CHALLENGE THALES GEMENOS · Course Race1h01

KARTING CIRCUIT PAUL RICARD

Karting Paul Ricard (964m) — — 13 drivers

Winner
BLACK ARROW (#8)
Gap P1-P2
2.975
Best lap
1:00.097 — FALCON
Teams
13
Duration
1h01
Stops (winner)
3

Endurance Race Report – Karting Circuit Paul Ricard, 11 September 2026

Thirteen teams took to the 964-metre Karting Paul Ricard circuit on 11 September 2026 for a 61-minute endurance race that delivered a gripping battle at the front and a wealth of technical lessons across the field.

BLACK ARROW (kart #8) claimed victory with 54 laps completed, finishing with a lead of a full lap over the chasing pack. The win was well deserved on every metric: BLACK ARROW recorded the best median pace of the race (1:01.654) and the lowest consistency deviation (±0.73 s), combining speed and regularity in a way no other team could match. All four stints were remarkably composed, the team producing stable lap times throughout and setting their personal best of 1:00.927 during stint 3.

FALCON (kart #7) finished second, also on 54 laps but 2.975 seconds adrift at the flag. FALCON's strength lay in their raw speed — they set the fastest lap of the entire race, a 1:00.097, and posted the second-best median pace (1:01.706). Their final stint was their quickest (median 1:00.691), suggesting a team that finished the race stronger than it started. A gap of less than 0.1 s per lap in median pace between first and second made the fight for victory extremely close.

LES JOE BARS (kart #19) secured the final podium position with 53 laps, one lap behind the leaders. Their performance was consistent across all four stints (overall ±0.82 s), and they held third place in pure pace as well as in the final standings — a clean and controlled race.

ALPINE (kart #3) finished fourth with 52 laps, showing notable variation between stints — a first and third stint around 1:02.6–1:02.9 contrasted with a second and fourth stint closer to 1:04.7 and 1:04.4 respectively, reflecting a significant pace swing across drivers or conditions. CHOUFFE (kart #25) came fifth, separated from ALPINE by just 7.526 seconds despite a slightly slower median pace, benefiting from solid consistency (±0.92 s).

LES MONTAGNARDS (kart #21) were the strategic highlight of the race: classified sixth overall, they ranked only eighth in pure median pace, yet gained two net positions through a remarkably even four-stint execution (overall ±0.76 s, one of the best in the field). LES MINOTS (kart #12) and SENNA (kart #6) rounded out the group on 52 laps in seventh and eighth, though both showed the highest consistency deviations in that group (±1.43 s and ±1.63 s respectively), with accelerating tendencies in their final stints pointing to irregular driving or changing conditions.

POLACOS (kart #22) finished ninth with 50 laps. Their data reveals a significant rhythm gap between their odd stints (medians around 1:03.4–1:03.9) and even stints (medians around 1:08.0–1:08.2), a contrast that explains their position drop relative to pace potential. RAS (kart #16) showed a similar pattern, finishing tenth with 49 laps and an overall deviation of ±2.48 s. LES TETES BRULEES (kart #17) and GRANCHIO (kart #10) shared 48 laps in eleventh and twelfth. LES TETES BRULEES recorded the highest overall median (1:09.129) and the only stint in the race with a confirmed pace loss — stint 2 slowing by 0.16 s per lap. GRANCHIO improved progressively across their four stints, their fourth being their fastest.

BANSHEE'S (kart #24) crossed the line thirteenth with 41 laps, 12 laps off the lead. However, their best lap time of 1:03.021 placed them ninth in pure pace across the field — a strong individual performance that was not reflected in the final classification.

Key takeaways for teams: BLACK ARROW demonstrated that combining the best median pace with the best consistency is the most effective recipe for victory in endurance racing — no single exceptional lap is worth as much as 54 laps close to maximum pace. FALCON's faster absolute speed was not enough to overcome BLACK ARROW's superior regularity over the full distance. LES MONTAGNARDS proved that stable pace management can outperform raw speed, gaining two positions over teams with better lap times. Teams such as POLACOS and RAS, whose pace varied drastically between stints, highlighted how driver-to-driver performance gaps directly translate into lost laps and positions over 61 minutes.

