimised. AUDI's result shows that a solid pace management plan can more than offset a mid-field raw pace. And HONDA's gap between rhythm ranking (5th) and finishing position (14th) is the most striking strategic lesson of the race.
Frequently asked questions
- Who won the 70-minute endurance final at MKRACING on 17 July 2026?
- LOTUS (kart #9) won the endurance final at MKRACING in Saint-Christophe-du-Bois on 17 July 2026, completing 79 laps with the best pure pace median of the race (47.641 s) and making 6 pit stops.
- What was the fastest lap of the race at MKRACING on 17 July 2026, and which team set it?
- The fastest lap of the MKRACING endurance final on 17 July 2026 was set by MERCEDES (kart #6) in a time of 46.009 s.
- How many teams took part in the MKRACING endurance final on 17 July 2026?
- 15 teams took part in the 70-minute endurance final at MKRACING in Saint-Christophe-du-Bois on 17 July 2026.
- Which team was the most consistent during the MKRACING endurance race on 17 July 2026?
- BMW (kart #12) was the most consistent team of the race, recording a lap-time standard deviation of just 0.85 s across all stints during the MKRACING final on 17 July 2026.
- Which team most outperformed its pure pace ranking at MKRACING on 17 July 2026?
- AUDI (kart #13) finished 5th despite holding only the 11th-best pure rhythm, making them the clearest example of strategic overperformance in the MKRACING endurance final on 17 July 2026.
- What was the gap between 1st and 2nd place at the MKRACING endurance final on 17 July 2026?
- MERCEDES finished 9.843 s behind race winner LOTUS at the MKRACING endurance final on 17 July 2026, with CITROËN a further 24 seconds back in third.
Race replay
Loading replay…
Loading chart…
Race analysis
Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show
| Pos | # | Team | Laps | Best | Median pace | Consistency | True pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | LOTUS | 79 | 46.235 | 47.641 | ±1.2s | #1 |
R1 5L · 49.233 · ±1.6 · ↘0.96R2 7L · 47.767 · ±1.1 · ↘0.34R3 17L · 47.457 · ±1.2 · →0.04R4 15L · 47.683 · ±0.8 · →0.04R5 16L · 46.858 · ±0.7 · →0.05R6 10L · 48.471 · ±1.0 · →0.05R7 9L · 47.157 · ±0.8 · ↘0.20 | |||||||
| 2 | 6 | MERCEDES | 80 | 46.009 | 47.910 +0.3 | ±1.8s | #2 |
R1 13L · 48.945 · ±0.9 · →0.12R2 18L · 46.556 · ±2.4 · ↘0.18R3 15L · 48.093 · ±0.7 · →0.06R4 16L · 46.629 · ±1.8 · →0.10R5 11L · 48.222 · ±0.6 · →0.08R6 7L · 47.725 · ±2.3 · →0.04 | |||||||
| 3 | 16 | CITROËN | 80 | 46.236 | 47.922 +0.3 | ±2.1s | #4 |
R1 16L · 47.705 · ±3.6 · ↘0.38R2 14L · 48.832 · ±1.2 · ↘0.15R3 17L · 47.146 · ±2.1 · →0.09R4 14L · 48.268 · ±0.9 · →0.02R5 10L · 47.105 · ±1.3 · →0.15R6 9L · 47.787 · ±0.8 · →0.11 | |||||||
| 4 | 10 | TOYOTA | 79 | 46.755 | 48.388 +0.7 | ±1.1s | #6 |
R1 16L · 47.903 · ±1.1 · →0.06R2 14L · 49.307 · ±1.1 · ↘0.15R3 16L · 47.418 · ±0.6 · →0.01R4 13L · 48.698 · ±0.7 · →0.09R5 11L · 47.359 · ±0.8 · ↘0.20R6 9L · 48.512 · ±0.9 · ↘0.33 | |||||||
