KES - 3H DE BRIGNOLES by PACIFIC · COURSE 2 - 1H30 Race1 min

BRIGNOLES KARTING LOISIR

BRIGNOLES KARTING LOISIR (987m) — — 15 drivers

Winner
PRV (#6)
Gap P1-P2
5.669
Best lap
59.891 — GAM'IT RACING ASSOCIATION
Teams
15
Stops (winner)
3

Endurance Race Report – Brignoles Karting Loisir (1h30, 15 Teams)

The 1h30 endurance race at Brignoles Karting Loisir (987 m circuit, RN 7 Brignoles) on 23 August 2026 brought together 15 teams for a competitive and tightly contested event. At the end of the session, it was PRV (kart #6) that claimed victory, crossing the line a full lap ahead of the chasing pack.

PRV completed 82 laps and finished with a gap of one lap over the group of teams locked on 83 laps — a result that underlines how effectively the team managed the full 1h30. Their best lap of 1:00.066 placed them among the quickest on circuit. In terms of pure pace, PRV ranked 2nd overall with a median race rhythm of 1:00.542, and their consistency was strong across all three stints, with an overall standard deviation of just 0.69 s. Notably, their second stint — 30 laps at a median of 1:00.422 — was their sharpest segment of the race.

GAM'IT RACING SPORT (kart #5) crossed the line in 2nd place, 5.669 s off the podium group leader, with 83 laps completed. They were the fastest team on pure median pace across the entire race (1:00.507), and their 57-lap opening stint at 1:00.417 was the most sustained fast run of the day. Their best lap of 59.992 was among the standout individual laps of the race.

PACIFIC RACING (kart #1) and APEX VAROISE (kart #7) completed the podium in 3rd and 4th, separated by just 0.279 s after 83 laps. PACIFIC RACING were the most consistent team of the race, recording the lowest standard deviation of any analysed team at just 0.50 s, with all three stints highly controlled. APEX VAROISE ranked 5th on pure rhythm (1:00.797) and likewise showed solid consistency across their stints.

PACIFIC ASSOCIATION (kart #2) finished 5th, yet their result deserves a closer look: their pure rhythm ranked only 9th (1:01.008), making them the clearest example of a team that outperformed their raw pace through strategy, gaining multiple positions over faster rivals. Conversely, GAM'IT RACING (kart #4) presents the opposite picture: ranked 3rd on pure median pace (1:00.600) but finishing only 6th, with a notably long first stint of 61 laps before their pit stop — a strategic choice that ultimately left time on the table.

GAM'IT RACING ASSOCIATION (kart #10) set the fastest lap of the entire race, a 59.891 recorded during their opening stint, which also produced their best median pace (1:00.246 over 40 laps). Their overall race pace ranked 4th, but higher irregularity (standard deviation of 1.06 s — the highest among the top teams) pulled their final result back to 7th. PACIFIC E-RACING (kart #3) completed the top 8 in 57.541 s, showing strong mid-race consistency.

Further back, ALEXMOMO (kart #12) stood out for the opposite reason: an opening stint with significant variability (σ = 1.61 s) before regaining composure in the final segment. KPLN (kart #15) finished 14th on 80 laps, three laps down. YORDLESTICK KARTING TEAM (kart #11) was classified 12th but recorded no tour or timing data.

