GP YESSS 2026 30'+2h en 390cc · 2h d'endurance Race⏱ 1h52

CIRCUIT DE L'EUROPE

Piste Karting sens normal (1200m) — — 22 drivers

Winner
LISIEUX 2 (#7)
Gap P1-P2
34.247
Best lap
1:11.111 — ELBEUF 3
Teams
22
Duration
1h51
Stops (winner)
7

2h Endurance – Circuit de l'Europe, Sotteville-sous-le-Val (22 teams)

The Circuit de l'Europe in Sotteville-sous-le-Val hosted a highly competitive 2-hour endurance race on 1 October 2026, with 22 teams lining up on the 1,200-metre karting circuit (normal direction). After 111 minutes of racing, it was LISIEUX 2 (kart #7) who took the chequered flag in first position, completing 91 laps.

The battle at the front was intense. ELBEUF 2 (kart #10) crossed the line in second place, also on 91 laps but 34.247 seconds behind. Third went to ELBEUF 3 (kart #11), two laps down at the finish. LISIEUX 1 (kart #36) came home fourth, 48.422 seconds behind the third-place car on the same lap count (88 laps). Positions five through seven — CHARTRES 4, EVREUX 2 and EVREUX 1 — all completed 89 laps, separated by a total of just under 30 seconds. All seven pit stop counts in the top ten stood at 7 passages au stand.

The best lap of the race was set by ELBEUF 3 in a stunning 1:11.111, the quickest single lap of the afternoon. LISIEUX 2 responded with a best lap of 1:11.144, while ELBEUF 2 recorded 1:11.590.

The analysis reveals that LISIEUX 2 held the strongest pure pace of the entire field, with a median race rhythm of 1:11.763 — ranking first in pure speed. Their consistency was equally impressive (standard deviation of 1.27 s), and their six stints were predominantly stable, with only modest degradation of 0.17–0.19 s/lap in two of them. This combination of outright pace and management explains their victory.

ELBEUF 2 matched LISIEUX 2 on lap count with the 2nd-best pure rhythm (1:12.367). Their strategy of completing just four stints — including two very long ones of 30 and 27 laps — proved particularly efficient, keeping degradation under control. ELBEUF 3 (3rd in pure pace, 1:12.420) showed greater variability (σ = 1.81 s), with two stints where pace dropped noticeably, yet they recovered well to finish on the podium.

The standout strategic story comes from CHARTRES 3: finishing 9th overall despite ranking only 14th in pure rhythm, they extracted maximum value from their pit stop strategy. Conversely, DREUX 2 showed the 4th-best pure pace but could only manage 13th place, illustrating how raw speed alone does not determine the result in endurance racing.

CHARTRES 4 deserves credit as the most consistent team of the race, posting the lowest standard deviation of the field at 1.18 s, never deviating far from their median pace of 1:13.738 across seven stints — a model of regularity that helped them secure 5th place. At the other end of the spectrum, DIEPPE suffered the heaviest degradation of the race, losing 1.44 s/lap during their fourth stint.

Key takeaways for teams: At the Circuit de l'Europe, pure pace is necessary but not sufficient — LISIEUX 2's victory rested on combining the best median rhythm with controlled degradation across all stints. Long, stable stints (as demonstrated by ELBEUF 2's 30- and 27-lap runs) can reduce time lost in the pit lane. Regularity (low σ) consistently translates into better-than-expected finishing positions, while teams suffering recurring late-stint degradation need to review stint lengths and driver management.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the 2-hour endurance race at Circuit de l'Europe on 1 October 2026?
LISIEUX 2 (kart #7) won the 2-hour endurance race at Circuit de l'Europe in Sotteville-sous-le-Val on 1 October 2026, completing 91 laps to take victory over ELBEUF 2 by 34.247 seconds.
What was the fastest lap of the race at Circuit de l'Europe on 1 October 2026?
The best lap of the race was set by ELBEUF 3 (kart #11) in a time of 1:11.111, making it the quickest single lap recorded during the event on 1 October 2026.
How many teams competed in the endurance race at Circuit de l'Europe on 1 October 2026?
22 teams took the start of the 2-hour endurance race at Circuit de l'Europe in Sotteville-sous-le-Val on 1 October 2026.
Which team had the best pure race pace at Circuit de l'Europe on 1 October 2026?
LISIEUX 2 posted the best pure median race rhythm of the field at 1:11.763 per lap during the endurance race at Circuit de l'Europe on 1 October 2026, which also corresponded to their winning position.
Which team was the most consistent during the race at Circuit de l'Europe on 1 October 2026?
CHARTRES 4 was the most consistent team on 1 October 2026 at Circuit de l'Europe, recording the lowest lap-time standard deviation in the field (1.18 s) across their seven stints, finishing 5th overall.
Were there any notable strategic performances at Circuit de l'Europe on 1 October 2026?
Yes — CHARTRES 3 finished 9th overall despite ranking only 14th in pure pace, gaining several positions through strategy, while DREUX 2 had the 4th-best pure rhythm but finished 13th, highlighting the importance of strategy in the endurance race at Circuit de l'Europe on 1 October 2026.

