- Kart-Center
- France
- RKC RACING KART DE CORMEILLES
- Results & archive
- 4 - 1200M GP EQUIPE RACING · COURSE 1 GRP 2
4 - 1200M GP EQUIPE RACING · COURSE 1 GRP 2 Race⏱ 1h02
RKC RACING KART DE CORMEILLES
Piste 1200m — — 20 drivers
- Winner
AIRCLIMO 2 (#2)- Gap P1-P2
- 17.246
- Best lap
- 1:06.800 — AGOCLIM
- Teams
- 20
- Duration
- 1h01
- Stops (winner)
- 4
RKC Cormeilles Endurance – Course 1 Grp 2, 25 September 2026
Twenty teams took to the 1,200-metre circuit of RKC Racing Kart de Cormeilles in Boissy-l'Aillerie on 25 September 2026 for a 61-minute endurance race (Course 1, Group 2). At the end of a tight and tactically demanding contest, AIRCLIMO 2 (kart #2) claimed victory with 48 laps completed, ahead of AGOCLIM (+17.246 s) and MJB (+22.997 s), both also on 48 laps.
SOLUTIONS TECHNIQUES completed the top four, 1:08.982 behind the winner and also on 48 laps, while EPG (kart #8) finished fifth with 49 laps — the highest lap count of the race — but ended up a lap down on the leading group in classification terms. ALPINISTES ACCÈS 2 crossed the line sixth, one lap behind the leaders.
The fastest lap of the race was set by AGOCLIM with a time of 1:06.800, the sharpest single lap of the entire afternoon. Yet it is AIRCLIMO 2 that takes the win, and the data explains why.
AIRCLIMO 2 was the most consistent team of the race, posting the lowest standard deviation in lap times (0.79 s) across the field. Although ranked only 2nd in pure pace — with a median race rhythm of 1:08.755 — their four pit stops were matched with remarkably stable stints throughout. Three of their five stints were rated stable, and they showed a brief acceleration phase in the opening relay. That combination of regularity and clean execution proved decisive.
AGOCLIM, runner-up on the road, tell a different story on paper. Their median race rhythm of 1:09.630 ranks only 6th in pure pace, and their standard deviation of 1.71 s reflects a more erratic pace profile. However, their final two stints were genuinely quick — a median of 1:07.851 then 1:07.253 — suggesting a strong end-of-race push that produced the absolute fastest lap but could not overturn the gap to the leader.
MJB (3rd) delivered a solid and consistent performance (0.87 s standard deviation, 3rd best pace), including a strong opening 17-lap stint. EPG (5th) are a notable case: their median pace of 1:09.052 ranks 4th, and with only 3 pit stops against 4 for most rivals, they managed the highest lap total (49) yet finished 5th in classification — a reminder of how pit-stop strategy interacts with lap counting in endurance racing.
The most striking gap between performance and result belongs to ALPINISTES ACCÈS 2: the best median race rhythm of the entire field (1:08.674), yet only 6th at the flag. Their pace was real — four stable or accelerating stints — but it did not translate into a podium position. Conversely, DTP2I (8th) showed the widest spread of performance (standard deviation 2.41 s, 15th best pace) yet outperformed their raw pace ranking through a 5-stint strategy.
Key takeaways for teams: At Cormeilles, consistency pays more than peak speed. AIRCLIMO 2's victory was built on the lowest lap-time variability in the field, not the fastest single lap. Teams with strong median pace but erratic rhythms — like AGOCLIM — must tighten their consistency across stints to convert speed into positions. The ALPINISTES ACCÈS 2 case also shows that best pace alone is not enough: strategic execution around pit stops remains the decisive variable on this 1,200-metre circuit.
Frequently asked questions
- Who won the RKC Cormeilles endurance race on 25 September 2026?
- AIRCLIMO 2 (kart #2) won Course 1 Group 2 at RKC Racing Kart de Cormeilles on 25 September 2026, completing 48 laps in 61 minutes ahead of AGOCLIM (+17.246 s) and MJB (+22.997 s).
