- Kart-Center
- France
- KARTING CIRCUIT PAUL RICARD
- Results & archive
- CHALLENGE CLAIR GROUP · Course
CHALLENGE CLAIR GROUP · Course Race⏱ 1h22
KARTING CIRCUIT PAUL RICARD
Karting Paul Ricard (964m) — — 19 drivers
- Winner
BERLIN (#14)- Gap P1-P2
- 1 Tour
- Best lap
- 1:02.302 — BERLIN
- Teams
- 19
- Duration
- 1h22
- Stops (winner)
- 5
82-Min Endurance Race Report – Karting Circuit Paul Ricard
On 26 September 2026, the Karting Circuit Paul Ricard (964 m) hosted an 82-minute endurance race that brought together 19 teams. At the chequered flag, it was BERLIN (kart #14) who claimed victory with 68 laps completed, crossing the line a full lap clear of the field and setting the fastest lap of the entire race — a 1:02.302.
TOKYO (kart #6) secured second place with 67 laps, finishing 1 lap behind the winner. Despite posting only the 3rd-best median pace (1:04.673), the team delivered a remarkable final stint, clocking a median of 1:03.052 in relay 6 — their fastest of the race — and gaining ground in the closing stages. LOS ANGELES (kart #2) rounded out the podium in third, also on 67 laps, 28.401 seconds behind Tokyo, with the 5th-best pace on pure rhythm (median 1:05.050) and consistent regularity (σ = 1.41 s). PORTO (kart #11) finished fourth on the same lap count, 42.082 seconds back, and was the most consistent team of the entire race with a standard deviation of just 1.20 s across all stints.
The performance of the day, beyond the result, was that of BERLIN: the team topped both the final standings and the pure pace rankings with a median lap time of 1:03.708 — a rare double that left no room for debate. Their relays alternated between fast, stable stints (relay 1: σ = 0.54 s; relay 3: σ = 0.63 s) and slightly slower but controlled phases. Relays 5 and 6 both showed a positive trend, gaining 0.19 s/lap and 0.26 s/lap respectively, illustrating a team that finished the race stronger than it started.
The strategic highlight of the race came from ST TROPEZ (kart #17), who finished 5th overall despite ranking only 12th on pure pace (median 1:06.813, σ = 2.43 s). Conversely, NEW YORK (kart #4) presented the starkest gap between speed and result: ranked 2nd on pure rhythm but finishing only 13th, the team's median pace was clearly not converted into track position over the full 82 minutes.
SINGAPOUR (kart #5) also caught the eye analytically: 6th on pure pace, but 11th in the final standings. With the highest irregularity of the analysed field (σ = 3.56 s), their race featured strong stints at around 1:04 followed by sharply slower phases, including a relay 5 where pace declined by 0.39 s/lap. SHANGHAI (kart #13), on the other hand, built throughout the race — from a 1:09.328 median in relay 1 down to 1:05.082 in the final stint — finishing 7th from 9th on pace.
At the back of the field, ROME (kart #24) recorded the steepest pace degradation of any team across a single relay: slowing by 1.37 s/lap during their opening stint, the team completed only 26 laps and finished 18th. BRUXELLES (kart #10) made 6 pit stops — one more than the majority of the field — and crossed the line 19th on laps (data not captured), while LONDRES (kart #16) also made 6 stops and ended the race 15 tours down.
Key takeaways for teams: BERLIN demonstrated that dominating both raw pace and race management is the surest path to victory. PORTO's regularity (σ = 1.20 s) shows the value of consistency across long stints. ST TROPEZ's top-5 finish from 12th on pace underlines the decisive impact of strategic execution. For teams like NEW YORK and SINGAPOUR, converting strong raw speed into race results will be the challenge to address at the next outing on the Paul Ricard karting circuit.
Frequently asked questions
- Who won the endurance race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 26 September 2026?
