4 - 1200M GP EQUIPE RACING · COURSE 1 GRP 2 Race⏱ 1h02

RKC RACING KART DE CORMEILLES

Piste 1200m — — 20 drivers

Winner
AIRCLIMO 2 (#2)
Gap P1-P2
17.246
Best lap
1:06.800 — AGOCLIM
Teams
20
Duration
1h01
Stops (winner)
4

RKC Cormeilles Endurance – Course 1 Grp 2, 25 September 2026

Twenty teams took to the 1,200-metre circuit of RKC Racing Kart de Cormeilles in Boissy-l'Aillerie on 25 September 2026 for a 61-minute endurance race (Course 1, Group 2). At the end of a tight and tactically demanding contest, AIRCLIMO 2 (kart #2) claimed victory with 48 laps completed, ahead of AGOCLIM (+17.246 s) and MJB (+22.997 s), both also on 48 laps.

SOLUTIONS TECHNIQUES completed the top four, 1:08.982 behind the winner and also on 48 laps, while EPG (kart #8) finished fifth with 49 laps — the highest lap count of the race — but ended up a lap down on the leading group in classification terms. ALPINISTES ACCÈS 2 crossed the line sixth, one lap behind the leaders.

The fastest lap of the race was set by AGOCLIM with a time of 1:06.800, the sharpest single lap of the entire afternoon. Yet it is AIRCLIMO 2 that takes the win, and the data explains why.

AIRCLIMO 2 was the most consistent team of the race, posting the lowest standard deviation in lap times (0.79 s) across the field. Although ranked only 2nd in pure pace — with a median race rhythm of 1:08.755 — their four pit stops were matched with remarkably stable stints throughout. Three of their five stints were rated stable, and they showed a brief acceleration phase in the opening relay. That combination of regularity and clean execution proved decisive.

AGOCLIM, runner-up on the road, tell a different story on paper. Their median race rhythm of 1:09.630 ranks only 6th in pure pace, and their standard deviation of 1.71 s reflects a more erratic pace profile. However, their final two stints were genuinely quick — a median of 1:07.851 then 1:07.253 — suggesting a strong end-of-race push that produced the absolute fastest lap but could not overturn the gap to the leader.

MJB (3rd) delivered a solid and consistent performance (0.87 s standard deviation, 3rd best pace), including a strong opening 17-lap stint. EPG (5th) are a notable case: their median pace of 1:09.052 ranks 4th, and with only 3 pit stops against 4 for most rivals, they managed the highest lap total (49) yet finished 5th in classification — a reminder of how pit-stop strategy interacts with lap counting in endurance racing.

The most striking gap between performance and result belongs to ALPINISTES ACCÈS 2: the best median race rhythm of the entire field (1:08.674), yet only 6th at the flag. Their pace was real — four stable or accelerating stints — but it did not translate into a podium position. Conversely, DTP2I (8th) showed the widest spread of performance (standard deviation 2.41 s, 15th best pace) yet outperformed their raw pace ranking through a 5-stint strategy.