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
17LISIEUX 2911:11.1441:11.862±6.8s#1
R1 8L · 1:11.657 · ±0.4 · →0.05R2 17L · 1:12.174 · ±6.6 · ↘0.40R3 13L · 1:11.531 · ±5.4 · ↘0.39R4 13L · 1:12.005 · ±7.8 · ↘0.62R5 2L · 1:20.480 · ±11.2 · →0.00R6 2L · 1:24.805 · ±17.7 · →0.00R7 19L · 1:11.520 · ±5.0 · ↘0.30R8 17L · 1:11.601 · ±5.7 · ↘0.31
210ELBEUF 2911:11.5901:12.415 +0.6±6.7s#2
R1 9L · 1:12.376 · ±0.4 · →0.00R2 10L · 1:12.710 · ±5.0 · ↘0.41R3 2L · 1:25.633 · ±18.1 · →0.00R4 5L · 1:12.829 · ±10.6 · ↘1.76R5 31L · 1:12.661 · ±4.0 · →0.06R6 2L · 1:26.697 · ±17.1 · →0.00R7 28L · 1:12.068 · ±4.1 · ↘0.15R8 4L · 1:12.514 · ±8.8 · ↘0.40
311ELBEUF 3891:11.1111:12.647 +0.8±9.0s#3
R1 5L · 1:11.768 · ±0.4 · →0.09R2 11L · 1:14.621 · ±8.7 · ↘0.71R3 13L · 1:12.827 · ±8.4 · ↘0.80R4 17L · 1:11.789 · ±7.1 · ↘0.46R5 14L · 1:15.233 · ±7.2 · ↘0.44R6 15L · 1:12.448 · ±9.2 · ↘0.77R7 2L · 1:31.906 · ±21.7 · →0.00R8 12L · 1:11.468 · ±8.4 · ↘0.82
436LISIEUX 1881:11.8191:13.230 +1.4±7.7s#4
R1 6L · 1:13.060 · ±0.3 · →0.07R2 17L · 1:13.921 · ±6.2 · ↘0.41R3 12L · 1:16.126 · ±9.0 · ↘0.79R4 7L · 1:12.937 · ±10.5 · ↘2.00R5 9L · 1:13.573 · ±6.5 · ↘0.72R6 7L · 1:13.492 · ±10.0 · ↘1.80R7 3L · 1:12.837 · ±12.6 · ↗1.96R8 27L · 1:12.620 · ±5.7 · ↘0.18
533CHARTRES 4891:12.1151:13.833 +2.0±7.3s#6
R1 1L · 1:14.272 · ±0.0 · →0.00R2 11L · 1:14.082 · ±8.6 · ↘1.08R3 13L · 1:13.671 · ±7.7 · ↘0.64R4 13L · 1:14.383 · ±6.7 · ↘0.53R5 11L · 1:13.581 · ±8.1 · ↘0.93R6 12L · 1:14.333 · ±6.6 · ↘0.75R7 13L · 1:13.716 · ±6.0 · ↘0.57R8 15L · 1:12.976 · ±7.4 · ↘0.56
635EVREUX 2891:11.8831:13.851 +2.0±8.0s#7
R1 3L · 1:14.327 · ±1.0 · ↘0.45R2 9L · 1:13.140 · ±6.7 · ↘0.69R3 14L · 1:14.572 · ±9.9 · ↘0.76R4 13L · 1:14.222 · ±7.1 · ↘0.64R5 15L · 1:13.691 · ±8.1 · ↘0.61R6 10L · 1:12.805 · ±9.1 · ↘1.27R7 10L · 1:13.402 · ±9.4 · ↘1.02R8 15L · 1:13.477 · ±6.3 · ↘0.46
729EVREUX 1891:12.7081:13.923 +2.1±7.8s#8
R1 5L · 1:14.547 · ±0.3 · →0.03R2 12L · 1:13.968 · ±7.7 · ↘0.71R3 12L · 1:15.330 · ±11.0 · ↘1.05R4 12L · 1:14.459 · ±7.0 · ↘0.80R5 12L · 1:13.578 · ±6.6 · ↘0.49R6 10L · 1:14.764 · ±8.4 · ↘0.97R7 13L · 1:13.461 · ±8.0 · ↘0.71R8 13L · 1:13.339 · ±6.3 · ↘0.51
86ELBEUF 1881:11.9781:14.040 +2.2±8.5s#9