- BERLIN (kart #14) won the 82-minute endurance race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 26 September 2026, completing 68 laps and finishing a full lap ahead of the rest of the 19-team field.
- What was the fastest lap of the race and which team set it?
- The fastest lap of the race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 26 September 2026 was a 1:02.302, set by BERLIN (kart #14).
- How many teams competed in the Paul Ricard karting endurance race on 26 September 2026?
- 19 teams took the start of the 82-minute endurance race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 26 September 2026.
- Which team showed the best pure pace without finishing on the podium?
- NEW YORK (kart #4) ranked 2nd on pure rhythm across the race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 26 September 2026, yet finished only 13th overall — the biggest gap between speed and final result on the day.
- Which team was the most consistent during the 26 September 2026 race at Paul Ricard?
- PORTO (kart #11) was the most consistent team, with the lowest lap time standard deviation of the race (σ = 1.20 s). They finished 4th at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 26 September 2026.
- Which team most outperformed their pure pace ranking in the final standings?
- ST TROPEZ (kart #17) finished 5th overall despite ranking only 12th on pure pace, making them the standout strategic performer of the 26 September 2026 endurance race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard.
Race replay
Loading replay…
Loading chart…
Race analysis
Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show
| Pos | # | Team | Laps | Best | Median pace | Consistency | True pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | BERLIN | 68 | 1:02.302 | 1:03.720 | ±2.0s | #1 |
R1 12L · 1:03.407 · ±0.5 · →0.08R2 13L · 1:05.441 · ±2.6 · ↗0.20R3 12L · 1:03.215 · ±0.6 · →0.02R4 13L · 1:05.146 · ±1.5 · →0.08R5 9L · 1:02.791 · ±1.2 · ↘0.19R6 9L · 1:03.459 · ±1.8 · ↘0.26 | |||||||
| 2 | 6 | TOKYO | 67 | 1:02.694 | 1:04.690 +1.0 | ±1.8s | #2 |
R1 12L · 1:05.636 · ±0.7 · →0.10R2 13L · 1:04.329 · ±1.7 · ↘0.20R3 12L · 1:05.282 · ±2.7 · ↗0.19R4 13L · 1:04.012 · ±0.6 · →0.11R5 8L · 1:05.219 · ±1.0 · ↘0.19R6 9L · 1:03.052 · ±1.4 · ↘0.40 | |||||||
| 3 | 2 | LOS ANGELES | 67 | 1:03.711 | 1:05.069 +1.3 | ±2.4s | #4 |
