FAL Séjour 1 END · Finale Race⏱ 1h32
KARTING DE PERS
Piste Karting (1105m) — — 8 drivers
- Winner
MERCEDES (#39)- Gap P1-P2
- 27.336
- Best lap
- 1:08.795 — TEAM NASDAS
- Teams
- 8
- Duration
- 1h31
- Stops (winner)
- 5
Endurance Final – Karting de Pers (1105 m) · 9 July 2026
The 91-minute endurance final held on 9 July 2026 at Karting de Pers (Pers, 1,105-metre circuit) brought together eight teams for a demanding race that tested both pace and pit-stop strategy. When the chequered flag fell, it was MERCEDES (kart #39) who took the victory, finishing one lap clear of the chasing pack after completing 70 laps.
RED BULL (kart #32) secured second place with 71 laps covered, crossing the line 27.336 seconds ahead of LES CHAISES (kart #50), who completed the podium also on 71 laps but a further 48.779 seconds back. MARIE (kart #49) finished fourth, one lap down, while TEAM NASDAS (kart #27) came home fifth, two laps adrift, followed by BM (kart #48), LES ADIDAS (kart #47) and FERRARI (kart #41), the latter three all completing 68 laps. The fastest lap of the race was set by TEAM NASDAS in a time of 1:08.795.
The pace analysis reveals a striking contrast between outright speed and race result. TEAM NASDAS posted the best pure pace of the field with a median race rhythm of 1:09.645 — nearly two seconds per lap faster than the race winner — yet finished only fifth. Their data shows just four recorded stints, suggesting significant time was lost in the pits or on track, preventing them from converting their raw speed into a competitive result.
MERCEDES owed their victory largely to strategic execution. Their median race rhythm of 1:11.548 placed them only second on pure pace, but five well-managed pit stops and consistent stints were enough to clinch the win. Their even-numbered stints (relais 2, 4 and 6) were rock-solid, with a regularity of 0.36 s and 0.31 s respectively, while their odd stints — with medians around 1:14.5 to 1:15 — highlight a clear two-driver performance split within the team.
RED BULL were the standout story of the race in terms of strategy. Fourth on pure pace (median 1:11.754), they converted that into second place on the road — the biggest positive gap between rhythm ranking and final position in the field. Their consistency was the best of any team, with an overall standard deviation of just 1.23 seconds, and every single one of their six stints was rated stable or improving. Their final stint of 14 laps at a median of 1:11.371 was a model of endurance management.
LES CHAISES matched RED BULL on lap count and held third on pure pace (1:11.618 median), but a slightly higher variability (2.48 s) and a small degradation in stint 5 (+0.18 s/lap) ultimately cost them the fight for second. FERRARI showed the heaviest degradation of the race: their second stint dropped at 0.54 seconds per lap, the sharpest single-stint decline recorded across all eight teams.
Key takeaways for teams: at Karting de Pers, raw speed alone does not win endurance races — RED BULL's victory on strategy over pace proves that consistency and clean pit-stop execution are worth multiple lap-time seconds over 91 minutes. Teams with strong pace must also manage total pit-lane time carefully, as TEAM NASDAS's fifth-place finish with the fastest median rhythm in the field demonstrates. Controlling degradation across all stints, particularly the odd-numbered driver changes, is the area where MERCEDES still have margin to gain.
Frequently asked questions
- Who won the endurance final at Karting de Pers on 9 July 2026?
- MERCEDES (kart #39) won the 91-minute endurance final at Karting de Pers on 9 July 2026, completing 70 laps and finishing one lap ahead of second-placed RED BULL.
- What was the fastest lap of the race, and which team set it?
- The fastest lap of the endurance final at Karting de Pers on 9 July 2026 was a 1:08.795, set by TEAM NASDAS (kart #27).
- How many teams took part in the Karting de Pers endurance final on 9 July 2026?