R1 3L · 1:12.705 · ±0.1 · →0.07R2 11L · 1:13.781 · ±6.7 · ↘0.62R3 12L · 1:16.267 · ±9.0 · ↘0.70R4 11L · 1:15.504 · ±9.5 · ↘1.06R5 14L · 1:13.333 · ±12.4 · ↘1.12R6 12L · 1:13.587 · ±6.2 · ↘0.33R7 8L · 1:12.963 · ±6.0 · ↘0.67R8 17L · 1:14.632 · ±6.7 · ↘0.36
932CHARTRES 3871:13.2171:14.904 +3.0±7.9s#12
R1 1L · 1:14.109 · ±0.0 · →0.00R2 17L · 1:16.202 · ±7.1 · ↘0.35R3 14L · 1:15.061 · ±8.2 · ↘0.69R4 14L · 1:14.513 · ±8.7 · ↘0.72R5 16L · 1:16.159 · ±7.2 · ↘0.59R6 1L · 1:11.804 · ±0.0 · →0.00R7 11L · 1:14.161 · ±9.3 · ↘1.98R8 13L · 1:14.082 · ±7.0 · ↘0.62
1026CHARTRES 1751:11.6631:14.614 +2.8±10.0s#10
R1 2L · 1:40.160 · ±14.4 · →0.00R2 7L · 1:17.611 · ±11.3 · ↘2.49R3 14L · 1:12.692 · ±6.0 · ↘0.59R4 12L · 1:16.591 · ±9.6 · ↘0.70R5 10L · 1:16.184 · ±11.0 · ↘1.32R6 7L · 1:14.998 · ±11.3 · ↘2.01R7 23L · 1:12.314 · ±5.5 · ↘0.28
1137DREUX 1871:12.8881:14.710 +2.8±8.6s#11
R1 1L · 1:16.575 · ±0.0 · →0.00R2 11L · 1:14.844 · ±9.8 · ↘1.22R3 14L · 1:14.817 · ±10.0 · ↘0.94R4 11L · 1:17.897 · ±8.7 · ↘0.81R5 12L · 1:15.629 · ±9.8 · ↘0.87R6 15L · 1:14.592 · ±7.1 · ↘0.66R7 2L · 1:22.709 · ±12.7 · →0.00R8 21L · 1:13.517 · ±5.4 · ↘0.24
1248DEAUVILLE 2871:13.9661:15.013 +3.2±10.1s#13
R1 3L · 1:15.357 · ±0.4 · ↘0.30R2 14L · 1:14.292 · ±12.9 · ↘1.16R3 14L · 1:15.752 · ±10.7 · ↘0.83R4 10L · 1:15.048 · ±12.9 · ↘1.43R5 12L · 1:15.004 · ±8.5 · ↘0.41R6 12L · 1:16.751 · ±9.0 · ↘0.80R7 1L · 1:19.841 · ±0.0 · →0.00R8 21L · 1:14.742 · ±8.3 · ↘0.69
1343DREUX 2871:11.6991:13.374 +1.5±10.8s#5 ▲8
R1 3L · 1:20.791 · ±0.9 · ↘1.12R2 11L · 1:19.144 · ±15.9 · ↘1.90R3 12L · 1:12.722 · ±8.4 · ↘1.03R4 12L · 1:17.721 · ±10.0 · ↘0.78R5 11L · 1:17.920 · ±14.0 · ↘1.38R6 32L · 1:12.209 · ±6.3 · ↘0.24R7 3L · 1:11.943 · ±8.2 · ↗1.28R8 3L · 1:12.281 · ±8.3 · ↗2.16
1423CHARTRES 1121:12.5141:17.914 +6.1±10.4s#23
R1 2L · 1:12.628 · ±0.1 · →0.00R2 10L · 1:18.683 · ±10.7 · →0.10
149LISIEUX 3861:13.2701:15.249 +3.4±9.0s#14
R1 4L · 1:19.635 · ±1.0 · ↗0.38R2 12L · 1:15.637 · ±10.3 · ↘1.25R3 12L · 1:14.373 · ±9.0 · ↘0.75R4 14L · 1:15.409 · ±11.2 · ↘0.75R5 10L · 1:17.375 · ±9.6 · ↘0.98R6 6L · 1:16.588 · ±7.4 · ↘1.17R7 11L · 1:15.257 · ±8.6 · ↘1.40R8 17L · 1:14.372 · ±6.3 · ↘0.34
158CHARTRES 2861:13.6451:15.381 +3.5±9.7s#15
R1 4L · 1:15.092 · ±2.3 · ↗0.32R2 11L · 1:17.945 · ±9.6 · ↘0.89R3 12L · 1:15.442 · ±11.0 · ↘1.49R4 14L · 1:15.043 · ±7.8 · ↘0.76R5 11L · 1:17.134 · ±10.9 · ↘0.91R6 11L · 1:15.292 · ±9.4 · ↘1.27R7 7L · 1:13.881 · ±11.1 · ↘1.84R8 8L · 1:14.981 · ±9.8 · ↘1.26R9 8L · 1:14.002 · ±10.3 · ↘1.55
