1 H 30 Circuit Laval Beausoleil · Finale Race1h47

CIRCUIT BEAUSOLEIL - LAVAL

Circuit Beausoleil 1220M — — 11 drivers

Winner
TOYOTA (#3)
Gap P1-P2
1 Tour
Best lap
1:03.531 — RENAULT
Teams
11
Duration
1h46
Stops (winner)
6

Endurance Final – Circuit Beausoleil Laval, 9 July 2026

The 106-minute endurance final at Circuit Beausoleil (1,220 m) in Laval brought together 11 teams on 9 July 2026 for a demanding race that tested both pace and strategy over more than 70 laps.

TOYOTA (kart #3) took the victory with 77 laps completed, crossing the line a full lap ahead of the chasing pack. FORD (#24) and PORSCHE (#17) shared second and third place on 76 laps, separated only by their respective lap times at the flag. LOTUS (#4), PEUGEOT (#20), RENAULT (#2), and LAMBORGHINI (#18) all finished on 76 laps as well, while ALPINE (#13) was classified eighth at 3 laps down, and ALPHA ROMEO (#26), FERRARI (#7), and TESLA (#1) rounded out the top 11 at 4 laps adrift.

The fastest lap of the race was set by RENAULT with a 1:03.531 — the sharpest single lap of the afternoon. Yet that raw speed did not translate into results: RENAULT finished only sixth despite holding the 2nd best median race pace (1:05.001) across their 75 timed laps. Their six stints showed strong acceleration phases — three stints where they progressively gained time lap by lap — but also significant swings in pace between stints, reflected in the highest consistency spread among the frontrunners (σ = 1.85 s). The alternate fast and slower stints suggest a demanding driving style that was hard to sustain uniformly over the full race distance.

ALPINE (#13) is the most striking story of the race: they posted the best median race pace of the entire field (1:04.957), yet finished eighth, 3 laps down. Their six stints were consistently fast — including a final stint with a median of 1:03.791 — and their regularity (σ = 1.22 s) was solid. The gap to the leading teams was clearly accumulated at the pit stops or during on-track incidents, not through any lack of outright speed.

TOYOTA's victory was built on a different kind of performance: a 4th-best median pace (1:05.389) combined with remarkable consistency across seven stints (σ = 1.22 s). After a first stint where they progressively gained 0.36 s/lap, stints 2 through 7 were all flagged as stable, with median lap times clustered between 1:04.960 and 1:05.727. That ability to maintain a steady, predictable rhythm across six pit stops — matching the majority of competitors on pit-stop count — proved more decisive than raw speed alone.

FORD (#24), runner-up with the 3rd best median pace (1:05.374), showed the most varied stint profile: their seven relays alternated between fast medians around 1:04.6–1:04.9 and slower ones above 1:06.0, suggesting driver changes with differing pace levels. LOTUS (#4) is the strategic highlight on the other side of the ledger: finishing fourth with only 5 pit stops (vs. 6 for most rivals) despite a 10th-best median pace (1:07.141), they clearly gained a lap through their stop strategy.

LAMBORGHINI (#18) suffered the steepest pace degradation of any single stint in the race: their 6th relay saw them lose 0.37 s per lap on a falling trend, and a similar drop of 0.20 s/lap appeared in their 7th. TESLA (#1), despite finishing last, recorded the best consistency figure of all 11 teams (σ = 0.80 s) — six perfectly controlled stints, but at a pace level (1:08.118 median) that could not compete for position.