- Eight teams competed in the endurance final at Karting de Pers on 9 July 2026, racing over 91 minutes on the 1,105-metre circuit.
- Which team had the best pure pace at Karting de Pers on 9 July 2026, and where did they finish?
- TEAM NASDAS recorded the best pure pace of the race at Karting de Pers on 9 July 2026, with a median race rhythm of 1:09.645, but finished only fifth despite having the fastest median lap time in the field.
- Which team was the most consistent at Karting de Pers on 9 July 2026?
- RED BULL was the most consistent team at the Karting de Pers endurance final on 9 July 2026, posting the lowest lap-time standard deviation of the field at 1.23 seconds across 71 laps and five pit stops.
- What made the difference between RED BULL's pace ranking and their final position at Karting de Pers?
- At the Karting de Pers final on 9 July 2026, RED BULL ranked only fourth on pure pace but finished second on the road — the biggest positive gain in the field — thanks to exemplary consistency across all six stints and clean pit-stop management throughout the 91 minutes.
Race replay
Loading replay…
Loading chart…
Race analysis
Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show
| Pos | # | Team | Laps | Best | Median pace | Consistency | True pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | MERCEDES | 70 | 1:10.285 | 1:12.601 +0.8 | ±12.6s | #4 |
R1 10L · 1:14.731 · ±1.4 · ↘0.21R2 12L · 1:10.874 · ±14.2 · ↘2.02R3 11L · 1:16.281 · ±9.9 · ↘1.10R4 12L · 1:10.864 · ±12.6 · ↘1.79R5 11L · 1:14.793 · ±15.9 · →0.08R6 14L · 1:11.102 · ±12.8 · ↘1.48 | |||||||
| 2 | 32 | RED BULL | 71 | 1:10.368 | 1:11.815 | ±17.3s | #1 ▲1 |
R1 10L · 1:13.976 · ±1.2 · →0.11R2 12L · 1:11.691 · ±11.4 · ↘1.59R3 11L · 1:13.448 · ±22.6 · ↗0.72R4 12L · 1:11.351 · ±25.8 · ↘3.71R5 11L · 1:12.641 · ±19.5 · ↘3.02R6 15L · 1:11.403 · ±8.8 · ↘0.84 | |||||||
| 3 | 50 | LES CHAISES | 71 | 1:09.602 | 1:12.374 +0.6 | ±18.2s | #3 |
R1 10L · 1:15.175 · ±1.6 · →0.05R2 12L · 1:10.792 · ±20.5 · ↘2.80R3 11L · 1:14.980 · ±15.3 · ↘2.41R4 12L · 1:10.244 · ±28.3 · ↘3.93R5 11L · 1:14.627 · ±17.8 · ↘2.67R6 15L · 1:10.781 · ±12.3 · ↘1.26 | |||||||
| 4 | 49 | MARIE | 70 | 1:09.417 | 1:13.262 +1.4 | ±15.1s | #5 |
R1 10L · 1:16.757 · ±1.9 · ↘0.46R2 12L · 1:10.833 · ±20.4 · ↘2.81R3 10L · 1:17.429 · ±19.7 · ↘3.40R4 12L · 1:11.763 · ±16.2 · ↘2.35R5 11L · 1:17.212 · ±13.1 · ↘1.83R6 15L · 1:10.990 · ±8.5 · ↘0.96 | |||||||
| 5 | 27 | TEAM NASDAS | 69 | 1:08.795 | 1:11.815 | ±17.1s | #2 ▲3 |