- What was the fastest lap of the race and which team set it?
- The fastest lap of the Course 1 Group 2 at RKC Cormeilles on 25 September 2026 was set by AGOCLIM (kart #1) with a time of 1:06.800.
- How many teams competed in this endurance race at RKC Cormeilles?
- Twenty teams entered the 61-minute endurance race (Course 1, Group 2) at RKC Racing Kart de Cormeilles in Boissy-l'Aillerie on 25 September 2026.
- Which team had the best pure race pace at RKC Cormeilles on 25 September 2026?
- ALPINISTES ACCÈS 2 posted the best median race rhythm of the field (1:08.674 s per lap) but finished only 6th, showing that raw pace alone did not determine the final result.
- Which team was the most consistent at RKC Cormeilles on 25 September 2026?
- AIRCLIMO 2, the race winner, was the most consistent team with the lowest lap-time standard deviation of the race (0.79 s), reflecting very stable stints throughout the 61 minutes.
- How many pit stops did the leading teams make at RKC Cormeilles on 25 September 2026?
- AIRCLIMO 2, AGOCLIM, and MJB — the top three finishers on 25 September 2026 at RKC Cormeilles — each made 4 pit stops during the 61-minute race.
Race replay
Loading replay…
Loading chart…
Race analysis
Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show
| Pos | # | Team | Laps | Best | Median pace | Consistency | True pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | AIRCLIMO 2 | 48 | 1:07.859 | 1:08.790 | ±15.2s | #2 |
R1 11L · 1:08.833 · ±0.9 · ↘0.16R2 12L · 1:08.542 · ±15.3 · ↘2.10R3 7L · 1:09.398 · ±19.1 · ↘5.81R4 8L · 1:08.819 · ±18.7 · ↘4.71R5 10L · 1:08.434 · ±16.4 · ↘3.08 | |||||||
| 2 | 1 | AGOCLIM | 48 | 1:06.800 | 1:09.740 +1.0 | ±15.2s | #6 |
R1 9L · 1:11.043 · ±1.0 · ↘0.26R2 8L · 1:11.121 · ±18.9 · ↘4.86R3 9L · 1:10.071 · ±16.5 · ↘3.60R4 10L · 1:08.189 · ±16.7 · ↘2.97R5 12L · 1:07.281 · ±15.1 · ↘2.13 | |||||||
| 3 | 13 | MJB | 48 | 1:08.339 | 1:09.025 +0.2 | ±15.8s | #3 |
R1 17L · 1:08.988 · ±1.0 · →0.08R2 7L · 1:10.523 · ±21.9 · ↘6.83R3 12L · 1:08.994 · ±14.9 · ↘2.11R4 1L · 2:03.200 · ±0.0 · →0.00R5 11L · 1:08.896 · ±16.5 · ↘2.67 | |||||||
| 4 | 17 | SOLUTIONS TECHNIQUES | 48 | 1:07.746 | 1:09.647 +0.9 | ±17.6s | #5 |
R1 12L · 1:08.110 · ±1.2 · →0.03R2 13L · 1:10.016 · ±19.2 · ↘2.52R3 10L · 1:10.004 · ±19.0 · ↘3.41R4 3L · 1:18.903 · ±25.0 · ↘27.75R5 10L · 1:09.584 · ±17.2 · ↘3.25 | |||||||