R1 12L · 1:04.528 · ±0.4 · →0.02R2 12L · 1:06.272 · ±4.3 · ↘0.61R3 13L · 1:04.587 · ±0.7 · →0.11R4 12L · 1:06.049 · ±1.2 · →0.10R5 9L · 1:04.197 · ±2.1 · ↘0.35R6 9L · 1:05.193 · ±1.1 · →0.11 | |||||||
| 4 | 11 | PORTO | 67 | 1:03.499 | 1:05.053 +1.3 | ±2.1s | #3 ▲1 |
R1 12L · 1:05.276 · ±1.2 · →0.10R2 12L · 1:05.384 · ±3.3 · ↘0.31R3 12L · 1:04.966 · ±2.6 · ↘0.31R4 13L · 1:04.947 · ±1.0 · →0.11R5 8L · 1:04.905 · ±1.2 · ↘0.42R6 10L · 1:04.692 · ±0.7 · →0.01 | |||||||
| 5 | 17 | ST TROPEZ | 65 | 1:03.655 | 1:07.170 +3.5 | ±3.3s | #9 |
R1 12L · 1:04.182 · ±0.5 · →0.04R2 12L · 1:10.185 · ±2.4 · ↘0.33R3 12L · 1:04.453 · ±3.0 · ↘0.32R4 12L · 1:07.953 · ±2.8 · ↘0.56R5 8L · 1:04.704 · ±1.1 · ↘0.38R6 9L · 1:07.603 · ±0.5 · →0.01 | |||||||
| 6 | 15 | PRAGUE | 64 | 1:04.838 | 1:06.855 +3.1 | ±3.2s | #8 |
R1 12L · 1:06.892 · ±4.4 · ↘0.60R2 11L · 1:08.849 · ±1.4 · ↘0.32R3 12L · 1:06.452 · ±1.1 · ↘0.23R4 12L · 1:07.347 · ±4.2 · ↘0.41R5 8L · 1:05.921 · ±1.3 · →0.14R6 9L · 1:06.212 · ±3.2 · ↗0.37 | |||||||
| 7 | 13 | SHANGHAI | 65 | 1:04.279 | 1:06.422 +2.7 | ±2.7s | #6 ▲1 |
R1 11L · 1:09.767 · ±3.5 · ↘0.20R2 13L · 1:07.422 · ±3.1 · →0.01R3 11L · 1:06.422 · ±1.0 · →0.15R4 13L · 1:05.634 · ±1.0 · →0.15R5 7L · 1:05.187 · ±1.3 · ↘0.42R6 10L · 1:05.082 · ±0.8 · →0.13 | |||||||
| 8 | 9 | LISBONNE | 65 | 1:03.682 | 1:06.362 +2.6 | ±4.1s | #5 ▲3 |
R1 12L · 1:04.572 · ±0.5 · →0.06R2 11L · 1:10.392 · ±3.5 · ↘0.39R3 13L · 1:04.242 · ±3.5 · ↗0.34R4 13L · 1:08.043 · ±3.7 · →0.01R5 7L · 1:04.164 · ±1.0 · ↘0.36R6 9L · 1:07.547 · ±2.9 · →0.14 | |||||||
| 9 | 21 | MADRID | 65 | 1:05.089 | 1:07.876 +4.2 | ±20.4s | #10 |
R1 12L · 1:08.813 · ±45.3 · ↘6.46R2 12L · 1:08.909 · ±1.7 · ↘0.31R3 12L · 1:06.680 · ±1.0 · →0.09R4 12L · 1:07.269 · ±1.2 · →0.10R5 8L · 1:06.247 · ±1.4 · ↘0.35R6 9L · 1:06.869 · ±1.9 · ↗0.27 | |||||||
| 10 | 18 | CARACAS | 64 | 1:03.954 | 1:06.806 +3.1 | ±4.0s | #7 ▲3 |
R1 12L · 1:06.639 · ±3.6 · →0.03R2 11L · 1:10.686 · ±2.8 · →0.02R3 12L · 1:06.082 · ±1.3 · →0.13R4 12L · 1:07.723 · ±6.1 · ↘0.60R5 8L · 1:05.844 · ±1.2 · →0.06R6 9L · 1:07.426 · ±1.7 · →0.14 | |||||||
| 11 | 5 | SINGAPOUR | 64 | 1:03.279 | 1:08.436 +4.7 | ±5.1s | #13 |
R1 12L · 1:03.996 · ±0.8 · →0.06R2 12L · 1:12.040 · ±2.4 · →0.08R3 11L · 1:03.900 · ±1.3 · →0.10R4 12L · 1:12.997 · ±1.0 · ↘0.15R5 8L · 1:03.971 · ±1.0 · →0.14R6 9L · 1:10.706 · ±6.4 · ↘1.05 | |||||||
| 12 | 3 | MEXICO | 63 | 1:03.766 | 1:08.198 +4.5 | ±4.7s | #12 |