Frequently asked questions

Who won the endurance race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026?
BLACK ARROW (kart #8) won the 61-minute endurance race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026, completing 54 laps with the best median pace and the best consistency in the field.
What was the fastest lap of the race at Karting Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026, and which team set it?
The fastest lap of the race was a 1:00.097, set by FALCON (kart #7) at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026.
How many teams competed in the endurance race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026?
Thirteen teams started the 61-minute endurance race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026.
What was the margin of victory at the Karting Paul Ricard endurance race on 11 September 2026?
BLACK ARROW finished 2.975 seconds ahead of FALCON after 54 laps in the endurance race at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026.
Which team showed the best pace consistency at Karting Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026?
BLACK ARROW recorded the lowest consistency deviation of the race (±0.73 s per lap) at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026, making them the most regular team from start to finish.
Which team performed above their pace level thanks to strategy at Karting Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026?
LES MONTAGNARDS finished sixth overall despite ranking only eighth in pure median pace at Karting Circuit Paul Ricard on 11 September 2026, gaining two net positions through highly consistent stint management (±0.76 s).

Race replay

Loading replay…

Loading chart…

Race analysis

Stints, pace and consistency — the insight the timing screen doesn't show

Pos#TeamLapsBestMedian paceConsistencyTrue pace
18BLACK ARROW541:00.9271:01.654±0.7s#1
R1 12L · 1:01.644 · ±0.3 · 0.05R2 13L · 1:01.762 · ±1.2 · 0.16R3 14L · 1:01.473 · ±0.5 · 0.05R4 15L · 1:01.728 · ±0.6 · 0.05
27FALCON541:00.0971:01.706 +0.1±1.1s#2
R1 12L · 1:02.691 · ±0.7 · 0.08R2 14L · 1:01.016 · ±0.7 · 0.08R3 13L · 1:01.905 · ±0.8 · 0.01R4 15L · 1:00.691 · ±0.7 · 0.08
319LES JOE BARS531:01.7291:02.960 +1.3±1.6s#3
R1 12L · 1:02.397 · ±0.7 · 0.11R2 14L · 1:03.026 · ±0.9 · 0.01R3 13L · 1:02.946 · ±2.8 · 0.28R4 14L · 1:03.212 · ±0.6 · 0.01
43ALPINE521:02.0831:03.794 +2.1±3.6s#4
R1 12L · 1:02.650 · ±0.6 · 0.08R2 13L · 1:04.762 · ±5.5 · 0.64R3 13L · 1:02.949 · ±0.7 · 0.00R4 14L · 1:04.477 · ±3.2 · 0.02
525CHOUFFE521:03.0441:04.073 +2.4±0.9s#6
R1 12L · 1:03.955 · ±0.9 · 0.06R2 13L · 1:03.725 · ±0.8 · 0.14R3 13L · 1:03.611 · ±1.0 · 0.06R4 14L · 1:04.450 · ±0.7 · 0.13
621LES MONTAGNARDS521:03.4861:04.339 +2.7±0.8s#7
R1 12L · 1:04.386 · ±0.5 · 0.07R2 13L · 1:04.556 · ±0.8 · 0.04R3 13L · 1:04.211 · ±0.7 · 0.05R4 14L · 1:04.124 · ±0.9 · 0.06
712LES MINOTS521:02.5591:04.002 +2.3±2.7s#52
R1 11L · 1:04.269 · ±4.3 · 0.74R2 14L · 1:03.674 · ±0.8 · 0.15R3 12L · 1:04.446 · ±2.5 · 0.28R4 15L · 1:03.375 · ±2.2 · 0.20
86SENNA521:02.4661:04.375 +2.7±2.2s#8
R1 12L · 1:03.865 · ±0.9 · 0.08R2 13L · 1:04.965 · ±1.3 · 0.19R3 13L · 1:03.092 · ±3.2 · 0.15R4 14L · 1:04.659 · ±2.3 · 0.06
922POLACOS501:02.7311:06.004 +4.3±3.1s#10
R1 12L · 1:03.885 · ±0.7 · 0.10R2 12L · 1:08.250 · ±3.2 · 0.22R3 13L · 1:03.306 · ±0.7 · 0.06R4 13L · 1:07.962 · ±0.8 · 0.11
1016RAS491:03.8041:08.121 +6.5±3.0s#12
R1 11L · 1:05.625 · ±2.2 · 0.03R2 12L · 1:10.112 · ±2.7 · 0.14R3 12L · 1:04.607 · ±2.4 · 0.28R4 14L · 1:08.548 · ±1.1 · 0.07
1117LES TETES BRULEES481:04.3611:09.272 +7.6±2.7s#13
R1 11L · 1:09.405 · ±1.3 · 0.23R2 12L · 1:10.498 · ±2.5 · 0.32R3 12L · 1:05.669 · ±1.8 · 0.16R4 13L · 1:08.940 · ±2.1 · 0.01
1210GRANCHIO481:05.1861:07.381 +5.7±11.3s#111
R1 12L · 1:09.305 · ±21.3 · 2.78R2 10L · 1:07.549 · ±3.3 · 0.63R3 12L · 1:06.766 · ±1.1 · 0.14R4 14L · 1:06.493 · ±1.0 · 0.04
1324BANSHEE'S411:03.0211:05.850 +4.2±15.9s#94
R1 7L · 1:37.441 · ±7.5 · 3.70R2 12L · 1:05.464 · ±0.6 · 0.05R3 8L · 1:33.780 · ±3.2 · 0.66R4 14L · 1:04.523 · ±0.9 · 0.10