| 5 | 8 | EPG | 49 | 1:07.603 | 1:09.139 +0.4 | ±13.0s | #4 ▲1 |
R1 13L · 1:08.198 · ±1.6 · →0.04R2 12L · 1:09.190 · ±14.6 · ↘2.05R3 13L · 1:09.139 · ±14.2 · ↘1.80R4 11L · 1:09.358 · ±16.0 · ↘2.52 | |||||||
| 6 | 4 | ALPINISTES ACCES 2 | 48 | 1:07.950 | 1:08.779 | ±16.0s | #1 ▲5 |
R1 11L · 1:09.434 · ±1.1 · ↘0.26R2 12L · 1:08.522 · ±17.1 · ↘2.51R3 12L · 1:08.955 · ±16.0 · ↘2.26R4 2L · 1:39.460 · ±30.3 · →0.00R5 11L · 1:08.551 · ±14.6 · ↘2.38 | |||||||
| 7 | 15 | SADEQ ELECTRICITE 1 | 47 | 1:08.474 | 1:10.574 +1.8 | ±17.0s | #7 |
R1 11L · 1:11.783 · ±15.5 · ↘2.62R2 10L · 1:11.303 · ±20.3 · ↘3.75R3 12L · 1:10.216 · ±17.7 · ↘2.47R4 14L · 1:09.336 · ±14.4 · ↘1.67 | |||||||
| 8 | 7 | DTP2I | 46 | 1:08.196 | 1:11.892 +3.1 | ±16.7s | #14 |
R1 8L · 1:09.431 · ±1.5 · ↘0.35R2 9L · 1:12.859 · ±17.3 · ↘3.75R3 8L · 1:11.971 · ±18.9 · ↘5.14R4 9L · 1:15.726 · ±18.8 · ↘3.99R5 12L · 1:09.592 · ±16.7 · ↘2.41 | |||||||
| 9 | 16 | SALV'BATI | 46 | 1:09.602 | 1:10.772 +2.0 | ±21.5s | #9 |
R1 10L · 1:11.511 · ±28.6 · ↘5.74R2 10L · 1:10.354 · ±21.7 · ↘4.14R3 12L · 1:11.067 · ±20.2 · ↘2.78R4 14L · 1:10.258 · ±15.0 · ↘1.61 | |||||||
| 10 | 9 | FFB 95 2 | 47 | 1:09.440 | 1:10.876 +2.1 | ±16.5s | #10 |
R1 1L · 1:11.263 · ±0.0 · →0.00R2 14L · 1:10.852 · ±13.0 · ↘1.50R3 4L · 1:11.606 · ±28.0 · ↘19.73R4 16L · 1:11.709 · ±15.8 · ↘1.56R5 12L · 1:10.347 · ±15.2 · ↘2.13 | |||||||
| 11 | 18 | TEMPERE CONSTRUCTION 2 | 45 | 1:07.790 | 1:11.678 +2.9 | ±23.4s | #13 |
R1 10L · 1:13.323 · ±2.1 · ↘0.33R2 7L · 1:12.983 · ±28.7 · ↘8.83R3 11L · 1:11.088 · ±22.9 · ↘3.88R4 7L · 1:08.759 · ±35.0 · ↘10.97R5 10L · 1:09.283 · ±19.5 · ↘3.57 | |||||||
| 12 | 19 | TERRALIS 2 | 47 | 1:07.554 | 1:10.678 +1.9 | ±16.5s | #8 ▲4 |
R1 11L · 1:08.494 · ±1.2 · ↘0.16R2 7L · 1:10.070 · ±21.6 · ↘6.59R3 10L · 1:13.272 · ±19.7 · ↘4.28R4 19L · 1:10.793 · ±15.9 · ↘1.06 | |||||||
| 13 | 12 | LOXAM | 46 | 1:08.575 | 1:11.184 +2.4 | ±18.3s | #11 ▲2 |
R1 10L · 1:13.082 · ±2.6 · ↘0.48R2 13L · 1:09.662 · ±17.9 · ↘2.24R3 4L · 1:21.809 · ±25.6 · ↘17.60R4 19L · 1:10.917 · ±19.2 · ↘1.41 | |||||||
| 14 | 10 | GOGY 2 | 46 | 1:09.675 | 1:11.958 +3.2 | ±20.0s | #15 |
R1 11L · 1:10.565 · ±0.7 · →0.04R2 12L · 1:15.516 · ±25.4 · ↘3.81R3 11L · 1:10.209 · ±21.9 · ↘3.28R4 12L · 1:12.648 · ±19.1 · ↘2.84 | |||||||