R1 11L · 1:08.988 · ±2.4 · ↘0.59R2 12L · 1:08.751 · ±1.3 · →0.10R3 11L · 1:09.217 · ±8.6 · ↗0.46R4 12L · 1:04.925 · ±1.8 · ↘0.17R5 8L · 1:06.991 · ±1.9 · ↘0.73R6 9L · 1:06.752 · ±2.7 · ↗0.16 | |||||||
| 13 | 4 | NEW YORK | 63 | 1:03.086 | 1:10.281 +6.6 | ±6.0s | #18 |
R1 12L · 1:03.963 · ±0.5 · →0.10R2 11L · 1:18.416 · ±2.8 · ↘0.64R3 11L · 1:04.637 · ±3.8 · ↘0.50R4 12L · 1:13.201 · ±1.1 · ↘0.21R5 8L · 1:04.477 · ±5.1 · ↘0.27R6 9L · 1:10.674 · ±1.2 · ↘0.31 | |||||||
| 14 | 19 | PARIS | 62 | 1:04.945 | 1:08.950 +5.2 | ±5.4s | #14 |
R1 11L · 1:07.895 · ±10.7 · ↗1.57R2 11L · 1:12.297 · ±2.0 · ↘0.22R3 12L · 1:06.020 · ±1.4 · →0.07R4 11L · 1:10.590 · ±2.2 · ↘0.61R5 8L · 1:06.314 · ±3.0 · ↘0.57R6 9L · 1:09.216 · ±1.6 · ↘0.28 | |||||||
| 15 | 7 | SIDNEY | 60 | 1:05.644 | 1:10.501 +6.8 | ±6.6s | #19 |
R1 11L · 1:07.933 · ±1.6 · →0.01R2 10L · 1:22.378 · ±6.2 · ↘1.91R3 11L · 1:06.744 · ±1.2 · ↘0.20R4 12L · 1:12.755 · ±1.5 · ↘0.21R5 8L · 1:06.748 · ±0.9 · ↘0.24R6 8L · 1:12.475 · ±1.6 · →0.08 | |||||||
| 16 | 10 | BRUXELLES | 59 | 1:04.239 | 1:08.043 +4.3 | ±7.0s | #11 ▲5 |
R1 11L · 1:10.290 · ±0.9 · ↗0.22R2 12L · 1:06.581 · ±11.1 · ↘1.17R3 12L · 1:05.372 · ±3.8 · ↗0.38R4 7L · 1:17.189 · ±6.4 · ↗0.32R5 8L · 1:05.442 · ±1.3 · ↘0.41R6 9L · 1:09.114 · ±2.1 · →0.07 | |||||||
| 17 | 8 | MILAN | 58 | 1:07.428 | 1:13.492 +9.8 | ±4.7s | #20 |
R1 10L · 1:13.909 · ±2.3 · ↘0.33R2 11L · 1:14.805 · ±4.7 · ↗0.62R3 10L · 1:14.638 · ±3.0 · →0.06R4 11L · 1:10.943 · ±5.7 · ↘0.99R5 8L · 1:11.134 · ±4.9 · ↗0.49R6 8L · 1:09.831 · ±3.9 · ↗0.91 | |||||||
| 18 | 20 | ROME | 33 | 1:03.258 | 1:09.492 +5.8 | ±6.0s | #16 ▲2 |
R1 11L · 1:15.922 · ±5.1 · ↗1.55R2 11L · 1:10.932 · ±5.2 · ↘0.79R3 11L · 1:04.053 · ±1.3 · ↘0.17 | |||||||
| 18 | 24 | ROME | 26 | 1:03.258 | 1:09.526 +5.8 | ±28.3s | #17 ▲1 |
R1 10L · 1:09.774 · ±26.9 · ↘4.89R2 16L · 1:09.020 · ±29.2 · ↘1.36 | |||||||
| 19 | 1 | LONDRES | 22 | 1:05.676 | 1:09.438 +5.7 | ±12.4s | #15 ▲4 |
R1 12L · 1:07.246 · ±1.4 · ↘0.27R2 8L · 1:32.559 · ±3.6 · ↘0.83R3 2L · 1:23.215 · ±0.7 · →0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 16 | LONDRES | 32 | 1:04.141 | 1:25.915 +22.2 | ±12.6s | #21 |
R1 8L · 1:06.795 · ±16.1 · ↘4.58R2 10L · 1:28.988 · ±3.6 · ↘0.42R3 7L · 1:06.114 · ±1.2 · ↘0.30R4 7L · 1:26.105 · ±1.7 · ↘0.43 | |||||||
True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).