| 5 | 13 | AUDI | 79 | 46.878 | 48.533 +0.9 | ±1.3s | #9 |
R1 15L · 48.200 · ±0.3 · →0.01R2 14L · 49.938 · ±1.3 · →0.12R3 15L · 47.726 · ±0.7 · →0.03R4 11L · 49.234 · ±1.0 · ↘0.22R5 15L · 48.013 · ±0.7 · →0.07R6 9L · 48.675 · ±1.0 · ↘0.24 | |||||||
| 6 | 2 | BUGATTI | 78 | 46.940 | 48.674 +1.0 | ±1.2s | #12 |
R1 15L · 48.015 · ±1.1 · →0.12R2 14L · 49.742 · ±1.0 · →0.01R3 14L · 47.374 · ±0.5 · →0.07R4 13L · 49.504 · ±0.6 · →0.09R5 13L · 47.705 · ±0.8 · →0.02R6 9L · 48.780 · ±0.8 · ↘0.27 | |||||||
| 7 | 12 | BMW | 78 | 46.899 | 47.911 +0.3 | ±2.2s | #3 ▲4 |
R1 14L · 47.838 · ±0.7 · →0.07R2 15L · 48.925 · ±0.9 · →0.15R3 16L · 47.519 · ±0.9 · →0.07R4 12L · 47.995 · ±0.6 · →0.03R5 13L · 47.829 · ±0.6 · →0.09R6 8L · 48.356 · ±5.6 · ↘0.30 | |||||||
| 8 | 4 | VOLKSWAGEN | 79 | 47.271 | 48.675 +1.0 | ±1.1s | #13 |
R1 13L · 49.605 · ±1.0 · ↘0.20R2 15L · 48.615 · ±0.9 · →0.09R3 16L · 48.727 · ±0.8 · →0.07R4 12L · 47.911 · ±1.3 · →0.14R5 13L · 48.675 · ±0.8 · →0.11R6 10L · 47.891 · ±1.0 · ↘0.23 | |||||||
| 9 | 8 | PORSCHE | 79 | 46.938 | 48.687 +1.0 | ±1.3s | #14 |
R1 15L · 48.159 · ±1.0 · →0.04R2 14L · 49.731 · ±1.1 · →0.06R3 17L · 48.160 · ±0.7 · →0.03R4 11L · 48.863 · ±0.8 · →0.14R5 14L · 47.519 · ±1.2 · →0.14R6 8L · 49.419 · ±0.8 · →0.13 | |||||||
| 10 | 3 | CHEVROLET | 79 | 47.457 | 48.523 +0.9 | ±1.6s | #8 ▲2 |
R1 13L · 48.737 · ±0.9 · →0.13R2 16L · 48.498 · ±2.5 · →0.08R3 15L · 48.646 · ±1.0 · ↘0.15R4 14L · 48.419 · ±1.9 · →0.12R5 12L · 48.532 · ±1.0 · →0.14R6 9L · 47.891 · ±1.1 · ↘0.18 | |||||||
| 11 | 11 | RENAULT | 77 | 46.835 | 48.573 +0.9 | ±5.9s | #10 ▲1 |
R1 13L · 48.180 · ±2.5 · ↗0.17R2 15L · 49.772 · ±1.3 · ↘0.17R3 15L · 47.519 · ±12.2 · ↗1.18R4 11L · 49.317 · ±3.1 · →0.15R5 15L · 47.829 · ±2.8 · →0.11R6 8L · 48.666 · ±1.9 · ↘0.53 | |||||||
| 12 | 17 | NISSAN | 78 | 47.704 | 48.495 +0.9 | ±1.6s | #7 ▲5 |
R1 13L · 48.696 · ±0.8 · ↘0.16R2 16L · 48.831 · ±2.1 · ↘0.20R3 15L · 48.367 · ±0.7 · →0.09R4 14L · 48.760 · ±2.3 · ↘0.16R5 9L · 49.111 · ±1.0 · →0.11R6 11L · 48.449 · ±0.9 · →0.05 | |||||||
| 13 | 15 | FERRARI | 77 | 46.403 | 49.008 +1.4 | ±5.4s | #15 |
R1 12L · 50.672 · ±0.9 · ↘0.20R2 14L · 46.909 · ±12.0 · ↘0.70R3 20L · 49.814 · ±0.9 · →0.06R4 13L · 47.291 · ±0.9 · →0.05R5 11L · 49.008 · ±2.9 · →0.14R6 7L · 47.478 · ±0.8 · ↘0.21 | |||||||
| 14 | 18 | HONDA | 77 | 46.944 | 48.326 +0.7 | ±9.5s | #5 ▲9 |
R1 14L · 48.450 · ±0.8 · →0.00R2 16L · 48.584 · ±1.4 · ↘0.18R3 14L · 47.808 · ±3.2 · ↘0.35R4 13L · 48.242 · ±0.7 · →0.15R5 12L · 47.954 · ±4.4 · ↘0.74R6 8L · 48.522 · ±27.0 · ↘3.03 | |||||||
| 15 | 5 | ASTON MARTIN | 58 | 47.746 | 49.323 +1.7 | ±7.1s | #16 |
R1 8L · 53.368 · ±0.6 · →0.02R2 17L · 48.686 · ±5.0 · ↘0.22R3 13L · 49.297 · ±1.3 · →0.02R4 13L · 49.090 · ±3.0 · →0.00R5 7L · 50.402 · ±16.9 · ↘1.73 | |||||||
| 15 | 1 | ASTON MARTIN | 19 | 48.056 | 48.657 +1.0 | ±4.3s | #11 ▲4 |
True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).
