Endurance Festival - 1h Juniors · Wedstrijd 4 Race⏱ 1h10

Worldkarts Kortrijk

Worldkarts Kortrijk (850m) — — 11 drivers

Winner
H: TWIN TURBO (#67)
Gap P1-P2
6.020
Best lap
1:17.426 — J: AF RACING TEAM
Teams
11
Duration
1h10
Stops (winner)
4

Endurance Report – Wedstrijd 4 at Worldkarts Kortrijk (70 min)

Worldkarts Kortrijk hosted the Wedstrijd 4, a 70-minute endurance race on the 850-metre circuit in Kortrijk, on 6 September 2026. Eleven teams took the start, and the event delivered a rich mix of pace, strategy and consistency battles across the field.

H: TWIN TURBO (kart #67) took the overall victory with 43 laps completed, finishing 6.020 seconds ahead of J: AF RACING TEAM (kart #61, 41 laps). Third place went to F: DOUBLE TROUBLE RACING (kart #69, 37 laps), 31.179 seconds off second. I: MDBAG-RACING (kart #62, 41 laps) came home fourth at 42.894 seconds, while G: TEAM RS ENDURANCE (kart #68, 42 laps) rounded out the top five, 59.927 seconds from the runner-up.

The fastest lap of the race was set by J: AF RACING TEAM in 1:17.426. TWIN TURBO's best lap was 1:17.454, with MDBAG-RACING posting 1:17.631 to complete the three quickest individual laps of the afternoon.

Strategy was the decisive factor for the winner. TWIN TURBO made four pit stops — one more than most of their rivals — and ranked only fifth in pure pace with a median race lap of 1:19.449. Yet their final stint (16 laps, median 1:17.767) proved decisive: switching to a much sharper pace in the closing phase of the race allowed them to overhaul competitors who had been quicker on raw speed throughout. All three stints were stable, with very controlled standard deviation figures (0.26, 0.95 and 0.63 s respectively).

The most striking pace–result mismatch of the race belonged to K: FRT JUNIORS (kart #60). Their median race lap of 1:18.317 was the best of the entire field — 0.06 s quicker than AF RACING TEAM — yet they crossed the line in eighth place. Their first two stints were outstanding (medians of 1:18.073 and 1:17.822, both stable), but their third and final stint saw the median drop to 1:22.546, which, combined with the time lost in pit stops, cost them dearly in the final classification.

J: AF RACING TEAM were the most consistent team on track, posting a standard deviation of just 0.53 s across their 41 laps and three stints — the lowest regularity figure in the field. Their pace (2nd in pure speed) and consistency were fully aligned with their second-place finish, making them one of the most complete performances of the day.

I: MDBAG-RACING (3rd in pure pace, 4th on the road) showed strong pace in their first two stints (medians of 1:18.120 and 1:17.969) but their third stint slipped to 1:20.131, which may explain the gap to the podium positions. G: TEAM RS ENDURANCE (4th in pace) were solid and regular throughout (σ 0.71 s), though their last stint showed a slight rise of 0.30 s/lap in lap times, settling them into fifth.

Further down the order, D: RT RACING and B: MATTHEO & HELENE ranked 9th and 10th in pure pace respectively, reflecting their sixth and seventh-place finishes. F: DOUBLE TROUBLE RACING (3rd at the flag) benefited from a strong final stint (15 laps, median 1:18.851), recovering from two opening stints that were significantly slower, though their overall regularity (σ 4.54 s) was the second weakest in the field. A: PROJECT APEX completed only 22 laps, the fewest among finishers.