Key takeaways for teams: At Brignoles on 23 August 2026, pure pace alone was not enough — GAM'IT RACING SPORT had the fastest median rhythm but could not convert it into a victory. PRV's win rested on a combination of solid pace (2nd on rhythm), high consistency, and well-managed pit stop strategy (3 stops). PACIFIC ASSOCIATION's gain of four positions over their raw-pace ranking confirms that stint management and pit stop timing can offset a speed deficit of over 0.5 s per lap on this 987 m circuit. Teams aiming to improve should look first at reducing lap-time variability: the gap between the most (PACIFIC RACING, σ = 0.50 s) and least (ALEXMOMO, σ = 1.35 s) consistent teams among the top ten translated directly into final positions.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the 23 August 2026 endurance race at Brignoles Karting Loisir?
PRV (kart #6) won the 1h30 endurance race at Brignoles Karting Loisir on 23 August 2026, completing 82 laps and finishing a full lap ahead of the second-place group.
What was the fastest lap of the race at Brignoles Karting Loisir on 23 August 2026?
The fastest lap of the race was set by GAM'IT RACING ASSOCIATION (kart #10) in 59.891 s, making it the quickest single lap recorded during the event.
How many teams took part in the Brignoles Karting Loisir endurance race on 23 August 2026?
15 teams started the 1h30 endurance race (Course 2) at Brignoles Karting Loisir on 23 August 2026.
Which team had the best pure median pace at Brignoles on 23 August 2026?
GAM'IT RACING SPORT (kart #5) recorded the best median race rhythm at 1:00.507, making them the fastest team on pure pace despite finishing 2nd overall.
Which team was the most consistent at Brignoles Karting Loisir on 23 August 2026?
PACIFIC RACING (kart #1) was the most consistent team of the race, posting the lowest lap-time standard deviation of 0.50 s across all their stints, and finished 3rd.
What made the difference between the top finishers at Brignoles Karting Loisir on 23 August 2026?
Strategy and consistency proved decisive: PRV combined 2nd-best pure pace with strong regularity and three well-timed pit stops to take victory, while PACIFIC ASSOCIATION gained four positions over their raw-pace ranking through effective stint management.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
16PRV821:00.0661:00.552±22.8s#2
R1 41L · 1:00.572 · ±18.8 · 0.18R2 31L · 1:00.439 · ±21.5 · 0.73R3 10L · 1:00.938 · ±36.4 · 5.10
25GAM'IT RACING SPORT8359.9921:00.509±22.8s#11
R1 58L · 1:00.431 · ±15.9 · 0.09R2 16L · 1:01.312 · ±29.7 · 2.32R3 9L · 1:00.690 · ±38.3 · 8.14
31PACIFIC RACING831:00.1031:00.874 +0.4±22.9s#6
R1 42L · 1:00.545 · ±18.7 · 0.15R2 22L · 1:01.032 · ±25.3 · 1.30R3 19L · 1:00.994 · ±27.4 · 1.70
47APEX VAROISE831:00.1021:00.818 +0.3±22.9s#5
R1 58L · 1:00.603 · ±15.9 · 0.11R2 12L · 1:00.887 · ±34.3 · 4.79R3 13L · 1:01.056 · ±32.5 · 3.28
52PACIFIC ASSOCIATION831:00.0951:01.018 +0.5±23.1s#9
R1 52L · 1:00.593 · ±17.1 · 0.14R2 14L · 1:01.448 · ±31.6 · 3.50R3 17L · 1:01.267 · ±29.0 · 2.15
64GAM'IT RACING8359.9441:00.609 +0.1±24.7s#33
R1 62L · 1:00.428 · ±19.1 · 0.09R2 1L · 1:00.646 · ±0.0 · 0.00R3 20L · 1:01.477 · ±36.2 · 3.25
710GAM'IT RACING ASSOCIATION8359.8911:00.661 +0.2±23.4s#43
R1 40L · 1:00.246 · ±0.8 · 0.02R2 20L · 1:02.217 · ±27.3 · 1.58R3 10L · 1:00.913 · ±36.9 · 5.32R4 13L · 1:02.190 · ±33.4 · 3.36
83PACIFIC E-RACING831:00.2901:00.956 +0.4±24.9s#71
R1 37L · 1:00.871 · ±20.0 · 0.12R2 30L · 1:00.865 · ±27.4 · 0.91R3 16L · 1:01.150 · ±29.7 · 2.34
912ALEXMOMO821:00.3271:00.962 +0.5±23.4s#81
R1 35L · 1:00.781 · ±20.4 · 0.25R2 22L · 1:02.234 · ±25.7 · 1.30R3 25L · 1:00.887 · ±24.9 · 1.16
109PACIFIC AVD821:00.9281:01.588 +1.1±23.1s#10
R1 45L · 1:01.238 · ±18.0 · 0.07R2 19L · 1:01.932 · ±27.4 · 1.70R3 18L · 1:02.532 · ±28.3 · 1.90
1114TEAM MACADAM811:01.2701:02.311 +1.8±23.1s#13
R1 36L · 1:02.310 · ±20.2 · 0.14R2 23L · 1:01.782 · ±25.1 · 1.35R3 22L · 1:02.606 · ±25.3 · 1.45
128EGUILLES RACING TEAM811:00.7521:02.188 +1.7±23.3s#111
R1 39L · 1:02.707 · ±19.8 · 0.05R2 26L · 1:01.153 · ±23.8 · 1.06R3 16L · 1:02.602 · ±29.4 · 2.70
1313TY RACING811:00.6851:02.267 +1.8±23.4s#121
R1 39L · 1:01.480 · ±19.7 · 0.30R2 33L · 1:02.343 · ±21.2 · 0.60R3 9L · 1:02.822 · ±38.9 · 8.35
1415KPLN801:01.5271:02.616 +2.1±25.4s#14
R1 55L · 1:02.308 · ±16.2 · 0.02R2 15L · 1:03.538 · ±38.1 · 3.21R3 10L · 1:02.903 · ±37.4 · 5.36

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 0/3

At 80% distance (~22 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1GAM'IT RACING #4P6 (+5)
2GAM'IT RACING ASSOCIATION #10+7.7sP7 (+5)
3GAM'IT RACING SPORT #5+8.3sP2 (-1)
4APEX VAROISE #7+11.4sP4
5PACIFIC RACING #1+14.0sP3 (-2)
6PACIFIC ASSOCIATION #2+14.0sP5 (-1)
7PRV #6+1:10P1 (-6)
8PACIFIC E-RACING #3+1:15P8
9PACIFIC AVD #9+1:25P10 (+1)
10EGUILLES RACING TEAM #8+2:37P12 (+2)

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • Per-driver analysis
  • Finish projection
  • Pit wall
  • Live strategy and alerts
  • Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1▲16PRV1:01.7501:00.066Tour 8482
2▲35GAM'IT RACING SPORT1:00.69059.9925.6695.66983
3▲11PACIFIC RACING1:02.0201:00.10319.07413.40583
4▲57APEX VAROISE1:02.2381:00.10219.3530.27983
5▲52PACIFIC ASSOCIATION1:01.0351:00.09531.47112.11883
6▲14GAM'IT RACING1:01.95659.94435.4393.96883
7▲410GAM'IT RACING ASSOCIATION1:02.13659.89150.70515.26683
8▼23PACIFIC E-RACING1:01.1621:00.29057.5416.83683
9▼812ALEXMOMO1:01.5081:00.3271 Tour1 Tour82
10▼79PACIFIC AVD1:02.7521:00.92820.42520.42582
11▼414TEAM MACADAM1:02.3231:01.2702 Tours1 Tour81
12▼28EGUILLES RACING TEAM1:02.4521:00.75217.88817.88881
1211YORDLESTICK KARTING TEAM
13▼413TY RACING1:02.2671:00.68518.3700.48281
14▼615KPLN1:02.9491:01.5273 Tours1 Tour80