Finish projectionPodium predicted : 1/3
At 80% distance (~14 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:
| Projected | Team | Projected gap | Actual finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MERCEDES #6 | — | P2 (+1) |
| 2 | LOTUS #9 | +37.1s | P1 (-1) |
| 3 | CITROËN #16 | +50.8s | P3 ✓ |
| 4 | HONDA #18 | +56.8s | P14 (+10) |
| 5 | AUDI #13 | +58.2s | P5 ✓ |
| 6 | TOYOTA #10 | +59.6s | P4 (-2) |
| 7 | BUGATTI #2 | +59.6s | P6 (-1) |
| 8 | BMW #12 | +1:38 | P7 (-1) |
| 9 | NISSAN #17 | +1:48 | P12 (+3) |
| 10 | CHEVROLET #3 | +1:49 | P10 ✓ |
Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).
Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you
- ✓ Per-driver analysis
- ✓ Finish projection
- ✓ Pit wall
- ✓ Live strategy and alerts
- ✓ Post-race debrief
€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.
Go Pro →Final classification
| Pos. | Δ | Kart | Driver | Nat. | S1 | S2 | S3 | Last lap | Best lap | Gap | Interval | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲8 | 9 | LOTUS | 46.298 | 46.235 | Tour 86 | 85 | |||||
| 2 | – | 6 | MERCEDES | 46.692 | 46.009 | 9.843 | 85 | |||||
| 3 | ▲5 | 16 | CITROËN | 48.015 | 46.236 | 34.036 | 85 | |||||
| 4 | ▲2 | 10 | TOYOTA | 47.954 | 46.755 | 1 Tour | 84 | |||||
| 5 | – | 13 | AUDI | 48.675 | 46.878 | 10.627 | 84 | |||||
| 6 | ▲4 | 2 | BUGATTI | 48.780 | 46.940 | 16.872 | 83 | |||||
| 7 | ▲4 | 12 | BMW | 48.449 | 46.899 | 20.244 | 83 | |||||
| 8 | ▼1 | 4 | VOLKSWAGEN | 47.456 | 47.271 | 24.089 | 84 | |||||
| 9 | ▼5 | 8 | PORSCHE | 49.840 | 46.938 | 27.626 | 84 | |||||
| 10 | ▲4 | 3 | CHEVROLET | 48.222 | 47.457 | 29.052 | 84 | |||||
| 11 | ▼8 | 11 | RENAULT | 48.510 | 46.835 | 2 Tours | 82 | |||||
| 12 | ▲3 | 17 | NISSAN | 48.444 | 47.704 | 7.833 | 83 | |||||
| 13 | ▼12 | 15 | FERRARI | 47.622 | 46.403 | 8.417 | 82 | |||||
| 14 | ▼2 | 18 | HONDA | 48.511 | 46.944 | 3 Tours | 82 | |||||
| 15 | ▼2 | 5 | ASTON MARTIN | 49.245 | 47.746 | 4 Tours | 61 |
🏆 Pro Teams