Key takeaways for teams: At Cormeilles, consistency pays more than peak speed. AIRCLIMO 2's victory was built on the lowest lap-time variability in the field, not the fastest single lap. Teams with strong median pace but erratic rhythms — like AGOCLIM — must tighten their consistency across stints to convert speed into positions. The ALPINISTES ACCÈS 2 case also shows that best pace alone is not enough: strategic execution around pit stops remains the decisive variable on this 1,200-metre circuit.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the RKC Cormeilles endurance race on 25 September 2026?
AIRCLIMO 2 (kart #2) won Course 1 Group 2 at RKC Racing Kart de Cormeilles on 25 September 2026, completing 48 laps in 61 minutes ahead of AGOCLIM (+17.246 s) and MJB (+22.997 s).
What was the fastest lap of the race and which team set it?
The fastest lap of the Course 1 Group 2 at RKC Cormeilles on 25 September 2026 was set by AGOCLIM (kart #1) with a time of 1:06.800.
How many teams competed in this endurance race at RKC Cormeilles?
Twenty teams entered the 61-minute endurance race (Course 1, Group 2) at RKC Racing Kart de Cormeilles in Boissy-l'Aillerie on 25 September 2026.
Which team had the best pure race pace at RKC Cormeilles on 25 September 2026?
ALPINISTES ACCÈS 2 posted the best median race rhythm of the field (1:08.674 s per lap) but finished only 6th, showing that raw pace alone did not determine the final result.
Which team was the most consistent at RKC Cormeilles on 25 September 2026?
AIRCLIMO 2, the race winner, was the most consistent team with the lowest lap-time standard deviation of the race (0.79 s), reflecting very stable stints throughout the 61 minutes.
How many pit stops did the leading teams make at RKC Cormeilles on 25 September 2026?
AIRCLIMO 2, AGOCLIM, and MJB — the top three finishers on 25 September 2026 at RKC Cormeilles — each made 4 pit stops during the 61-minute race.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
12AIRCLIMO 2481:07.8591:08.790±15.2s#2
R1 11L · 1:08.833 · ±0.9 · ↘0.16R2 12L · 1:08.542 · ±15.3 · ↘2.10R3 7L · 1:09.398 · ±19.1 · ↘5.81R4 8L · 1:08.819 · ±18.7 · ↘4.71R5 10L · 1:08.434 · ±16.4 · ↘3.08
21AGOCLIM481:06.8001:09.740 +1.0±15.2s#6
R1 9L · 1:11.043 · ±1.0 · ↘0.26R2 8L · 1:11.121 · ±18.9 · ↘4.86R3 9L · 1:10.071 · ±16.5 · ↘3.60R4 10L · 1:08.189 · ±16.7 · ↘2.97R5 12L · 1:07.281 · ±15.1 · ↘2.13
313MJB481:08.3391:09.025 +0.2±15.8s#3
R1 17L · 1:08.988 · ±1.0 · →0.08R2 7L · 1:10.523 · ±21.9 · ↘6.83R3 12L · 1:08.994 · ±14.9 · ↘2.11R4 1L · 2:03.200 · ±0.0 · →0.00R5 11L · 1:08.896 · ±16.5 · ↘2.67
417SOLUTIONS TECHNIQUES481:07.7461:09.647 +0.9±17.6s#5
R1 12L · 1:08.110 · ±1.2 · →0.03R2 13L · 1:10.016 · ±19.2 · ↘2.52R3 10L · 1:10.004 · ±19.0 · ↘3.41R4 3L · 1:18.903 · ±25.0 · ↘27.75R5 10L · 1:09.584 · ±17.2 · ↘3.25
58EPG491:07.6031:09.139 +0.4±13.0s#4 ▲1
R1 13L · 1:08.198 · ±1.6 · →0.04R2 12L · 1:09.190 · ±14.6 · ↘2.05R3 13L · 1:09.139 · ±14.2 · ↘1.80R4 11L · 1:09.358 · ±16.0 · ↘2.52
64ALPINISTES ACCES 2481:07.9501:08.779±16.0s#1 ▲5
