150 MIN ART OF CART · Finale Race⏱ 1h37

Eighteen teams lined up on 24 September 2026 for the 97-minute endurance final at Lignano Circuit FPV (1,187 m) in Precenicco. At the chequered flag, Wings for Life Raceinas (kart #5) claimed victory with 79 laps completed, one full lap ahead of Consecura X Aqendo (kart #13, 77 laps). Art of Car Burgenland 2027 (kart #10) completed the podium, also on 77 laps but 26.990 seconds adrift of second place.

Drivers Lounge (kart #17, 76 laps) and Solodue Scuderia Classica (kart #8, 76 laps) rounded out the top five, followed by Mairzedt Betonboden (kart #16), Veritas Haus Racing 1 (kart #18), and Digicom)) Racing Team 1 (kart #1), all on 76 laps. The best lap of the entire race was set by Solodue Scuderia Classica in a remarkable 1:01.650.

The pace analysis confirms Wings for Life Raceinas as the deserving winner: their median pace of 1:03.995 was the best in the field across their four pit stops and five stints. Their consistency was equally impressive, with an overall standard deviation of just 1.21 seconds. All five stints showed a stable trend, with only the final stint showing a gentle drift of 0.19 s/lap — a very controlled degradation over 97 minutes.

Consecura X Aqendo, second in pace as well as on the road (median 1:04.495), demonstrated excellent management across their five stints. Their fifth and final stint was their most consistent (σ = 0.45 s) and their fastest of the race at a median of 1:03.572 — a strong finish to the event.

The standout consistency award belongs to Drivers Lounge, the most regular team of the day with an overall standard deviation of just 0.9 seconds, the lowest in the field. Their third-best pure pace (median 1:04.711) translated into fourth place on the road — a coherent result built on metronomic lap times across all five stints.

One of the most interesting cases is Digicom)) Racing Team 1, who posted the 4th-best median pace (1:05.023) yet finished only 8th. With five pit stops and a pace that rivalled the podium finishers, their result suggests that on-track time management played a key role in their final position.

In contrast, Veritas Haus Racing 1 finished 7th despite ranking only 13th in pure pace (median 1:06.454). With only four pit stops — one fewer than most rivals — they gained track position through strategy. However, their overall consistency was the weakest in the analysed group (σ = 1.96 s), and their final stint showed a progressive slowdown of 0.21 s/lap.

Digicom)) Racing Team 2 present the most striking gap between pace and result: 7th-best median pace (1:05.435) but only 12th at the finish. Their first stint showed a promising improvement of 0.21 s/lap, yet the pace advantage could not be converted into positions on the day.

Key takeaways for teams: On a 1,187-metre circuit over 97 minutes, raw pace alone does not decide the outcome. Wings for Life Raceinas combined the best median pace with solid consistency and four well-timed pit stops. Drivers Lounge prove that extreme regularity (σ = 0.9 s) is a genuine weapon even without the outright fastest laps. Teams such as Digicom)) Racing Team 1 and Digicom)) Racing Team 2 show that pace superiority must be paired with effective pit stop management to be converted into positions.