True pace = rank by median lap (ignoring track position). ▲ = faster than current place. Per stint: laps · median pace · ±consistency · ↗/↘ degradation (s/lap).

Finish projectionPodium predicted : 3/3

At 80% distance (~12 min to go), the engine projected this order from true pace and remaining stops:

ProjectedTeamProjected gapActual finish
1BLACK ARROW #8P1
2FALCON #7+2.7sP2
3LES JOE BARS #19+1:16P3
4ALPINE #3+2:27P4
5CHOUFFE #25+2:31P5
6SENNA #6+2:36P8 (+2)
7LES MONTAGNARDS #21+2:38P6 (-1)
8LES MINOTS #12+3:39P7 (-1)
9POLACOS #22+3:42P9
10RAS #16+6:34P10

Based on pure pace. Penalties and regulations (mandatory stops) explain the midfield noise — refined with team accounts (coming).

🏁 For endurance teams

Win races with the data the timing screen doesn't give you

  • Per-driver analysis
  • Finish projection
  • Pit wall
  • Live strategy and alerts
  • Post-race debrief

€39/ month · No commitment. Cancel anytime. All features included.

Go Pro

Final classification

Pos.ΔKartDriverNat.S1S2S3Last lapBest lapGapIntervalLaps
1▲18BLACK ARROW1:01.7281:00.927Tour 5857
2▼17FALCON1:00.8001:00.0972.97557
319LES JOE BARS1:02.7001:01.7291 Tour56
43ALPINE1:04.2721:02.0832 Tours55
525CHOUFFE1:04.1691:03.0447.52655
6▲221LES MONTAGNARDS1:05.1361:03.48616.48355
7▼112LES MINOTS1:03.1071:02.55920.31355
8▼16SENNA1:05.6621:02.46631.44555
922POLACOS1:07.6171:02.7314 Tours53
1016RAS1:07.9971:03.8045 Tours52
11▲217LES TETES BRULEES1:08.0101:04.3616 Tours51
12▼110GRANCHIO1:08.0311:05.18613.87351
13▼124BANSHEE'S1:04.0541:03.02112 Tours45