R1 11L · 1:09.434 · ±1.1 · ↘0.26R2 12L · 1:08.522 · ±17.1 · ↘2.51R3 12L · 1:08.955 · ±16.0 · ↘2.26R4 2L · 1:39.460 · ±30.3 · →0.00R5 11L · 1:08.551 · ±14.6 · ↘2.38
715SADEQ ELECTRICITE 1471:08.4741:10.574 +1.8±17.0s#7
R1 11L · 1:11.783 · ±15.5 · ↘2.62R2 10L · 1:11.303 · ±20.3 · ↘3.75R3 12L · 1:10.216 · ±17.7 · ↘2.47R4 14L · 1:09.336 · ±14.4 · ↘1.67
87DTP2I461:08.1961:11.892 +3.1±16.7s#14
R1 8L · 1:09.431 · ±1.5 · ↘0.35R2 9L · 1:12.859 · ±17.3 · ↘3.75R3 8L · 1:11.971 · ±18.9 · ↘5.14R4 9L · 1:15.726 · ±18.8 · ↘3.99R5 12L · 1:09.592 · ±16.7 · ↘2.41
916SALV'BATI461:09.6021:10.772 +2.0±21.5s#9
R1 10L · 1:11.511 · ±28.6 · ↘5.74R2 10L · 1:10.354 · ±21.7 · ↘4.14R3 12L · 1:11.067 · ±20.2 · ↘2.78R4 14L · 1:10.258 · ±15.0 · ↘1.61
109FFB 95 2471:09.4401:10.876 +2.1±16.5s#10
R1 1L · 1:11.263 · ±0.0 · →0.00R2 14L · 1:10.852 · ±13.0 · ↘1.50R3 4L · 1:11.606 · ±28.0 · ↘19.73R4 16L · 1:11.709 · ±15.8 · ↘1.56R5 12L · 1:10.347 · ±15.2 · ↘2.13
1118TEMPERE CONSTRUCTION 2451:07.7901:11.678 +2.9±23.4s#13
R1 10L · 1:13.323 · ±2.1 · ↘0.33R2 7L · 1:12.983 · ±28.7 · ↘8.83R3 11L · 1:11.088 · ±22.9 · ↘3.88R4 7L · 1:08.759 · ±35.0 · ↘10.97R5 10L · 1:09.283 · ±19.5 · ↘3.57
1219TERRALIS 2471:07.5541:10.678 +1.9±16.5s#8 ▲4
R1 11L · 1:08.494 · ±1.2 · ↘0.16R2 7L · 1:10.070 · ±21.6 · ↘6.59R3 10L · 1:13.272 · ±19.7 · ↘4.28R4 19L · 1:10.793 · ±15.9 · ↘1.06
1312LOXAM461:08.5751:11.184 +2.4±18.3s#11 ▲2
R1 10L · 1:13.082 · ±2.6 · ↘0.48R2 13L · 1:09.662 · ±17.9 · ↘2.24R3 4L · 1:21.809 · ±25.6 · ↘17.60R4 19L · 1:10.917 · ±19.2 · ↘1.41
1410GOGY 2461:09.6751:11.958 +3.2±20.0s#15
R1 11L · 1:10.565 · ±0.7 · →0.04R2 12L · 1:15.516 · ±25.4 · ↘3.81R3 11L · 1:10.209 · ±21.9 · ↘3.28R4 12L · 1:12.648 · ±19.1 · ↘2.84
1511GREEN WAY DEMOLITION431:10.6181:14.726 +5.9±23.0s#18
R1 10L · 1:18.642 · ±4.3 · ↘0.94R2 8L · 1:15.423 · ±27.3 · ↘6.51R3 8L · 1:11.628 · ±31.7 · ↘8.07R4 4L · 1:14.257 · ±30.3 · ↘21.06R5 13L · 1:14.016 · ±17.9 · ↘2.02
166CHILO431:10.3771:11.433 +2.7±29.4s#12 ▲4
R1 7L · 1:12.668 · ±3.0 · ↘0.63R2 10L · 1:11.315 · ±18.5 · ↘3.45R3 3L · 1:36.291 · ±35.0 · ↘35.54R4 3L · 1:28.176 · ±60.0 · ↘62.57R5 6L · 1:14.267 · ±26.2 · ↘9.94R6 14L · 1:10.809 · ±15.6 · ↘1.70
175BTP BANQUE421:09.6561:12.672 +3.9±31.9s#17
R1 10L · 1:11.135 · ±0.9 · →0.01R2 11L · 1:15.653 · ±24.6 · ↘4.62R3 7L · 1:11.069 · ±26.2 · ↘8.07R4 3L · 1:30.318 · ±26.9 · ↘28.51R5 1L · 3:38.926 · ±0.0 · →0.00R6 10L · 1:12.645 · ±27.1 · ↘5.06
1814PUM421:10.2061:12.352 +3.6±27.4s#16 ▲2
R1 2L · 1:13.399 · ±2.5 · →0.00R2 5L · 1:13.376 · ±27.3 · ↘14.08R3 5L · 1:10.874 · ±27.1 · ↘13.41R4 6L · 1:26.638 · ±26.8 · ↘11.29R5 12L · 1:11.996 · ±23.0 · ↘3.32R6 7L · 1:12.432 · ±27.0 · ↘8.41R7 5L · 1:11.897 · ±35.9 · ↘17.87
193ALHYSEES 2421:12.2511:17.905 +9.1±16.6s#20
R1 6L · 1:25.377 · ±3.9 · ↘2.00R2 9L · 1:13.316 · ±21.2 · ↘4.27R3 5L · 1:22.750 · ±17.1 · ↘8.82R4 4L · 1:22.204 · ±23.4 · ↘16.99R5 7L · 1:18.213 · ±2.6 · ↘0.81R6 11L · 1:15.958 · ±15.9 · ↘2.53
2020VANOIA RÉNOVATION 1401:11.8041:14.852 +6.1±33.6s#19 ▲1
R1 2L · 2:21.005 · ±56.2 · →0.00R2 15L · 1:13.125 · ±23.2 · ↘2.35R3 7L · 1:14.384 · ±24.9 · ↘7.88R4 8L · 1:15.299 · ±22.9 · ↘5.41R5 8L · 1:21.230 · ±42.9 · ↘11.31