Key takeaways for teams: At Circuit Beausoleil, race pace regularity over long stints outweighed peak speed. The TOYOTA example demonstrates that a top-4 median pace sustained without variation across seven stints wins finals. ALPINE's 8th-place finish with the best race pace in the field is a reminder that time lost in the pit lane is as decisive as time gained on track. For LOTUS, the one-stop undercut proved that a well-timed reduced pit-stop strategy can gain a full position against faster competitors.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the endurance final at Circuit Beausoleil in Laval on 9 July 2026?
TOYOTA (kart #3) won the 106-minute endurance final at Circuit Beausoleil in Laval on 9 July 2026, completing 77 laps — one more than the chasing group.
What was the fastest lap of the race, and which team set it?
The fastest lap of the endurance final at Circuit Beausoleil on 9 July 2026 was a 1:03.531, set by RENAULT (kart #2).
How many teams took part in the Circuit Beausoleil endurance final on 9 July 2026?
11 teams entered the endurance final at Circuit Beausoleil in Laval on 9 July 2026, racing over 106 minutes on the 1,220-metre circuit.
Which team had the best race pace but did not win at Circuit Beausoleil on 9 July 2026?
ALPINE (kart #13) recorded the best median race pace of all 11 teams (1:04.957) at Circuit Beausoleil on 9 July 2026, yet finished only eighth, 3 laps behind the winner.
What made the difference for TOYOTA's victory at Circuit Beausoleil on 9 July 2026?
TOYOTA combined a 4th-best median race pace (1:05.389) with exceptional consistency across seven stints (standard deviation of 1.22 s), maintaining stable lap times throughout the 106 minutes at Circuit Beausoleil on 9 July 2026.
How did LOTUS finish fourth at Circuit Beausoleil on 9 July 2026 despite a slower pace?
LOTUS (kart #4) made only 5 pit stops compared to 6 for most rivals during the 9 July 2026 final at Circuit Beausoleil, gaining a position through their reduced-stop strategy despite having the 10th-best median race pace.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
13TOYOTA761:04.7121:05.442 +0.3±20.1s#3
R1 11L · 1:06.388 · ±3.0 · 0.13R2 12L · 1:05.262 · ±20.5 · 2.88R3 11L · 1:05.365 · ±22.7 · 2.90R4 13L · 1:05.424 · ±19.3 · 1.89R5 12L · 1:05.906 · ±21.5 · 2.98R6 11L · 1:05.073 · ±21.0 · 2.60R7 6L · 1:04.964 · ±27.1 · 10.34
224FORD751:04.2801:05.709 +0.5±22.2s#4
R1 12L · 1:05.017 · ±1.4 · 0.23R2 12L · 1:06.805 · ±24.3 · 3.38R3 14L · 1:04.683 · ±21.6 · 2.38R4 12L · 1:06.681 · ±22.8 · 3.45R5 10L · 1:04.876 · ±23.0 · 4.15R6 8L · 1:06.124 · ±26.8 · 6.81R7 7L · 1:04.923 · ±26.6 · 5.62
317PORSCHE751:04.8171:06.464 +1.3±19.6s#7
R1 13L · 1:06.174 · ±1.3 · 0.13R2 15L · 1:07.922 · ±17.8 · 1.79R3 10L · 1:05.655 · ±22.1 · 3.97R4 9L · 1:07.135 · ±22.3 · 3.44R5 13L · 1:05.464 · ±19.3 · 2.02R6 7L · 1:06.952 · ±25.9 · 7.96R7 8L · 1:05.487 · ±23.7 · 5.94
44LOTUS751:05.7241:07.255 +2.1±19.7s#9
R1 10L · 1:07.791 · ±1.4 · 0.26R2 14L · 1:06.246 · ±20.5 · 1.98R3 13L · 1:07.255 · ±21.1 · 2.59R4 13L · 1:07.096 · ±21.6 · 2.67R5 17L · 1:07.695 · ±17.9 · 1.46R6 8L · 1:06.161 · ±26.3 · 6.62
520PEUGEOT751:04.7521:06.042 +0.9±21.8s#6
R1 12L · 1:05.963 · ±1.6 · 0.23R2 13L · 1:06.859 · ±27.4 · 3.33R3 11L · 1:05.488 · ±21.5 · 3.36R4 14L · 1:06.799 · ±19.8 · 2.24R5 9L · 1:04.990 · ±23.2 · 4.91R6 7L · 1:06.329 · ±26.4 · 8.08R7 9L · 1:05.188 · ±22.9 · 4.84
62RENAULT751:03.5311:05.236 +0.1±23.0s#24
R1 12L · 1:04.545 · ±1.9 · 0.21R2 11L · 1:07.620 · ±25.7 · 4.01R3 13L · 1:05.059 · ±23.4 · 2.57R4 10L · 1:08.043 · ±24.1 · 4.22R5 13L · 1:04.508 · ±23.1 · 2.52R6 5L · 1:06.873 · ±32.3 · 15.83R7 11L · 1:04.178 · ±22.6 · 3.59
718LAMBORGHINI751:05.6991:06.865 +1.7±20.6s#8
R1 11L · 1:06.455 · ±1.4 · 0.25R2 11L · 1:07.701 · ±22.2 · 3.57R3 11L · 1:06.829 · ±21.8 · 3.43R4 12L · 1:08.127 · ±20.6 · 2.17R5 13L · 1:06.362 · ±20.2 · 2.46R6 8L · 1:06.579 · ±24.9 · 6.01R7 9L · 1:06.271 · ±23.7 · 4.90
813ALIPNE761:03.6891:05.174±20.4s#17
R1 13L · 1:04.294 · ±1.4 · 0.17R2 12L · 1:06.223 · ±20.7 · 2.33R3 16L · 1:04.526 · ±17.8 · 1.45R4 13L · 1:06.158 · ±19.8 · 2.80R5 9L · 1:04.616 · ±23.4 · 3.74R6 5L · 1:06.091 · ±30.5 · 15.32R7 8L · 1:04.018 · ±25.7 · 6.50
926ALPHA ROMEO751:04.5041:05.874 +0.7±20.6s#54
R1 12L · 1:05.377 · ±1.7 · 0.33R2 13L · 1:06.834 · ±21.3 · 2.74R3 12L · 1:05.145 · ±20.9 · 3.01R4 14L · 1:06.141 · ±19.7 · 2.30R5 11L · 1:05.150 · ±21.2 · 2.69R6 5L · 1:05.923 · ±31.1 · 15.59R7 8L · 1:05.334 · ±23.8 · 4.39
107FERRARI721:05.6421:07.568 +2.4±24.8s#10
R1 11L · 1:07.075 · ±1.7 · 0.23R2 11L · 1:10.179 · ±27.7 · 4.29R3 13L · 1:06.172 · ±30.9 · 3.75R4 11L · 1:11.060 · ±23.8 · 3.70R5 13L · 1:06.426 · ±21.1 · 2.60R6 6L · 1:10.068 · ±29.4 · 11.20R7 7L · 1:06.020 · ±26.5 · 7.97
111TESLA721:06.8831:08.189 +3.0±26.9s#11
R1 11L · 1:07.665 · ±1.4 · 0.20R2 13L · 1:08.357 · ±21.4 · 2.54R3 11L · 1:07.430 · ±23.4 · 3.67R4 12L · 1:08.541 · ±46.8 · 4.62R5 15L · 1:08.118 · ±19.2 · 1.89R6 10L · 1:08.529 · ±23.7 · 4.34