Finish projectionPodium predicted : 2/3
At 80% distance (~16 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:
| Projected | Team | Projected gap | Actual finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BERLIN #14 | — | P1 ✓ |
| 2 | TOKYO #6 | +1:15 | P2 ✓ |
| 3 | PORTO #11 | +2:25 | P4 (+1) |
| 4 | LOS ANGELES #2 | +2:28 | P3 (-1) |
| 5 | LISBONNE #9 | +3:49 | P8 (+3) |
| 6 | ST TROPEZ #17 | +3:57 | P5 (-1) |
| 7 | MADRID #21 | +4:25 | P9 (+2) |
| 8 | SHANGHAI #13 | +5:04 | P7 (-1) |
| 9 | CARACAS #18 | +5:06 | P10 (+1) |
| 10 | SINGAPOUR #5 | +5:06 | P11 (+1) |
Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).
Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you
- ✓ Per-driver analysis
- ✓ Finish projection
- ✓ Pit wall
- ✓ Live strategy and alerts
- ✓ Post-race debrief
€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.
Go Pro →Final classification
| Pos. | Δ | Kart | Driver | Nat. | S1 | S2 | S3 | Last lap | Best lap | Gap | Interval | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | 14 | BERLIN | 1:03.625 | 1:02.302 | Tour 74 | 73 | |||||
| 2 | ▲1 | 6 | TOKYO | 1:03.052 | 1:02.694 | 1 Tour | 72 | |||||
| 3 | ▲3 | 2 | LOS ANGELES | 1:06.226 | 1:03.711 | 28.401 | 72 | |||||
| 4 | ▲4 | 11 | PORTO | 1:05.384 | 1:03.499 | 42.082 | 72 | |||||
| 5 | – | 17 | ST TROPEZ | 1:07.543 | 1:03.655 | 3 Tours | 70 | |||||
| 6 | ▲10 | 15 | PRAGUE | 1:15.852 | 1:04.838 | 42.679 | 69 | |||||
| 7 | ▲7 | 13 | SHANGHAI | 1:05.025 | 1:04.279 | 43.587 | 70 | |||||
| 8 | ▼1 | 9 | LISBONNE | 1:14.043 | 1:03.682 | 44.669 | 70 | |||||
| 9 | ▲2 | 21 | MADRID | 1:12.505 | 1:05.089 | 4 Tours | 70 | |||||
| 10 | ▼1 | 18 | CARACAS | 1:10.561 | 1:03.954 | 17.749 | 69 | |||||
| 11 | ▼7 | 5 | SINGAPOUR | 1:12.594 | 1:03.279 | 35.521 | 69 | |||||
| 12 | ▲6 | 3 | MEXICO | 1:14.108 | 1:03.766 | 5 Tours | 68 | |||||
| 13 | ▼11 | 4 | NEW YORK | 1:10.252 | 1:03.086 | 30.441 | 68 | |||||
| 14 | ▼1 | 19 | PARIS | 1:10.509 | 1:04.945 | 6 Tours | 67 | |||||
| 15 | ▼3 | 7 | SIDNEY | 1:12.485 | 1:05.644 | 8 Tours | 65 | |||||
| 16 | ▼1 | 10 | BRUXELLES | 1:12.292 | 1:04.239 | 9 Tours | 64 | |||||
| 17 | ▲2 | 8 | MILAN | 1:20.593 | 1:07.428 | 10 Tours | 63 | |||||
| 18 | 24 | ROME | 1:03.406 | 1:03.258 | 23.334 | 27 | ||||||
| 19 | 16 | LONDRES | 1:26.105 | 1:04.141 | 15 Tours | 35 |
🏎️ 3D tracks