1625VERNON 2861:13.7681:16.382 +4.5±9.4s#17
R1 5L · 1:15.062 · ±0.4 · ↗0.16R2 13L · 1:17.843 · ±9.5 · ↘0.79R3 12L · 1:16.180 · ±8.8 · ↘0.84R4 10L · 1:16.650 · ±11.0 · ↘1.36R5 11L · 1:17.499 · ±10.6 · ↘1.10R6 10L · 1:15.869 · ±9.5 · ↘1.39R7 12L · 1:14.997 · ±9.9 · ↘1.12R8 13L · 1:16.772 · ±8.3 · ↘0.59
1738DREUX 3851:14.1691:16.496 +4.6±9.5s#18
R1 3L · 1:20.945 · ±0.8 · ↘0.56R2 12L · 1:17.383 · ±10.8 · ↘1.35R3 10L · 1:17.734 · ±12.2 · →0.11R4 10L · 1:19.554 · ±12.0 · ↘1.25R5 25L · 1:15.878 · ±7.6 · ↘0.40R6 6L · 1:15.950 · ±11.8 · ↘1.81R7 12L · 1:14.828 · ±5.2 · ↘0.55R8 7L · 1:14.418 · ±6.2 · ↘0.79
182DEAUVILLE 1851:15.1171:16.874 +5.0±9.2s#19
R1 2L · 1:19.527 · ±1.3 · →0.00R2 14L · 1:17.791 · ±11.1 · ↘0.85R3 14L · 1:17.802 · ±10.1 · ↘0.92R4 1L · 1:13.870 · ±0.0 · →0.00R5 14L · 1:17.397 · ±7.1 · ↘1.03R6 11L · 1:15.930 · ±11.3 · ↘1.31R7 18L · 1:16.399 · ±7.2 · ↘0.45R8 11L · 1:15.942 · ±8.6 · ↘0.73
1927HAVRE 1831:12.9131:15.869 +4.0±11.6s#16 ▲3
R1 4L · 1:13.875 · ±0.4 · →0.04R2 10L · 1:18.761 · ±11.0 · ↘1.12R3 11L · 1:29.167 · ±12.2 · ↘0.66R4 11L · 1:14.097 · ±10.3 · ↘1.88R5 12L · 1:16.102 · ±9.5 · ↘0.84R6 9L · 1:26.772 · ±13.0 · ↘1.30R7 12L · 1:13.436 · ±8.3 · ↘1.28R8 14L · 1:15.314 · ±7.1 · ↘0.32
2039HAVRE 2841:14.2451:17.286 +5.4±10.4s#20
R1 5L · 1:18.953 · ±0.2 · →0.01R2 10L · 1:18.972 · ±13.0 · ↘1.72R3 11L · 1:16.789 · ±11.1 · ↘1.40R4 11L · 1:17.264 · ±11.8 · ↘1.22R5 11L · 1:20.088 · ±9.8 · ↘0.78R6 10L · 1:16.494 · ±10.1 · ↘1.29R7 12L · 1:17.530 · ±10.9 · ↘0.99R8 14L · 1:14.851 · ±6.7 · ↘0.58
2141DIEPPE831:15.2731:17.405 +5.5±11.2s#21
R1 4L · 1:17.984 · ±0.5 · ↗0.16R2 14L · 1:17.505 · ±11.0 · ↘1.07R3 12L · 1:18.163 · ±12.0 · ↘1.29R4 14L · 1:17.050 · ±9.7 · ↘0.85R5 7L · 1:19.387 · ±14.1 · ↘1.71R6 8L · 1:16.615 · ±14.0 · ↘2.62R7 12L · 1:16.912 · ±10.0 · ↘0.85R8 12L · 1:16.136 · ±10.6 · ↘1.12
223VERNON 1841:14.1171:17.554 +5.7±9.3s#22
R1 4L · 1:26.961 · ±3.1 · →0.11R2 12L · 1:16.450 · ±7.7 · ↘1.08R3 12L · 1:18.534 · ±10.5 · ↘0.90R4 9L · 1:24.364 · ±10.6 · ↘0.86R5 12L · 1:16.546 · ±7.5 · ↘1.14R6 11L · 1:17.091 · ±9.7 · ↘0.96R7 11L · 1:21.331 · ±10.2 · ↘0.84R8 13L · 1:14.966 · ±6.4 · ↘0.73