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 0/3

At 80% distance (~21 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1ALIPNE #13P8 (+7)
2TOYOTA #3+4.6sP1 (-1)
3LAMBORGHINI #18+17.2sP7 (+4)
4FORD #24+1:13P2 (-2)
5RENAULT #2+1:16P6 (+1)
6ALPHA ROMEO #26+1:17P9 (+3)
7PEUGEOT #20+1:22P5 (-2)
8PORSCHE #17+1:26P3 (-5)
9LOTUS #4+2:45P4 (-5)
10FERRARI #7+5:12P10

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • Per-driver analysis
  • Finish projection
  • Pit wall
  • Live strategy and alerts
  • Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1▲33TOYOTA1:05.3381:04.712Tour 7777
224FORD1:04.9231:04.2801 Tour1 Tour76
3▲417PORSCHE1:05.0511:04.8171 Tour2.05476
4▲54LOTUS1:06.5541:05.7241 Tour5.95976
5▲120PEUGEOT1:05.3851:04.7521 Tour1.40176
6▼32RENAULT1:05.0041:03.5311 Tour13.59076
7▲118LAMBORGHINI1:08.8861:05.6991 Tour31.72576
8▼713ALIPNE1:03.6891:03.6893 Tours2 Tours74
9▼426ALPHA ROMEO1:05.3361:04.5044 Tours1 Tour73
107FERRARI1:06.8941:05.6424 Tours27.46773
111TESLA1:08.6011:06.8834 Tours20.98773