R1 9L · 1:23.043 · ±3.1 · ↘0.55R2 12L · 1:10.131 · ±23.0 · ↘3.26R3 10L · 1:20.655 · ±18.7 · ↘3.87R4 12L · 1:09.292 · ±21.9 · ↘3.00R5 11L · 1:19.176 · ±10.6 · ↘2.39R6 15L · 1:09.291 · ±10.4 · ↘0.92 | |||||||
| 6 | 48 | BM | 68 | 1:10.535 | 1:14.865 +3.0 | ±18.1s | #7 |
R1 10L · 1:17.120 · ±0.8 · →0.10R2 11L · 1:12.456 · ±26.7 · ↘4.36R3 11L · 1:15.475 · ±16.2 · ↘2.61R4 12L · 1:12.136 · ±24.1 · ↘3.40R5 11L · 1:17.977 · ±15.1 · ↘2.55R6 13L · 1:12.787 · ±11.1 · ↘1.31 | |||||||
| 7 | 47 | LES ADIDAS | 68 | 1:12.869 | 1:15.022 +3.2 | ±14.9s | #8 |
R1 1L · 2:23.216 · ±0.0 · →0.00R2 7L · 1:20.190 · ±7.8 · ↘2.44R3 12L · 1:13.965 · ±10.8 · ↘1.81R4 11L · 1:14.958 · ±12.3 · ↘1.42R5 12L · 1:13.635 · ±19.2 · ↘2.73R6 11L · 1:16.964 · ±12.7 · ↘1.83R7 14L · 1:15.022 · ±9.6 · ↘1.14 | |||||||
| 8 | 41 | FERRARI | 68 | 1:11.878 | 1:14.203 +2.4 | ±16.3s | #6 ▲2 |
R1 9L · 1:23.045 · ±3.5 · ↘0.36R2 12L · 1:13.299 · ±18.5 · ↘2.65R3 10L · 1:16.633 · ±20.9 · ↘3.91R4 12L · 1:12.673 · ±15.3 · ↘2.24R5 11L · 1:20.561 · ±16.8 · ↘2.46R6 14L · 1:13.646 · ±13.9 · ↘1.44 | |||||||
True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).
Finish projectionPodium predicted : 1/3
At 80% distance (~18 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:
| Projected | Team | Projected gap | Actual finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RED BULL #32 | — | P2 (+1) |
| 2 | MERCEDES #39 | +24.2s | P1 (-1) |
| 3 | LES CHAISES #50 | +30.2s | P3 ✓ |
| 4 | MARIE #49 | +2:12 | P4 ✓ |
| 5 | LES ADIDAS #47 | +2:18 | P7 (+2) |
| 6 | BM #48 | +3:18 | P6 ✓ |
| 7 | TEAM NASDAS #27 | +4:09 | P5 (-2) |
| 8 | FERRARI #41 | +4:45 | P8 ✓ |
Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).
Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you
- ✓ Per-driver analysis
- ✓ Finish projection
- ✓ Pit wall
- ✓ Live strategy and alerts
- ✓ Post-race debrief
€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.
Go Pro →Final classification
| Pos. | Δ | Kart | Driver | Nat. | S1 | S2 | S3 | Last lap | Best lap | Gap | Interval | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲2 | 39 | MERCEDES | 1:10.595 | 1:10.285 | Tour 72 | 70 | |||||
| 2 | – | 32 | RED BULL | 1:14.027 | 1:10.368 | 27.336 | 71 | |||||
| 3 | ▼2 | 50 | LES CHAISES | 1:11.608 | 1:09.602 | 48.779 | 71 | |||||
| 4 | ▲1 | 49 | MARIE | 1:09.479 | 1:09.417 | 1 Tour | 70 | |||||
| 5 | ▲1 | 27 | TEAM NASDAS | 1:10.516 | 1:08.795 | 2 Tours | 69 | |||||
| 6 | ▲1 | 48 | BM | 1:13.531 | 1:10.535 | 10.480 | 68 | |||||
| 7 | ▼3 | 47 | LES ADIDAS | 1:15.042 | 1:12.869 | 3 Tours | 68 | |||||
| 8 | – | 41 | FERRARI | 1:13.677 | 1:11.878 | 21.588 | 68 |
🏆 Pro Teams