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 3/3

At 80% distance (~22 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1LISIEUX 2 #7—P1 ✓
2ELBEUF 2 #10+1:23P2 ✓
3ELBEUF 3 #11+2:51P3 ✓
4CHARTRES 4 #33+3:06P5 (+1)
5EVREUX 2 #35+3:07P6 (+1)
6ELBEUF 1 #6+4:17P8 (+2)
7EVREUX 1 #29+4:27P7 ✓
8LISIEUX 1 #36+5:16P4 (-4)
9CHARTRES 3 #32+6:08P9 ✓
10DREUX 2 #43+6:53P13 (+3)

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • ✓ Per-driver analysis
  • ✓ Finish projection
  • ✓ Pit wall
  • ✓ Live strategy and alerts
  • ✓ Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro →

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1▲67LISIEUX 21:12.9041:11.144Tour 9991
2–10ELBEUF 21:13.0761:11.59034.24734.24791
3▼211ELBEUF 31:11.3581:11.1112 Tours2 Tours89
4▲236LISIEUX 11:14.6081:11.81948.42248.42288
5▲333CHARTRES 41:13.4871:12.1153 Tours1 Tour89
6▲435EVREUX 21:13.3921:11.8835.7095.70989
7▲229EVREUX 11:13.2741:12.70824.26518.55689
8▼46ELBEUF 11:15.3731:11.97825.0050.74088
9▲232CHARTRES 31:14.7861:13.2175 Tours2 Tours87
1026CHARTRES 11:12.4421:11.6638.0868.08675
11▲437DREUX 11:13.4981:12.88823.53715.45187
12–48DEAUVILLE 21:14.7421:13.9661:13.85050.31387
13▲843DREUX 21:12.2811:11.6996 Tours1 Tour87
14▲29LISIEUX 31:14.7941:13.27011.05511.05586
15▼18CHARTRES 21:13.6611:13.64523.04711.99286
16▼325VERNON 21:18.1931:13.7681:02.47539.42886
17▲338DREUX 31:15.7661:14.1697 Tours1 Tour85
18▼12DEAUVILLE 11:17.0531:15.1170.5360.53685
19▼1427HAVRE 11:15.2371:12.9138 Tours1 Tour83
20▼239HAVRE 21:16.4351:14.24510.19210.19284
21▼241DIEPPE1:15.7131:15.2739 Tours1 Tour83
22–3VERNON 11:15.3601:14.11745.99345.99384