| 15 | 11 | GREEN WAY DEMOLITION | 43 | 1:10.618 | 1:14.726 +5.9 | ±23.0s | #18 |
R1 10L · 1:18.642 · ±4.3 · ↘0.94R2 8L · 1:15.423 · ±27.3 · ↘6.51R3 8L · 1:11.628 · ±31.7 · ↘8.07R4 4L · 1:14.257 · ±30.3 · ↘21.06R5 13L · 1:14.016 · ±17.9 · ↘2.02 | |||||||
| 16 | 6 | CHILO | 43 | 1:10.377 | 1:11.433 +2.7 | ±29.4s | #12 ▲4 |
R1 7L · 1:12.668 · ±3.0 · ↘0.63R2 10L · 1:11.315 · ±18.5 · ↘3.45R3 3L · 1:36.291 · ±35.0 · ↘35.54R4 3L · 1:28.176 · ±60.0 · ↘62.57R5 6L · 1:14.267 · ±26.2 · ↘9.94R6 14L · 1:10.809 · ±15.6 · ↘1.70 | |||||||
| 17 | 5 | BTP BANQUE | 42 | 1:09.656 | 1:12.672 +3.9 | ±31.9s | #17 |
R1 10L · 1:11.135 · ±0.9 · →0.01R2 11L · 1:15.653 · ±24.6 · ↘4.62R3 7L · 1:11.069 · ±26.2 · ↘8.07R4 3L · 1:30.318 · ±26.9 · ↘28.51R5 1L · 3:38.926 · ±0.0 · →0.00R6 10L · 1:12.645 · ±27.1 · ↘5.06 | |||||||
| 18 | 14 | PUM | 42 | 1:10.206 | 1:12.352 +3.6 | ±27.4s | #16 ▲2 |
R1 2L · 1:13.399 · ±2.5 · →0.00R2 5L · 1:13.376 · ±27.3 · ↘14.08R3 5L · 1:10.874 · ±27.1 · ↘13.41R4 6L · 1:26.638 · ±26.8 · ↘11.29R5 12L · 1:11.996 · ±23.0 · ↘3.32R6 7L · 1:12.432 · ±27.0 · ↘8.41R7 5L · 1:11.897 · ±35.9 · ↘17.87 | |||||||
| 19 | 3 | ALHYSEES 2 | 42 | 1:12.251 | 1:17.905 +9.1 | ±16.6s | #20 |
R1 6L · 1:25.377 · ±3.9 · ↘2.00R2 9L · 1:13.316 · ±21.2 · ↘4.27R3 5L · 1:22.750 · ±17.1 · ↘8.82R4 4L · 1:22.204 · ±23.4 · ↘16.99R5 7L · 1:18.213 · ±2.6 · ↘0.81R6 11L · 1:15.958 · ±15.9 · ↘2.53 | |||||||
| 20 | 20 | VANOIA RÉNOVATION 1 | 40 | 1:11.804 | 1:14.852 +6.1 | ±33.6s | #19 ▲1 |
R1 2L · 2:21.005 · ±56.2 · →0.00R2 15L · 1:13.125 · ±23.2 · ↘2.35R3 7L · 1:14.384 · ±24.9 · ↘7.88R4 8L · 1:15.299 · ±22.9 · ↘5.41R5 8L · 1:21.230 · ±42.9 · ↘11.31 | |||||||
True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).
Finish projectionPodium predicted : 1/3
At 80% distance (~12 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:
| Projected | Team | Projected gap | Actual finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EPG #8 | — | P5 (+4) |
| 2 | AIRCLIMO 2 #2 | +3.8s | P1 (-1) |
| 3 | MJB #13 | +7.4s | P3 ✓ |
| 4 | AGOCLIM #1 | +22.3s | P2 (-2) |
| 5 | ALPINISTES ACCES 2 #4 | +1:16 | P6 (+1) |
| 6 | SOLUTIONS TECHNIQUES #17 | +1:17 | P4 (-2) |
| 7 | SADEQ ELECTRICITE 1 #15 | +1:43 | P7 ✓ |
| 8 | TERRALIS 2 #19 | +2:35 | P12 (+4) |
| 9 | SALV'BATI #16 | +2:49 | P9 ✓ |
| 10 | FFB 95 2 #9 | +2:53 | P10 ✓ |
Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).
Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you
- ✓ Per-driver analysis
- ✓ Finish projection
- ✓ Pit wall
- ✓ Live strategy and alerts
- ✓ Post-race debrief
€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.
Go Pro →Final classification
| Pos. | Δ | Kart | Driver | Nat. | S1 | S2 | S3 | Last lap | Best lap | Gap | Interval | Laps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▲3 | 2 | AIRCLIMO 2 | 47.81 | 1:08.141 | 1:07.859 | Tour 49 | 48 | ||||
| 2 | ▼1 | 1 | AGOCLIM | 41.48 | 1:07.308 | 1:06.800 | 17.246 | 17.246 | 48 | |||
| 3 | ▲4 | 13 | MJB | 41.17 | 1:08.413 | 1:08.339 | 22.997 | 5.751 | 48 | |||
| 4 | ▼2 | 17 | SOLUTIONS TECHNIQUES | 23.47 | 21.06 | 24.88 | 1:09.424 | 1:07.746 | 1:08.982 | 45.985 | 48 | |
| 5 | ▼2 | 8 | EPG | 42.13 | 1:09.642 | 1:07.603 | 1 Tour | 15.062 | 49 | |||
| 6 | – | 4 | ALPINISTES ACCES 2 | 42.49 | 1:08.551 | 1:07.950 | 1 Tour | 0.428 | 48 | |||
| 7 | ▲5 | 15 | SADEQ ELECTRICITE 1 | 29.92 | 1:08.756 | 1:08.474 | 1 Tour | 20.087 | 47 | |||
| 8 | ▼3 | 7 | DTP2I | 45.18 | 1:10.808 | 1:08.196 | 2 Tours | 40.338 | 46 | |||
| 9 | ▲2 | 16 | SALV'BATI | 30.92 | 1:10.199 | 1:09.602 | 2 Tours | 35.183 | 46 | |||
| 10 | ▼2 | 9 | FFB 95 2 | 25.41 | 1:09.751 | 1:09.440 | 2 Tours | 11.145 | 47 | |||
| 11 | ▲9 | 18 | TEMPERE CONSTRUCTION 2 | 41.97 | 1:08.830 | 1:07.790 | 3 Tours | 29.413 | 45 | |||
| 12 | ▼3 | 19 | TERRALIS 2 | 42.08 | 1:10.399 | 1:07.554 | 3 Tours | 1.089 | 47 | |||
| 13 | ▼3 | 12 | LOXAM | 42.21 | 1:12.718 | 1:08.575 | 4 Tours | 1:02.959 | 46 | |||
| 14 | ▼1 | 10 | GOGY 2 | 34.14 | 1:11.473 | 1:09.675 | 4 Tours | 40.744 | 46 | |||
| 15 | ▲3 | 11 | GREEN WAY DEMOLITION | 32.86 | 1:14.278 | 1:10.618 | 5 Tours | 58.698 | 43 | |||
| 16 | – | 6 | CHILO | 24.70 | 22.51 | 25.67 | 1:12.888 | 1:10.377 | 5 Tours | 37.234 | 43 | |
| 17 | ▼3 | 5 | BTP BANQUE | 33.19 | 1:11.192 | 1:09.656 | 6 Tours | 40.168 | 42 | |||
| 18 | ▼3 | 14 | PUM | 34.57 | 1:12.357 | 1:10.206 | 6 Tours | 7.055 | 42 | |||
| 19 | ▼2 | 3 | ALHYSEES 2 | 43.60 | 1:15.943 | 1:12.251 | 7 Tours | 33.019 | 42 | |||
| 20 | ▼1 | 20 | VANOIA RÉNOVATION 1 | 42.39 | 1:19.525 | 1:11.804 | 8 Tours | 1 Tour | 40 |
🏎️ 3D tracks