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 1/3

At 80% distance (~12 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1EPG #8—P5 (+4)
2AIRCLIMO 2 #2+3.8sP1 (-1)
3MJB #13+7.4sP3 ✓
4AGOCLIM #1+22.3sP2 (-2)
5ALPINISTES ACCES 2 #4+1:16P6 (+1)
6SOLUTIONS TECHNIQUES #17+1:17P4 (-2)
7SADEQ ELECTRICITE 1 #15+1:43P7 ✓
8TERRALIS 2 #19+2:35P12 (+4)
9SALV'BATI #16+2:49P9 ✓
10FFB 95 2 #9+2:53P10 ✓

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • ✓ Per-driver analysis
  • ✓ Finish projection
  • ✓ Pit wall
  • ✓ Live strategy and alerts
  • ✓ Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro →

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1▲32AIRCLIMO 247.811:08.1411:07.859Tour 4948
2▼11AGOCLIM41.481:07.3081:06.80017.24617.24648
3▲413MJB41.171:08.4131:08.33922.9975.75148
4▼217SOLUTIONS TECHNIQUES23.4721.0624.881:09.4241:07.7461:08.98245.98548
5▼28EPG42.131:09.6421:07.6031 Tour15.06249
6–4ALPINISTES ACCES 242.491:08.5511:07.9501 Tour0.42848
7▲515SADEQ ELECTRICITE 129.921:08.7561:08.4741 Tour20.08747
8▼37DTP2I45.181:10.8081:08.1962 Tours40.33846
9▲216SALV'BATI30.921:10.1991:09.6022 Tours35.18346
10▼29FFB 95 225.411:09.7511:09.4402 Tours11.14547
11▲918TEMPERE CONSTRUCTION 241.971:08.8301:07.7903 Tours29.41345
12▼319TERRALIS 242.081:10.3991:07.5543 Tours1.08947
13▼312LOXAM42.211:12.7181:08.5754 Tours1:02.95946
14▼110GOGY 234.141:11.4731:09.6754 Tours40.74446
15▲311GREEN WAY DEMOLITION32.861:14.2781:10.6185 Tours58.69843
16–6CHILO24.7022.5125.671:12.8881:10.3775 Tours37.23443
17▼35BTP BANQUE33.191:11.1921:09.6566 Tours40.16842
18▼314PUM34.571:12.3571:10.2066 Tours7.05542
19▼23ALHYSEES 243.601:15.9431:12.2517 Tours33.01942
20▼120VANOIA RÉNOVATION 142.391:19.5251:11.8048 Tours1 Tour40