100 MILES #10 · Finale Race⏱ 2h02

Ukraine SWS Racing took the top step of the podium at the Karting Genk endurance final on 6 August 2026, completing 93 laps of the 1,360-metre Track PRO over 121 minutes ahead of 38 other teams — the largest field of the day.

The winning kart #75 crossed the line 11.104 seconds ahead of Incidentmelder Racing 2 (kart #82, 93 laps), who secured second place. Bow Racing (kart #47) completed the podium a further 12.218 seconds back, also on 93 laps, with North South Racing (kart #61) and Team Waffel Manneke (kart #65) rounding out the top five — all on the same lap count. The best lap of the entire race was set by Bow Racing in 1:11.187.

The analysis reveals that Ukraine SWS Racing was not only the fastest team on the road but also the most effective overall: their median race pace of 1:11.837 ranked first among all teams, supported by an excellent consistency figure of ±0.78 s. Across four stints — the longest of which covered 35 laps — the team delivered uniformly stable performances, never showing signs of drop-off.

Incidentmelder Racing 2 confirmed their runner-up position with the second-best pure pace (1:11.977 median) and remarkable regularity (±0.76 s). Their third stint of 34 laps, with a median of 1:11.719, was their strongest phase of the race. Team Waffel Manneke (5th) posted the third-best pace on pure terms (1:12.010 median), but their middle stints — particularly stint 3 (1:13.152 median over 10 laps) — cost them positions on the road. Their final stint (1:11.747 over 21 laps) showed a strong recovery.

North South Racing (4th, rythme médian 1:12.042, 4th in pace ranking) managed four stints with generally stable splits. Their second stint (11 laps, 1:12.929 median) was noticeably slower, but a long third stint of 33 laps at 1:11.851 rebuilt their pace effectively. Bow Racing, despite signing the fastest lap of the race (1:11.187) and posting strong individual stints, ranked only 5th in pure pace (1:12.160 median), which meant their ultimate pace potential didn't fully translate into an equivalent finishing position.

Further back, PANTHAA by Outlux (8th) is a standout case: ranked only 11th in pure pace (1:12.960 median) with the highest consistency spread in the analysed group (±1.20 s), their alternating fast and slower stints suggest a multi-driver rotation with a significant pace differential between drivers. JCR-Epyon (kart #98, 29th) is the most striking anomaly of the race: ranked 8th in pure pace but classified 29th, having covered only 53 laps — a result that clearly reflects significant time lost at the circuit, though the data does not specify the cause. The team nonetheless displayed the best consistency figure of any team (±0.52 s), demonstrating exceptional regularity during the laps they did complete. At the other end of the strategic spectrum, Peugeot Vanhees Rookie (21st) finished six positions ahead of their pure pace ranking (27th), illustrating effective race management.

Key takeaways for teams: At Karting Genk, the combination of top-end pace and consistent stint management proved decisive — Ukraine SWS Racing's dominance in both categories left no room for rivals. Teams with strong single-stint pace but significant inter-driver gaps (such as Panthaa by Outlux) sacrifice overall rhythm. Track position and lap-count completion remained critical: raw speed, as shown by JCR-Epyon's case, counts for nothing if a team cannot complete the race distance. Three pit stops was the universal strategy across the field, with only AMTC Racing and CMP Racing making five stops — both finishing in the bottom two of the classified runners.