Key takeaways for teams: At Worldkarts Kortrijk, raw pace alone does not win races — as FRT JUNIORS demonstrated. Managing pit-stop timing and maintaining pace in the final stint proved more decisive. TWIN TURBO's four-stop strategy, combined with an aggressive closing phase, outweighed a mid-table pace profile. Meanwhile, AF RACING TEAM's exceptional regularity (0.53 s σ) underlines how lap-time consistency reduces time losses and keeps a car in contention throughout a 70-minute event.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the Wedstrijd 4 endurance race at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 6 September 2026?
H: TWIN TURBO (kart #67) won the 70-minute Wedstrijd 4 at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 6 September 2026, completing 43 laps and finishing 6.020 seconds ahead of J: AF RACING TEAM.
What was the fastest lap of the race and which team set it?
The fastest lap of the Wedstrijd 4 at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 6 September 2026 was a 1:17.426, set by J: AF RACING TEAM (kart #61).
How many teams took part in the Wedstrijd 4 at Worldkarts Kortrijk?
Eleven teams started the Wedstrijd 4 endurance race at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 6 September 2026.
Which team had the best pure race pace at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 6 September 2026?
K: FRT JUNIORS (kart #60) posted the best median race lap of the event (1:18.317) at Worldkarts Kortrijk on 6 September 2026, though they ultimately finished eighth due to a slower final stint.
What made the difference for TWIN TURBO's victory at the Wedstrijd 4?
At Worldkarts Kortrijk on 6 September 2026, TWIN TURBO won through strategy: four pit stops and a sharply quicker closing stint (median 1:17.767 over 16 laps) allowed them to outpace rivals who held a higher pure-speed ranking throughout the race.
Which team was the most consistent at Worldkarts Kortrijk during the Wedstrijd 4?
J: AF RACING TEAM was the most consistent team at the Wedstrijd 4 on 6 September 2026, recording the lowest lap-time standard deviation of the race at just 0.53 seconds across 41 laps.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
167H: TWIN TURBO431:17.4541:19.495 +1.1±4.6s#5
R1 8L · 1:19.729 · ±7.8 · ↘2.04R2 18L · 1:19.656 · ±3.1 · ↘0.20R3 17L · 1:17.781 · ±3.3 · ↘0.27
261J: AF RACING TEAM411:17.4261:18.422±5.8s#2
R1 11L · 1:18.422 · ±7.1 · ↘1.16R2 17L · 1:18.410 · ±5.7 · ↘0.45R3 4L · 1:18.797 · ±5.6 · ↘1.46R4 9L · 1:18.697 · ±4.1 · ↘0.96
369F: DOUBLE TROUBLE RACING371:18.2801:26.975 +8.6±8.8s#11
R1 7L · 1:26.975 · ±5.3 · ↘1.75R2 10L · 1:29.419 · ±10.5 · ↗1.27R3 3L · 1:34.717 · ±1.0 · ↗1.19R4 17L · 1:19.030 · ±3.9 · →0.03
462I: MDBAG-RACING411:17.6311:19.309 +0.9±6.0s#4
R1 6L · 1:18.203 · ±9.9 · ↘3.80R2 5L · 1:18.048 · ±4.8 · ↘2.58R3 15L · 1:18.246 · ±5.8 · ↘0.52R4 15L · 1:20.293 · ±4.1 · ↘0.18
568G: TEAM RS ENDURANCE421:18.3011:19.138 +0.7±5.7s#3 ▲2
R1 16L · 1:18.629 · ±6.1 · ↘0.55R2 9L · 1:18.851 · ±7.0 · ↘1.84R3 11L · 1:19.678 · ±4.0 · ↘0.54R4 6L · 1:20.174 · ±4.9 · ↘2.04
652D: RT RACING391:19.8351:23.388 +5.0±6.2s#8
R1 11L · 1:23.885 · ±5.3 · ↘0.92R2 8L · 1:35.233 · ±1.8 · →0.07R3 11L · 1:21.853 · ±2.9 · ↘0.46R4 9L · 1:21.060 · ±3.6 · ↘0.86
756B: MATTHEO & HELENE401:19.7661:23.309 +4.9±5.6s#7
R1 9L · 1:23.623 · ±5.9 · ↘1.19R2 8L · 1:34.246 · ±1.4 · ↗0.17R3 23L · 1:22.150 · ±3.3 · →0.15
859K: FRT JUNIORS271:21.9901:23.679 +5.3±6.3s#9
R1 6L · 1:23.130 · ±7.0 · ↘3.09R2 9L · 1:28.964 · ±7.4 · ↗1.26R3 12L · 1:23.060 · ±2.6 · ↘0.38
860K: FRT JUNIORS431:17.5091:18.395±5.8s#1 ▲7
R1 10L · 1:18.183 · ±7.9 · ↘1.41R2 20L · 1:17.849 · ±5.6 · ↘0.28R3 13L · 1:22.691 · ±2.7 · ↘0.31
958A: PROJECT APEX221:19.7661:28.781 +10.4±4.0s#12
R1 12L · 1:29.627 · ±1.5 · ↘0.21R2 10L · 1:22.598 · ±3.2 · ↘0.62
1070E: SALLY & MCQUEEN391:19.9561:24.919 +6.5±6.1s#10
R1 10L · 1:21.894 · ±6.1 · ↘1.26R2 12L · 1:20.565 · ±3.3 · ↘0.45R3 17L · 1:32.509 · ±1.6 · ↘0.18
1155C: A-FORCE381:20.5741:22.478 +4.1±6.6s#6 ▲5
R1 11L · 1:21.550 · ±6.1 · ↘0.80R2 8L · 1:22.466 · ±4.2 · ↘0.58R3 10L · 1:22.072 · ±4.2 · ↘0.96R4 9L · 1:34.908 · ±1.4 · →0.09

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 0/3

At 80% distance (~14 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1G: TEAM RS ENDURANCE #68—P5 (+4)
2I: MDBAG-RACING #62+1:02P4 (+2)
3J: AF RACING TEAM #61+1:14P2 (-1)
4H: TWIN TURBO #67+1:15P1 (-3)
5E: SALLY & MCQUEEN #70+4:19P10 (+5)
6B: MATTHEO & HELENE #56+4:38P7 (+1)
7D: RT RACING #52+4:49P6 (-1)
8K: FRT JUNIORS #60+4:54P8 ✓
9F: DOUBLE TROUBLE RACING #69+6:57P3 (-6)
10C: A-FORCE #55+7:04P11 (+1)

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • ✓ Per-driver analysis
  • ✓ Finish projection
  • ✓ Pit wall
  • ✓ Live strategy and alerts
  • ✓ Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro →

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
167H: TWIN TURBO1:17.6161:17.454Ronde 4243
261J: AF RACING TEAM1:17.9911:17.4266.02041
369F: DOUBLE TROUBLE RACING16.9451:18.6591:18.28031.17937
462I: MDBAG-RACING16.8121:19.4401:17.63142.89441
568G: TEAM RS ENDURANCE16.7421:19.8731:19.09259.92742
6▼552D: RT RACING17.1591:20.0491:19.8351 Ronde39
756B: MATTHEO & HELENE17.07951.79612.7741:21.6491:20.57434.19240
860K: FRT JUNIORS17.3741:22.0601:21.3403 Rondes43
958A: PROJECT APEX17.7641:22.2721:19.7664 Rondes22
1070E: SALLY & MCQUEEN19.19559.2761:31.5161:25.9836 Rondes39
1155C: A-FORCE20.2891:34.2321:20.9673.79439